Post-tenure review through post-tenure development: What linking senior faculty and technology taught us

Innovative Higher Education

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 61-72

  Sorcinelli, Mary Deane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43049130092     PISSN: 07425627     EISSN: 15731758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:IHIE.0000008146.68462.e5     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Bentley, R.J., & Blackburn, R.T. (1991). Changes in academic research performance over time: A study of institutional accumulative advantage. Research in Higher Education, 31, 327-353.
2. Blackburn R.T., & Lawrence, J.H. (1997). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
3. Brascamp, L.A., & Ory, J.C. (1994). Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and institutional performance. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
4. Butcher, A. (1997). TEACHnology: A guide to teaching technology resources at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Center For Teaching: University of Massachusetts Amherst.
5. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1989). Survey among college and university faculty. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
6. Chism, N, & Szabo, B. (1996). Who uses faculty development services? In L. Richlin (Ed.), To Improve the Academy, 16, (pp. 115-128). Stillwater OK: New Forums Press.
7. Dale, E. A. (1998). An assessment of a faculty development program at a research university. Unpublished dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
8. Eble, K.E., & McKeachie, W.J. (1985). Improving undergraduate education through faculty development. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
9. Finkelstein, M.J. & LaCelle-Peterson, M.W. (1993). Developing senior faculty as teachers. New directions for teaching and learning, No. 55. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
10. Galm, J.A. (1985). Welcome to post-tenure review. College Teaching, 33, 65-67.
11. Hutchings, P. (1996). Making teaching community property. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
12. Johnson, G.E. (1993). Post-tenure review: Practical considerations. Journal for Higher Education Management, 8 (2), 19-29.
13. Keig, L., & Waggoner, M.D. (1994). Collaborative peer review: The role of faculty in improving college teaching. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2. Washington DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
14. Licata, C. M. (June, 1998). Post-tenure review: Its meaning and purpose. AAHE Bulletin, 50 (10), 3-6.
15. Licata, C.M. & Morreale, J. C. (1997). Post-tenure Review: Policies, practices, precautions. New Pathways Working Paper, No. 12. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
16. Paulsen, M.B. & Feldman, K.A. (1995). Taking teaching seriously: Meeting the challenge of instructional improvement. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No 2, Washington DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
17. Rice, G. & Finkelstein, M. (1993). The senior faculty: A portrait and literature review. In M.J. Finkelstein & M.W. LaCelle-Peterson (EDS.), Developing senior faculty as teachers (pp. 5-14). New directions for teaching and learning, no. 55. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
18. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation (4th edition). New York: NY Free Press.
19. Sorcinelli, M.D. (1995). How mentoring programs can improve teaching. In P. Seldin and Associates, Improving college teaching (pp. 125-136). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
20. Sorcinelli, M.D., & Aitken, N. (1995). Improving teaching: Academic leaders and faculty developers as partners. In W.A. Wright and Associates. Teaching Improvement Practices (pp. 311-324). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
21. Sorcinelli, M.D. & Near, J. (1989). Relations between work and life away from work among university faculty. Journal of Higher Education 60 (1), 59-61.