An examination of the implementation of peer review of teaching

New Directions for Teaching and Learning

Volumn 2000, Issue 83, 2000, Pages 73-86

  Bernstein, Daniel J ^a   Jonson, Jessica ^a   Smith, Karen ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856931443     PISSN: 02710633     EISSN: 15360768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tl.8306     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bernstein, D. J “A Departmental System for Balancing the Development and Evaluation of College Teaching.” Innovative Higher Education, 1996, 20, 241-248.
2. Cavanagh, R. R “Formative and Summative Evaluation in the Faculty Peer Review of Teaching.” Innovative Higher Education, 1996, 20, 235-240.
3. Cerbin, W “The Course Portfolio as a Tool for Continuous Improvement of Teaching and Learning.” Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1994, 5, 95-105.
4. Cerbin, W “Inventing a New Genre: The Course Portfolio at the University of Wisconsin- La Crosse.” In P. Hutchings (ed.), Making Teaching Community Property. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education, 1996.
5. Hutchings, P. (ed.). From Idea to Prototype: The Peer Review of Teaching. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education, 1995.
6. Hutchings, P “The Peer Review of Teaching: Progress, Issues, and Prospects.” Innovative Higher Education, 1996a, 20, 221-234.
7. Hutchings, P. (ed.). Making Teaching Community Property. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education, 1996b.
8. Hutchings, P. (ed.). The Course Portfolio. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education, 1998.
9. Kulik, C. C Kulik, J. A and Bangert-Drowns, R. L “Effectiveness of Mastery Learning Programs: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research, 1990, 60, 265-299.
10. Martin, D. C and Arendale, D. R. (eds.). Supplemental Instruction: Increasing Achievement and Retention. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, no. 60. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994.