A conceptual framework for instructional consultation

New Directions for Teaching and Learning

Volumn 1999, Issue 79, 1999, Pages 9-18

  Hicks, Owen ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 43049086053     PISSN: 02710633     EISSN: 15360768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tl.7902     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Brinko, K. T. “The Interactions of Teaching Improvement.” In K. T. Brinko and R. J. Menges (eds.), Practically Speaking: A Sourcebook for Instructional Consultants in Higher Education. Stillwater, Okla.: New Forums Press, 1997.
2. Brinko, K. T., and Menges, R. J. (eds.). Practically Speaking: A Sourcebook for Instructional Consultants in Higher Education. Stillwater, Okla.: New Forums Press, 1997.
3. Eaton, E., and Schmidt-Posner, J. “Towards Academic Excellence: A Study of Academic Staff Views About Feedback on Teaching and Values About Teaching and Research.” Unpublished report, prepared for the Academic Staff Development Committee, University of Western Australia, Perth, 1992.
4. Lenze, L. F. “Instructional Development: What Works?” National Education Association, Office of Higher Education Update, 1996, 2 (4), 1–4.
5. Menges, R. J., Weimer, M., and Associates. Teaching on Solid Ground: Using Scholarship to Improve Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996.
6. Roed, B. The Peer Consultation Program at the University of Alberta. Edmonton, Canada: University Teaching Services, University of Alberta, 1995.
7. Scott, D. C., and Weeks, P. “The TRAC Network: Cross-Disciplinary Teaching and Learning Research and Deliberation.” Paper presented at the International Consortium for Educational Development conference, Austin, Tex., Apr. 19–22, 1998.