Lexical influence in phonetic decision making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 1363-1389

  McQueen, James M ^a   Norris, Dennis ^a   Cutler, Anne ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033471353     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.5.1363     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Burnage, G. (1990). CELEX: A guide for users. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: CELEX.
2. Burton, M. W., Baum, S. R., & Blumstein, S. E. (1989). Lexical effects on the phonetic categorization of speech: The role of acoustic structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 567-575.
3. Cairns, P., Shillcock, R., Chater, N., & Levy, J. (1995). Bottom-up connectionist modelling of speech. In J. P. Levy, D. Bairaktaris, J. A. Bullinaria, & P. Cairns (Eds.), Connectionist models of memory and language (pp. 289-310). London: UCL Press.
4. Connine, C. M., & Clifton, C. (1987). Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 291-299.
5. Connine, C. M., Titone, D., Deelman, T., & Blasko, D. (1997). Similarity mapping in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 463-480.
6. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Seguí, J. (1987). Phoneme identification and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 141-177.
7. Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1979). Monitoring sentence comprehension. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 113-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Eimas, P. D., Marcovitz Hornstein, S. B., & Payton, P. (1990). Attention and the role of dual codes in phoneme monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 160-180.
9. Eimas, P. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (1992). Contextual coherence and attention in phoneme monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 375-395.
10. Elman, J. L., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 143-165.
11. Foss, D. J., & Blank, M. A. (1980). Identifying the speech codes. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 1-31.
12. Foss, D. J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1983). Cracking the dual code: Toward a unitary model of phoneme identification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 609-632.
13. Fox, R. A. (1984). Effect of lexical status on phonetic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 526-540.
14. Frauenfelder, U. H., Baayen, R. H., Hellwig, F. M., & Schreuder, R. (1993). Neighborhood density and frequency across languages and modalities. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 781-804.
15. Frauenfelder, U. H., & Seguí, J. (1989). Phoneme monitoring and lexical processing: Evidence for associative context effects. Memory & Cognition, 17, 134-140.
16. Frauenfelder, U. H., Seguí, J., & Dijkstra, T. (1990). Lexical effects in phonemic processing: Facilitatory or inhibitory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 77-91.
17. Ganong, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 110-125.
18. Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, A. M., Fowler, C., & Fisher, F. W. (1977). Phonetic segmentation and recoding in the beginning reader. In A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (Eds.), Towards a psychology of reading (pp. 207-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Mann, V. A. (1986). Distinguishing universal and language-dependent levels of speech perception: Evidence from Japanese listeners' perception of English "1" and "r." Cognition, 24, 169-196.
20. Mann, V. A., & Repp, B. H. (1981). Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 548-558.
21. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1984). Function and process in spoken word recognition. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 125-149). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Warren, P. (1994). Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: Words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review, 101, 653-675.
23. Massaro, D. W. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological enquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Massaro, D. W. (1989). Testing between the TRACE model and the Fuzzy Logical Model of Speech Perception. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 398-421.
25. Massaro, D. W. (1997). Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1991). Integration versus interactive activation: The joint influence of stimulus and context in perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 558-614.
27. Massaro, D. W., & Oden, G. C. (1995). Independence of lexical context and phonological information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1053-1064.
28. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
29. McQueen, J. M. (1991). The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: Stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 433-443.
30. McQueen, J. M., & Pitt, M. A. (1996). Transitional probability and phoneme monitoring. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 4, 2502-2505.
31. Miller, J. L., & Dexter, E. R. (1988). Effects of speaking rate and lexical status on phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 369-378.
32. Morais, J., Bertelson, P., Cary, L., & Alegria, J. (1986). Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition, 24, 45-64.
33. Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7, 323-331.
34. Newman, R. S., Sawusch, J. R., & Luce, P. A. (1997). Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 873-889.
35. Norris, D. (1993). Bottom-up connectionist models of "interaction." In G. T. M. Altmann & R. Shillcock (Eds.), Cognitive models of speech processing: The second Sperlonga meeting (pp. 211-234). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Norris, D. G. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
37. Norris, D. G., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (in press). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
38. Oden, G. C., & Massaro, D. W. (1978). Integration of featural information in speech perception. Psychological Review, 85, 172-191.
39. Pitt, M. A. (1995). The locus of the lexical shift in phoneme identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1037-1052.
40. Pitt, M. A., & McQueen, J. M. (1998). Is compensation for coarticulation mediated by the lexicon? Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 347-370.
41. Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1990). Attentional allocation during speech perception: How fine is the focus? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 611-632.
42. Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1993). An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 699-725.
43. Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1995). Lexical and sublexical feedback in auditory word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 149-188.
44. Read, C. A., Zhang, Y., Nie, H., & Ding, B. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic reading. Cognition, 24, 31-44.
45. Rubin, P., Turvey, M. T., & van Gelder, P. (1976). Initial phonemes are detected faster in spoken words than in non-words. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 394-398.
46. Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606-621.
47. Samuel, A. G. (1981). Phonemic restoration: Insights from a new methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 474-494.
48. Samuel, A. G. (1987). Lexical uniqueness effects on phonemic restoration. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 36-56.
49. Samuel, A. G. (1996). Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 28-51.
50. Seguí, J., & Frauenfelder, U. (1986). The effect of lexical constraints upon speech perception. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performances (pp. 795-808). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
51. Streeter, L. A., & Nigro, G. N. (1979). The role of medial consonant transitions in word perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 65, 1533-1541.
52. Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science, 9, 325-329.
53. Whalen, D. H. (1984). Subcategorical phonetic mismatches slow phonetic judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 49-64.
54. Whalen, D. H. (1991). Subcategorical phonetic mismatches and lexical access. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 351-360.
55. Wurm, L. H., & Samuel, A. G. (1997). Lexical inhibition and attentional allocation during speech perception: Evidence from phoneme monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 165-187.