Distractor P3 is associated with attentional capture by stimulus deviance

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 119, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1300-1309

  Sawaki, Risa ^a,b   Katayama, Jun'ichi ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Attentional capture; Cognitive interference; Distractor P3 (P3a); Stimulus deviance; Task difficulty; Three stimulus oddball paradigm

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 42749091519     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.107     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Anllo-Vento L., Luck S.J., and Hillyard S.A. Spatio-temporal dynamics of attention to color: evidence from human electrophysiology. Hum Brain Mapp 6 (1998) 216-238
2. Bacon W.F., and Egeth H.E. Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Percept Psychophys 55 (1994) 485-496
3. Combs L.A., and Polich J. P3a from auditory white noise stimuli. Clin Neurophysiol 117 (2006) 1106-1112
4. Comerchero M.D., and Polich J. P3a, perceptual distinctiveness, and stimulus modality. Cogn Brain Res 7 (1998) 41-48
5. Comerchero M.D., and Polich J. P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli. Clin Neurophysiol 110 (1999) 24-30
6. Courchesne E., Hillyard S.A., and Galambos R. Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 39 (1975) 131-143
7. Crottaz-Herbette S., and Menon V. Where and when the anterior cingulate cortex modulates attentional response: combined fMRI and ERP evidence. J Cogn Neurosci 18 (2006) 766-780
8. Cycowicz Y.M., and Friedman D. A developmental study of the effect of temporal order on the ERPs elicited by novel environmental sounds. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 103 (1997) 304-318
9. Czigler I., Balázs L., and Winkler I. Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual changes. Psychophysiology 39 (2002) 869-873
10. Dalton P., and Lavie N. Temporal attentional capture: effects of irrelevant singletons on rapid serial visual search. Psychon Bull Rev 13 (2006) 881-885
11. Demiralp T., Ademoglu A., Comerchero M., and Polich J. Wavelet analysis of P3a and P3b. Brain Topogr 13 (2001) 251-267
12. Desimone R., and Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 18 (1995) 193-222
13. Dien J., Spencer K.M., and Donchin E. Parsing the late positive complex: mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300. Psychophysiology 41 (2004) 665-678
14. Donchin E. Surprise! ... Surprise?. Psychophysiology 18 (1981) 493-513
15. Egeth H.E., and Yantis S. Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. Annu Rev Psychol 48 (1997) 269-297
16. Eriksen B.A., and Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys 16 (1974) 143-149
17. Escera C., Alho K., Winkler I., and Näätänen R. Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. J Cogn Neurosci 10 (1998) 590-604
18. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., and Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18 (1992) 1030-1044
19. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., and Gaeta H. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25 (2001) 355-373
20. Goldstein A., Spencer K.M., and Donchin E. The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3. Psychophysiology 39 (2002) 781-790
21. Grillon C., Courchesne E., Ameli R., Elmasian R., and Braff D. Effects of rare non-target stimuli on brain electrophysiological activity and performance. Int J Psychophysiol 9 (1990) 257-267
22. Gumenyuk V., Korzyukov O., Escera C., Hämäläinen M., Huotilainen M., Häyrinen T., et al. Electrophysiological evidence of enhanced distractibility in ADHD children. Neurosci Lett 374 (2005) 212-217
23. Hagen G.F., Gatherwright J.R., Lopez B.A., and Polich J. P3a from visual stimuli: task difficulty effects. Int J Psychophysiol 59 (2006) 8-14
24. Howell D.C. Statistical methods for psychology (2007), Thomson Wadworth, Belmont, CA
25. Jeon Y.W., and Polich J. P3a from a passive visual stimulus task. Clin Neurophysiol 112 (2001) 2202-2208
26. Kastner S., and Ungerleider L.G. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 23 (2000) 315-341
27. Katayama J., and Polich J. P300 from one-, two-, and three-stimulus auditory paradigms. Int J Psychophysiol 23 (1996) 33-40
28. Katayama J., and Polich J. P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 100 (1996) 555-562
29. Katayama J., and Polich J. Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b. Psychophysiology 35 (1998) 23-33
