Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture for deviant information

Psychophysiology

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 374-382

  Sawaki, Risa ^a,b   Katayama, Jun'Ichi ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Attentional capture; Deviant processing; Discrimination difficulty; P300; P3a; P3b

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN FUNCTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COLOR PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBABILITY LEARNING; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 34247131310     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00506.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Azizian, A., Freitas, A. L., Watson, T. D., & Squires, N. K. (2006). Electrophysiological correlates of categorization: P300 amplitude as index of target similarity. Biological Psychology, 71, 278-288.
2. Berti, S., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2004). Bottom-up influences on working memory: Behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength. Experimental Psychology, 51, 249-257.
3. Bokura, H., Yamaguchi, S., & Kobayashi, S. (2001). Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 2224-2232.
4. Combs, L. A., & Polich, J. (2006). P3a from auditory white noise stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 1106-1112.
5. Comerchero, M. D., & Polich, J. (1998). P3a, perceptual distinctiveness, and stimulus modality. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 41-48.
6. Comerchero, M. D., & Polich, J. (1999). P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 24-30.
7. Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Courchesne, R. Y. (1977). P3 wave to the discrimination of targets in homogeneous and heterogeneous stimulus sequences. Psychophysiology, 14, 590-597.
8. Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1975). Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 131-143.
9. Cycowicz, Y. M., & Friedman, D. (2004). The old switcheroo: When target environmental sounds elicit a novelty P3. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1359-1367.
10. Debener, S., Makeig, S., Delorme, A., & Engel, A. K. (2005). What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 309-321.
11. Demiralp, T., Ademoglu, A., Comerchero, M., & Polich, J. (2001). Wavelet analysis of P3a and P3b. Brain Topography, 13, 251-267.
12. Dien, J., Spencer, K.M., & Donchin, E. (2004). Parsing the late positive complex: Mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300. Psychophysiology, 41, 665-678.
13. Duncan-Johnson, C. C., & Donchin, E. (1977). On quantifying surprise: The variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology, 14, 456-467.
14. Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590-604.
15. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847-858.
16. Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y.M., & Gaeta,H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355-373.
17. Gaeta, H., Friedman, D., & Hunt, G. (2003). Stimulus characteristics and task category dissociate the anterior and posterior aspects of the novelty P3. Psychophysiology, 40, 198-208.
18. Goldstein, A., Spencer, K. M., & Donchin, E. (2002). The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3. Psychophysiology, 39, 781-790.
19. Grillon, C., Courchesne, E., Ameli, R., Elmasian, R., & Braff, D. (1990). Effects of rare non-target stimuli on brain electrophysiological activity and performance. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 257-267.
20. Gumenyuk, V., Korzyukov, O., Escera, C., Hämäläinen, M., Huotilainen, M., Häyrinen, T., et al. (2005). Electrophysiological evidence of enhanced distractibility in ADHD children. Neuroscience Letters, 374, 212-217.
21. Hagen, G. F., Gatherwright, J. R., Lopez, B. A., & Polich, J. (2006). P3a from visual stimuli: Task difficulty effects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 59, 8-14.
22. Katayama, J., & Polich, J. (1996a). P300 from one-, two-, and threestimulus auditory paradigms. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 23, 33-40.
23. Katayama, J., & Polich, J. (1996b). P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 100, 555-562.
24. Katayama, J., & Polich, J. (1998). Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b. Psychophysiology, 35, 23-33.
25. Katayama, J., & Polich, J. (1999). Auditory and visual P300 topography from a 3 stimulus paradigm. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 463-468.
26. Kok, A. (2001). On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology, 38, 557-577.
27. Kok, A., Ramautar, J. R., De Ruiter, M. B., Band, G. P. H., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2004). ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task. Psychophysiology, 41, 9-20.
28. Pfefferbaum, A., Ford, J. M., Roth, W. T., & Kopell, B. S. (1980). Agerelated changes in auditory event-related potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 49, 266-276.
29. Pfefferbaum, A., Ford, J. M.,Weller, B. J., & Kopell, B. S. (1985). ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 423-434.
30. Picton, T. W. (1992). The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 9, 456-479.
31. Polich, J. (1986). Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 63, 251-259.
32. Polich, J. (2003). Overview of P3a and P3b. In J. Polich (Ed.), Detection of change: Event-related potential and fMRI findings (pp. 83-98). Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
33. Polich, J., & Comerchero, M. D. (2003). P3a from visual stimuli: Typicality, task, and topography. Brain Topography, 15, 141-152.
34. Polich, J., & Criado, J. R. (2006). Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 172-185.
35. Ramautar, J. R., Kok, A.,& Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2004). Effects of stopsignal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: The N2/P3 complex further validated. Brain and Cognition, 56, 234-252.
36. Ramautar, J. R., Kok, A.,& Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2006). Effects of stopsignal modality on the N2/P3 complex elicited in the stop-signal paradigm. Biological Psychology, 72, 96-109.
37. Roberts, L. E., Rau, H., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (1994). Mapping P300 waves onto inhibition: Go/no-go discrimination. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 44-55.
38. Rushby, J. A., Barry, R. J., & Doherty, R. J. (2005). Separation of the components of the late positive complex in an ERP dishabituation paradigm. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 2363-2380.
39. Sabri, M., Liebenthal, E.,Waldron, E. J., Medler, D. A., & Binder, J. R. (2006). Attentional modulation in the detection of irrelevant deviance: A simultaneous ERP/fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 689-700.
40. Sawaki, R., & Katayama, J. (2006a). Severity of AD/HD symptoms and efficiency of attentional resource allocation. Neuroscience Letters, 407, 86-90.
41. Sawaki, R., & Katayama, J. (2006b). Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 2532-2539.
42. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 71-87.
43. Simons, R. F., Graham, F. K., Miles, M. A., & Chen, X. (2001). On the relationship of P3a and the novelty-P3. Biological Psychology, 56, 207-218.
44. Simson, R., Vaughan, H. G. Jr., & Ritter, W. (1977). The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual Go/NoGo tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 43, 864-875.
45. Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. New York: Macmillan.
46. Spencer, K. M., Dien, J., & Donchin, E. (1999). A componential analysis of the ERP elicited by novel events using a dense electrode array. Psychophysiology, 36, 409-414.
47. Spencer, K. M., Dien, J., & Donchin, E. (2001). Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. Psychophysiology, 38, 343-358.
48. Squires, N. K., Squires, K. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 387-401.
49. Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J.,&John, E. R. (1965). Evoked-potential correlated of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 150, 1187-1188.
50. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 184-193.
51. Verleger, R. (1997). On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology, 34, 131-156.
52. Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 661-676.