Mechanosensitive membrane channels in action

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 94, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 2994-3002

  Yefimov, Serge ^a   Van Der Giessen, Erik ^a   Onck, Patrick R ^a   Marrink, Siewert J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEIN; ION CHANNEL; MSCL PROTEIN, E COLI;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL MEMBRANE; CHANNEL GATING; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LIPID BILAYER; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANORECEPTOR; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

CELL MEMBRANE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; ION CHANNEL GATING; ION CHANNELS; LIPID BILAYERS; MECHANORECEPTORS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 43149103416     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.119966     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Hamill, O. P., and B. Martinac. 2001. Molecular basis of mechanotransduction in living cells. Physiol. Rev. 81:685-740.
2. Ajouz, B., C. Berrier, A. Garrigues, M. Besnard, and A. Ghazi. 1998. Release of thioredoxin via the mechanosensitive channel MscL during osmotic downshock of Escherichia coli cells. J. Biol. Chem. 273:26670-26674.
3. Moe, P. C., G. Levin, and P. Blount. 2000. Correlating a protein structure with function of a bacterial mechanosensitive channel. J. Biol. Chem. 275:31121-31127.
4. Sukharev, S., P. Blount, B. Martinac, H. R. Guy, and C. Kung. 1996. MscL: a mechanosensitive channel in Escherichia coli. Soc. Gen. Physiol. Ser. 51:133-141.
5. Sukharev, S., M. Betanzos, C. S. Chiang, and H. R. Guy. 2001. The gating mechanism of the large mechanosensitive channel MscL. Nature. 409:720-724.
6. Perozo, E., D. M. Cortes, P. Sompornpisut, A. Kloda, and B. Martinac. 2002. Open channel structure of MscL and the gating mechanism of mechanosensitive channels. Nature. 418:942-948.
7. Moe, P., and P. Blount. 2005. Assessment of potential stimuli for mechano-dependent gating of MscL: effects of pressure, tension, and lipid headgroups. Biochemistry. 44:12239-12244.
8. Cruickshank, C. C., R. F. Minchin, A. C. Le Dain, and B. Martinac. 1997. Estimation of the pore size of the large-conductance mechanosensitive ion channel of Escherichia coli. Biophys. J. 73:1925-1931.
9. Sukharev, S. I., W. J. Sigurdson, C. Kung, and F. Sachs. 1999. Energetic and spatial parameters for gating of the bacterial large conductance mechanosensitive channel, MscL. J. Gen. Physiol. 113:525-539.
10. Hase, C. C., A. C. Le Dain, and B. Martinac. 1995. Purification and functional reconstitution of the recombinant large mechanosensitive ion channel (MscL) of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 270:18329-18334.
11. Maurer, J. A., D. E. Elmore, H. A. Lester, and D. A. Dougherty. 2000. Comparing and contrasting Escherichia coli and Mycobacterium tuberculosis mechanosensitive channels (MscL). New gain of function mutations in the loop region. J. Biol. Chem. 275:22238-22244.
12. Maurer, J. A., and D. A. Dougherty. 2001. A high-throughput screen for MscL channel activity and mutational phenotyping. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1514:165-169.
13. Chang, G., R. H. Spencer, A. T. Lee, M. T. Barclay, and D. C. Rees. 1998. Structure of the MscL homolog from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a gated mechanosensitive ion channel. Science. 282:2220-2226.
14. Elmore, D. E., and D. A. Dougherty. 2001. Molecular dynamics simulations of wild-type and mutant forms of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis MscL channel. Biophys. J. 81:1345-1359.
15. Colombo, G., S. J. Marrink, and A. E. Mark. 2003. Simulation of MscL gating in a bilayer under stress. Biophys. J. 84:2331-2337.
16. Gullingsrud, J., D. Kosztin, and K. Schulten. 2001. Structural determinants of MscL gating studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys. J. 80:2074-2081.
17. Gullingsrud, J., and K. Schulten. 2003. Gating of MscL studied by steered molecular dynamics. Biophys. J. 85:2087-2099.
18. Sukharev, S., S. R. Durell, and H. R. Guy. 2001. Structural models of the MscL gating mechanism. Biophys. J. 81:917-936.
19. Betanzos, M., C. S. Chiang, H. R. Guy, and S. Sukharev. 2002. Large iris-like expansion of a mechanosensitive channel protein induced by membrane tension. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:704-710.
20. Kong, Y., Y. Shen, T. E. Warth, and J. Ma. 2002. Conformational pathways in the gating of Escherichia coli mechanosensitive channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:5999-6004.
21. Markin, V. S., and J. P. Albanesi. 2002. Membrane fusion: stalk model revisited. Biophys. J. 82:693-712.
22. Wiggins, P., and R. Phillips. 2004. Analytic models for mechanotransduction: gating a mechanosensitive channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:4071-4076.
23. Y. Tang, G. Coa, X. Chen, J. Yoo, A. Yething, and Q. Ciu. 2006. A finite element framework for studying the mechanical response of macromolecules: application to the gating of the mechanosensitive channel MscL. Biophys. J. 91:1248-1263.
24. Marrink, S. J., A. H. de Vries, and A. E. Mark. 2004. Coarse-grained model for semiquantitative lipid simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B. 108:750-760.