30. Katayama J., and Polich J. Auditory and visual P300 topography from a 3 stimulus paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol 110 (1999) 463-468
31. Kimura M., Katayama J., and Murohashi H. Positive difference in ERPs reflects independent processing of visual changes. Psychophysiology 42 (2005) 369-379
32. Knight R.T. Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection. Nature 383 (1996) 256-259
33. Kok A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 557-577
34. Lamy D., and Egeth H.E. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29 (2003) 1003-1020
35. Näätänen R. Attention and brain function (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
36. Näätänen R., Gaillard A.W., and Mäntysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol 42 (1978) 313-329
37. Nigg J.T., and Casey B.J. An integrative theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder based on the cognitive and affective neuroscience. Dev Psychopathol 17 (2005) 785-806
38. O'Craven K.M., Downing P.E., and Kanwisher N. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 401 (1999) 584-587
39. Pernet C., Valdois S., Celsis P., and Démonet J.-F. Lateral masking, levels of processing and stimulus category: a comparative study between normal and dyslexic readers. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 2374-2385
40. Pfefferbaum A., Ford J.M., Roth W.T., and Kopell B.S. Age-related changes in auditory event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 49 (1980) 266-276
41. Picton T.W. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J Clin Neurophysiol 9 (1992) 456-479
42. Polich J. Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 63 (1986) 251-259
43. Polich J. Overview of P3a and P3b. In: Polich J. (Ed). Detection of change: event-related potential and fMRI findings (2003), Kluwer Academic Press, Boston 83-98
44. Polich J., and Basho S. P3a and P3b auditory ERPs in HIV patients receiving anti-viral medication. Clin Electroencephalogr 33 (2002) 97-101
45. Polich J., and Comerchero M.D. P3a from visual stimuli: typicality, task, and topography. Brain Topogr 15 (2003) 141-152
46. Polich J., and Criado J.R. Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. Int J Psychophysiol 60 (2006) 172-185
47. Ridderinkhof K.R., Ullsperger M., Crone E.A., and Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 306 (2004) 443-447
48. Rushby J.A., Barry R.J., and Doherty R.J. Separation of the components of the late positive complex in an ERP dishabituation paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol 116 (2005) 2363-2380
49. Sawaki R., and Katayama J. Severity of AD/HD symptoms and efficiency of attentional resource allocation. Neurosci Lett 407 (2006) 86-90
50. Sawaki R., and Katayama J. Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information. Clin Neurophysiol 117 (2006) 2532-2539
51. Sawaki R., and Katayama J. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture for deviant information. Psychophysiology 44 (2007) 374-382
52. Schoenfeld M.A., Tempelmann C., Martinez A., Hopf J.M., Sattler C., Heinze H.J., et al. Dynamics of feature binding during object-selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 (2003) 11806-11811
53. Simons R.F., Graham F.K., Miles M.A., and Chen X. On the relationship of P3a and the Novelty-P3. Biol Psychol 56 (2001) 207-218
54. Sokolov E.N. Perception and the conditioned reflex (1963), Macmillan, New York
55. Spencer K.M., Dien J., and Donchin E. A componential analysis of the ERP elicited by novel events using a dense electrode array. Psychophysiology 36 (1999) 409-414
56. Spencer K.M., Dien J., and Donchin E. Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 343-358
57. Squires N.K., Squires K.C., and Hillyard S.A. Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 38 (1975) 387-401
58. Sutton S., Braren M., Zubin J., and John E.R. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 150 (1965) 1187-1188
59. Theeuwes J. Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Percept Psychophys 50 (1991) 184-193
60. Theeuwes J. Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20 (1994) 799-806
61. Verleger R. On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology 34 (1997) 131-156
62. Yamaguchi S., Tsuchiya H., Yamagata S., Toyoda G., and Kobayashi S. Event-related brain potentials in response to novel sounds in dementia. Clin Neurophysiol 111 (2000) 195-203
63. Yantis S., and Hillstrom A.P. Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20 (1994) 95-107
64. Yantis S., and Jonides J. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 10 (1984) 601-621