P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Evoked Potentials

Volumn 100, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 555-562

  Katayama, Jun'ichi ^a   Polich, John ^b  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

auditory stimulus; event related potential (ERP); P300; probability; three tone paradigm

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0030293761     PISSN: 01685597     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-5597(96)95171-0     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Acosta, V.W. and Nasman, V.T. Effects of task decision on P300. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1992, 13: 37-44.
2. Beck, E.C., Swanson, C. and Dustman, R.E. Long latency components of the visual evoked potentials in man: effects of aging. Exp. Aging Res., 1980, 6: 523-545.
3. Courchesne, E. Changes in P3 waves with event repetition: long-term effects on scalp distribution and amplitude. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1978, 45: 754-766.
4. Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S.A. and Galambos, R. Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1975, 39: 131-143.
5. Courchesne, E., Courchesne, R.Y. and Hillyard, S.A. The effect of stimulus deviation on P3 waves to easily recognized stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 1978, 16: 189-199.
6. Courchesne, E., Kilman, B.A., Galambos, R. and Lincoln, A. Autism: processing of novel auditory information assessed by event-related brain potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1984, 59: 238-248.
7. Donchin, E. and Coles, M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav. Brain Sci., 1988, 11: 357-374.
8. Donchin, E., Karis, D., Bashore, T.R., Coles, M.G.H. and Gratton, G. Cognitive psychophysiology and human information processing. In: M.G.H. Coles, E. Donchin and S.W. Porges (Eds.), Psychophysiology: Systems, Processes, and Applications. Guilford Press, New York, 1986, pp. 244-267.
9. Duncan-Johnson, C.C. and Donchin, E. On quantifying surprise: the variation in event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology, 1977, 14: 456-467.
10. Fein, G. and Turetsky, B. P300 latency variability in normal elderly: effects of paradigm and measurement technique. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1989, 72: 384-394.
11. Friedman, D. and Simpson, G.V. ERP amplitude and scalp distribution to target and novel events: effects of temporal order in young, middle-aged and older adults. Cogn. Brain Res., 1994, 2: 49-63.
12. Friedman, D., Simpson, G. and Hamberger, M. Age-related changes in scalp topography to novel and target stimuli. Psychophysiology, 1993, 30: 383-396.
13. Grillon, C. and Ameli, R. P300 assessment of anxiety effects on processing novel stimuli. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1994, 17: 205-217.
14. Grillon, C., Courchesne, E., Ameli, R., Elmasian, R. and Braff, D. Effects of rare non-target stimuli on brain electrophysiological activity and performance. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1990, 9: 257-267.
15. Holdstock, J.S. and Rugg, M.D. Dissociation of auditory P300, differential brain response to target and novel non-target stimuli. In: H.-J. Heinze, T.F. Münte and G.R. Mangun (Eds.), New Developments in Event-Related Potentials. Birkhäuser, Boston, 1993, pp. 71-78.
16. Johnson, Jr., R. A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology, 1986, 23: 367-384.
17. Johnson, Jr., R. The amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related potential: review and synthesis. In: P.K. Ackles, J.R. Jennings and M.G.H. Coles (Eds.), Advances in Psychophysiology, Vol. 3. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1988, pp. 69-138.
18. Johnson, Jr., R. On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology, 1993, 30: 90-97.
19. Katayama, J. and Polich, J. P300 from one-, two-, and three-stimulus auditory paradigms. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1996, 23: 33-40.
20. Knight, R.T. Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1984, 59: 9-20.
21. Knight, R.T. Aging decreases auditory event-related potentials to unexpected stimuli in humans. Neurobiol. Aging, 1987, 8: 109-113.
22. Kutas, M., McCarthy, G. and Donchin, E. Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 1977, 197: 792-795.
23. Lew, G.S. and Polich, J. P300, habituation, and response mode. Physiol. Behav., 1993, 53: 111-117.
24. Magliero, A., Bashore, T., Coles, M.G.H. and Donchin, E. On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes. Psychophysiology, 1984, 21: 171-186.
25. McCarthy, G. and Wood, C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1985, 62: 203-208.
26. Pfefferbaum, A., Ford, J.M., Roth, W.T. and Kopell, B.S. Age-related changes in auditory event-related potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1980, 49: 266-276.
27. Pfefferbaum, A., Ford, J.M., Wenegrat, B.G., Roth, W.T. and Kopell, B.S. Clinical application of the P3 component of event-related potentials, I: normal aging. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1984, 59: 85-103.
28. Polich, J. Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 63: 251-259.
29. Polich, J. Task difficulty, probability, and inter-stimulus interval as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1987a, 68: 311-320.
30. Polich, J. Response mode and P300 from auditory stimuli. Biol. Psychol., 1987b, 25: 61-71.
31. Polich, J. Habituation of P300 from auditory stimuli. Psychobiology, 1989, 17: 19-28.
32. Polich, J. P300, probability, and interstimulus interval. Psychophysiology, 1990, 27: 396-403.
33. Polich, J. Cognitive brain potentials. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., 1993a, 2: 175-179.
34. Polich, J. P300 in clinical applications: meaning, method, and measurement. In: E. Niedermeyer and F.L. Da Silva (Eds.), Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields, 3rd edn. Williams and Wilkins. Baltimore, 1993b, pp. 1005-1018.
35. Polich, J. Meta-analysis of P300 normative aging studies. Psychophysiology, 1996, 33: 334-353.
36. Polich, J. and Heine, M.R.D. P300 topography and modality effects from a single stimulus paradigm. Psychophysiology, 1996, in press.
37. Polich, J. and Kok, A. Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review. Biol. Psychol., 1995, 41: 103-146.
38. Polich, J., Eischen, S.E. and Collins, G.E. P300 from a single auditory stimulus. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1994, 92: 253-261.
39. Pritchard, W.S. Subjective probability and stimulus meaning: additive or interactive effects on P300 amplitude? J. Psychophysiol., 1989, 3: 259-268.
40. Rugg, M.D., Pickles, C.D., Potter, D.D., Doyle, M.C., Pentland, B. and Roberts, R.C. Cognitive brain potentials in a three-stimulus auditory 'oddball' task after closed head injury. Neuropsychologia, 1993, 31: 373-393.
41. Squires, N.K., Squires, K.C. and Hillyard, S.A. Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1975, 38: 387-401.
42. Verleger, R. and Berg, P. The waltzing oddball. Psychophysiology, 1991, 28: 468-477.
43. Yamaguchi, S. and Knight, R.T. P300 generation by novel somatosensory stimuli. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 78: 50-55.