25. Marrink, S. J., H. J. Risselada, S. Yefimov, D. P. Tieleman, and A. H. de Vries. 2007. The MARTINI forcefield: coarse-grained model for biomolecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B. 111:7812-7824.
26. Rand, R. P., and V. A. Parsegian. 1989. Hydration forces between phospholipid bilayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 988:351-376.
27. Marrink, S. J., and A. E. Mark. 2004. Molecular view of hexagonal phase formation in phospholipid membranes. Biophys. J. 87:3894-3900.
28. Shih, A. Y., A. Arkhipov, P. L. Freddolino, and K. Schulten. 2006. Coarse-grained protein-lipid model with application to lipoprotein particles. J. Phys. Chem. B. 110:3674-3684.
29. Bond, P. J., and M. S. P. Sansom. 2006. Insertion and assembly of membrane proteins via simulation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128:2697-2704.
30. Periole, X., T. Huber, S. J. Marrink, and T. P. Sakmar. 2007. G protein-coupled receptors self-assemble in dynamics simulations of model bilayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129:10126-10132.
31. Radzicka, A., and R. Wolfenden. 1988. Comparing the polarities of amino acids: side chain distribution coefficients between the vapor phase, cyclohexane, 1-octanol, and neutral aqueous solution. Biochemistry. 27:1664-1670.
32. Wolfenden, R., L. Andersson, P. Cullis, and C. Southgate. 1981. Affinities of amino-acid side chains for solvent water. Biochemistry. 20:849-855.
33. Lindahl, E., B. Hess, and D. van der Spoel. 2001. GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J. Mol. Model. 7:306-317.
34. Smart, O. S., J. G. Neduvelil, X. Wang, B. A. Wallace, and M. S. P. Sansom. 1996. HOLE: a program for the analysis of the pore dimensions of ion channel structural models. J. Mol. Graph. 14:354-360.
35. Berendsen, H. J. C., J. P. M. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, A. DiNola, and J. R. Haak. 1984. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81:3684-3689.
36. White, S. H. 1980. Small phospholipid vesicles: internal pressure, surface tension, and surface free energy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 77:4048-4050.
37. Oakley, A. J., B. Martinac, and M. C. Wilce. 1999. Structure and function of the bacterial mechanosensitive channel of large conductance. Protein Sci. 8:1915-1921.
38. Elmore, D. E., and D. A. Dougherty. 2003. Investigating lipid composition effects on the mechanosensitive channel of large conductance (MscL) using molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys. J. 85:1512-1524.
39. Zhelev, D. V., and D. Needham. 1993. Tension stabilized pores in giant vesicles: determination of pore size and pore line tension. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1147:89-104.
40. Evans, E., and V. Heinrich. 2003. Dynamic strength of fluid membranes. Compte Rendus. 4:265-274.
41. Leontiadou, H., A. E. Mark, and S. J. Marrink. 2004. Molecular dynamics simulations of hydrophilic pores in lipid bilayers. Biophys. J. 86:2156-2164.
42. Shapolov, G., R. Bass, D. C. Rees, and H. A. Lester. 2003. Open-state disulfide crosslinking between Mycobacterium tuberculosis mechanosensitive channel subunits. Biophys. J. 84:2357-2365.
43. Iscla, I., G. Levin, R. Wray, and P. Blount. 2007. Disulfide trapping the mechanosensitive MscL into a gating-transition state. Biophys. J. 92:1224-1232.
44. Spencer, R. H., G. Chang, and D. C. Rees. 1999. Pulling the plug: structural insights on a gated mechanosensitive channel. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9:448-454.
45. Batiza, A. F., I. Rayment, and C. Kung. 1999. Channel gate! Tension, leak and disclosure. Structure. 7:99-103.
46. Hille, B. 1968. Charges and potentials at the nerve surface. Divalent ions and pH. J. Gen. Physiol. 51:199-219.
47. Van den Bogaart, G., V. Krasnikov, and B. Poolman. 2007. Dual-color fluorescence-burst analysis to probe protein efflux through the mechanosensitive channel MscL. Biophys. J. 92:1233-1240.
48. Perozo, E., A. Kloda, D. M. Cortes, and B. Martinac. 2002. Physical principles underlying the transduction of bilayer deformation forces during mechanosensitive channel gating. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:696-703.
49. Cantor, R. S. 1999. Lipid composition and the lateral pressure profile in bilayers. Biophys. J. 76:2625-2639.
50. Gullingsrud, J., and K. Schulten. 2004. Lipid bilayer pressure profiles and mechanosensitive channel gating. Biophys. J. 86:3496-3509.
51. Niemela, P. S., S. Ollila, M. T. Hyvonen, M. Karttunen, and I. Vattulainen. 2007. Assessing the nature of lipid raft membranes. PLOS Comp. Biol. 3:304-312.
52. Meyer, G. R., J. Gullingsrud, K. Schulten, and B. Martinac. 2006. Molecular dynamics study of MscL interactions with a curved lipid bilayer. Biophys. J. 91:1630-1637.
53. Marrink, S. J., and A. E. Mark. 2003. Molecular dynamics simulation of the formation, structure, and dynamics of small phospholipid vesicles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:15233-15242.
54. Ursell, T., K. C. Huang, E. Peterson, and R. Phillips. 2007. Cooperative and spatial organization of membrane proteins through elastic interactions. PLOS Comp. Biol. 3:803-812.