Peer coaching: Professional development for experienced faculty

Innovative Higher Education

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 5-20

  Huston, Therese ^a   Weaver, Carol L ^a  

^a SEATTLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Experienced faculty; Faculty development; Peer coaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 43049095681     PISSN: 07425627     EISSN: 15731758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10755-007-9061-9     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Alstete, J. W. (2000). Posttenure faculty development: Building a system for faculty improvement and appreciation. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 27(4). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers, (2nd edn.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3. Ashenfelter, O., & Card, D. (2002). Did the elimination of mandatory retirement affect faculty retirement? The American Economic Review, 92, 957-980.
4. Austin, A. E. (2003). Creating a bridge to the future: Preparing new faculty to face changing expectations in a shifting context. Review of Higher Education, 26, 119-144.
5. Baker, A. C., Jensen, P. A., & Kolb, D. A. (2002). Conversational learning. An experiential approach to knowledge creation. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
6. Bernstein, D. J., Johnson, J., & Smith, K. (2000). An examination of the implementation of peer review of teaching. In K. E. Ryan (Ed.), Evaluating teaching in higher education (pp.73-86). New directions for teaching and learning, vol. 83. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7. Boyle, P., & Boice, R. (1998). Systematic mentoring for new faculty teachers and graduate teaching assistants. Innovative Higher Education, 22, 157-179.
8. Brancato, V. C. (2003). Professional development in higher education. In K. P. King & P. A. Lawler (Eds.), New perspectives on designing and implementing professional development of teachers of adults (pp. 59-65). New directions for adult and continuing education, vol. 98. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9. Brinko, K. T. (1993). The practice of giving feedback to improve teaching: What is effective? Journal of Higher Education, 64, 574-593.
10. Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. Carroll, J. G., & Goldberg, S. R. (1989). Teaching consultations: A collegial approach to better teaching. College Teaching, 37, 143-146.
12. Cataldi, E. F., Bradburn, E. M., & Fahimi, M. (2005). 2004 national study of postsecondary faculty (NSOPF:04): Background characteristics, work activities, and compensation of instructional faculty and staff. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
13. Cavanagh, R. (1996). Formative and summative evaluation in the peer review of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 20, 235-240.
14. Centra, J. A. (1985). Maintaining faculty vitality through faculty development. In S. M. Clark & D. R. Lewis (Eds.), Faculty vitality and institutional productivity (pp. 141-156). New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College.
15. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, J. J. (1988). Nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
16. Chism, N. V. N. (1999). Peer review of teaching: A sourcebook. Boston, MA: Anker.
17. Crawley, A. L. (1995). Senior faculty renewal at research universities: Implications for academic policy development. Innovative Higher Education, 20, 71-94.
18. Daley, B. J. (2000). Learning in professional practice. In V. W. Mott & B. J. Daley (Eds.), Charting a course for continuing professional education: Reframing professional practice (pp. 33-42). New directions for adult and continuing education,vol. 86. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. A restatement of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath Company.
20. Erickson, G. (1986). A survey of faculty development practices. In M. Svinicki, J. Kurfiss & J. Stone (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional and organizational development, 5 (pp. 182-196). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
21. Franz, A. C., Beebe, S. A., Horvath, V. S., Canales, J., & Swee D. E. (2005). The role of teaching and learning centers. In S. Chadwick-Bossey & D. R. Robertson (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development, 23 (pp. 72-110). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
22. Hicks, O. (1999). A conceptual framework for instructional consultation. In C. Knapper & S. Piccinin (Eds.), Using consulting to improve teaching (pp.9-18). New directions for teaching and learning, vol. 79. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23. Hornum, B. (2002). Transforming post-tenure review into faculty, department head, and departmental renewal. In C. M. Lacata & J. C. Morreale (Eds.), Post-tenure faculty review and renewal: Experienced voices (pp. 155-166). Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education.
24. Hubball, H. T., & Burt, H. (2006). The scholarship of teaching and learning: Theory-Practice integration in a faculty certificate program. Innovative Higher Education, 30, 327-344.
25. Huber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2005). The advancement of learning: Building the teaching commons. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26. Hutchings, P. (1996). The peer review of teaching: Progress, issues and prospects. Innovative Higher Education, 20, 221-234.
27. Kane, R., Sandretto, S., & Heath, C. (2004). An investigation into excellent tertiary teaching: Emphasizing reflective practice. Higher Education, 47, 283-310.
28. I. Karpiak 2000 The "second call": Faculty renewal and recommitment at midlife Quality in Higher Education 6 2 125 134.
29. Karpiak, I. (2000). The "second call": Faculty renewal and recommitment at midlife. Quality in Higher Education, 6(2), 125-134. Retrieved March 16, 2007 from http://www.ebscohost.com
