jTRACE: A reimplementation and extension of the TRACE model of speech perception and spoken word recognition

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 19-30

  Strauss, Ted J ^a   Harris, Harlan D ^b   Magnuson, James S ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Hastens Laboratories   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34347229058     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03192840     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ALLOPENNA, P. D., MAGNUSON, J. S., & TANENHAUS, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 419-439.
2. DAHAN, D., MAGNUSON, J. S., & TANENHAUS, M. K. (2001). Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 317-367.
3. DAHAN, D., MAGNUSON, J. S., TANENHAUS, M. K., & HOGAN, E. M. (2001). Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition. Language & Cognitive Processes, 16, 507-534.
4. ELMAN, J. L., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1988). Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 143-165.
5. FRAUENFELDER, U. H., & CONTENT, A. (2000). Activation flow in models of spoken word recognition. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Spoken Word Access Processes (pp. 79-82). Nijmegen.
6. FRAUENFELDER, U. H., & PEETERS, G. (1998). Simulating the time course of spoken word recognition: An analysis of lexical competition in TRACE. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 101-146). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. FRAUENFELDER, U. H., SEGUI, J., & DUKSTRA, T. (1990). Lexical effects in phonemic processing: Facilitatory or inhibitory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 77-91.
8. LUCE, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley.
9. MAGNUSON, J. S., DAHAN, D., & TANENHAUS, M. K. (2001). On the interpretation of computational models: The case of TRACE. In J. S. Magnuson & K. M. Crosswhite (Eds.), University of Rochester Working Papers in the Language Sciences, 2, 71-91. Available at www.bcs .rochester.edu/cls/s2001v2n1/magnuson_urwpls_v2n1.pdf.
10. MAGNUSON, J. S., MCMURRAY, B., TANENHAUS, M. K., & ASLIN, R. N. (2003). Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: The ghost of Christmash past. Cognitive Science, 27, 285-298.
11. MAGNUSON, J. S., STRAUSS, T. J., & HARRIS, H. D. (2005). Interaction in spoken word recognition models: Feedback helps. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1379-1384). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. MARSLEN-WILSON, W., & TYLER, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1-71.
13. MARSLEN-WILSON, W., & WARREN, P. (1994). Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: Words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review, 101, 653-675.
14. MASSARO, D. W. (1989). Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 398-421.
15. MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1991). Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1-44.
16. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & ELMAN, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
17. MCCLELLAND, J. L., MIRMAN, D., & HOLT, L. L. (2006). Are there interactive processes in speech perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 363-369.
18. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
19. MILLER, J. L., & EIMAS, P. D. (1995). Speech perception: From signal to word. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 467-492.
20. MIRMAN, D., MCCLELLAND, J. L., & HOLT, L. L. (2005). Computational and behavioral investigations of lexically induced delays in phoneme recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 424-443.
21. MOVELLAN, J. R., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (2001). The Morton-Massaro law of information integration: Implications for models of perception. Psychological Review, 108, 113-148.
22. NORRIS, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
23. NORRIS, D., MCQUEEN, J. M., & CUTLER, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 299-370.
24. PROTOPAPAS, A. (1999). Connectionist modeling of speech perception. Psychological Bulletin, 125,410-436.
25. SAMUEL, A. G., & PITT, M. A. (2003). Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 416-434.