30. Keig, L., & Waggoner, M. D. (1994). Collaborative peer review: The role of faculty in improving college teaching. 1994 Report No. 2. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. Washington, DC: The George Washington University School of Education and Human Development.
31. Kreber, C., & Cranton, P. A. (2000). Exploring the scholarship of teaching. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 476-495.
32. Lacata, C. M., & Morreale, J. C. (Eds.). (2002). Post-tenure faculty review and renewal: Experienced voices. Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education.
33. Ma, J. (2004). Trends and issues: Recent trends in faculty demographics and employment patterns. TIA-CREF Institute. Retrieved February 20, 2007 from http://www.tia-crefinstitute.org/research/trends/tr110104.html
34. Malik, D. J. (1996). Peer review of teaching: External review of course content. Innovative Higher Education, 20, 277-286.
35. Menges, R. J. (1987). Colleagues as catalysts for change in teaching. In J. Kurfiss (Ed.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional and organizational development, 6 (pp. 83-93) Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
36. Menges, R. J., Mathis, B. C., Halliburton, D., Marincovich, M., & Svinicki, M. (1988). Strengthening professional development: Lessons from the program for faculty renewal at Stanford. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 291-304.
37. Miller, M. A. (1999). State-level post-tenure review policies. Innovative Higher Education, 24, 17-24.
38. Millis, B. J. (1999). Three practical considerations for peer consultations. In C. Knapper & S. Piccinin (Eds.), Using consulting to improve teaching (pp. 19-28). New directions for teaching and learning, vol. 79. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Fall.
39. Millis, B. J., & Kaplan, B. B. (1995). Enhancing teaching through peer classroom observations. In P. Seldin & Associates (Eds.), Improving college teaching (pp. 137-151). Bolton, MA: Anker.
40. Minor, J. F., & Preston, K. M. (1991, May). Peer coaching at the junior college level: Developing a non-threatening environment. Paper presented at the National Conference on the Adult Learner, Columbia, SC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED339410).
41. Mott, V. W. (2000). The development of professional expertise in the workplace. In V. W. Mott & B. J. Daley (Eds.), Charting a course for continuing professional education: Reframing professional practice (pp. 23-31). New directions for adult and continuing education, vol. 86. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
42. V. Mundy L. J. Grabau 1999 Planning for peer review of teaching. [Electronic Version] Journal of Natural Resources and Life Science Education 28 31-36
43. Mundy, V., & Grabau, L. J. (1999). Planning for peer review of teaching. [Electronic Version]. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Science Education, 28, 31-36. Retrieved January 10, 2007 from: http://www.jnrise.org
44. National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Digest of Education Statistics: 2005. (NCES 2006-030). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved Feb. 3, 2006 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d05/ tables/dt05_230.asp
45. National Research Council. (2003). Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. In M. A. Fox & N. Hackerman (Eds.), Center for education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
46. O'Meara, K. A., & Rice, R. E. (2005). Faculty priorities reconsidered: Rewarding multiple forms of scholarship. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
47. Quinlan, K. M., & Akerlind, G. S. (2000). Factors affecting departmental peer collaboration for faculty development: Two cases in context. Higher Education, 40, 23-52.
48. Romano, J. L., Hoesing, R., O'Donovan, K., & Weinsheimer, J. (2004). Faculty at mid-career: A program to enhance teaching and learning. Innovative Higher Education, 29, 21-48, Fall.
49. Schmuck, R. A. (1995). Process consultation and organizational development. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 6, 199-205.
50. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
51. Scriven, M. (1973). The methodology of evaluation. In B. Worthen & J. Sanders (Eds.), Educational evaluation: Theory and practice (pp. 60-104). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
52. Scriven, M. (1996). Types of evaluation and types of evaluator. American Journal of Education, 17(2), 151-161.
53. Seldin, P. (2006). Tailoring faculty development programs to faculty career stages. In S. Chadwick-Blossey & D. R. Robertson (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional and organizational development, 24, (pp. 137-146). Bolton, MA: Anker.
54. Skinner, M. E., & Welch, F. C. (1996). Peer coaching for better teaching. College Teaching, 44, 153-156.
55. Slater, C. L., & Simmons, D. L. (2001). The design and implementation of a peer coaching program. American Secondary Education, 29(3), 67-76, Spring.
56. Sorcinelli, M. D. (1999). Post-tenure review through post-tenure development: What linking senior faculty and technology taught us. Innovative Higher Education, 24, 61-72.
57. Sorcinelli, M. D., Austin, A. E., Eddy, P. L., & Beach, A. L. (2006). Creating the future of faculty development. Bolton, MA: Anker.
58. Vohra, N., & Singh, M. (2005). Mental traps to avoid while interpreting feedback: Insights from administering feedback to school principals. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16, 139-147.
59. Webb, J., & McEnerney, K. (1995). The view from the back of the classroom: A faculty-based peer observation program. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 6, 145-160.
60. Weimer, M. (1990). Improving college teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
61. Weimer, M. (2006). Enhancing scholarly work on teaching and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.