P3a, perceptual distinctiveness, and stimulus modality

Cognitive Brain Research

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 41-48

  Comerchero, Marco D ^a   Polich, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory visual stimulus; Event related potential (ERP); P300, P3a, P3b; Stimulus context; Stimulus distinctiveness; Three stimulus paradigm

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ELECTRODES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; GENERALIZATION, STIMULUS; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0031685236     PISSN: 09266410     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00009-3     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. P. Baudena, E. Halgren, G. Heit, J.M. Clarke, Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli: III. Frontal cortex, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 94 (1995) 251-264.
2. M.D. Comerchero, J. Polich, P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol, 1998, manuscript submitted for publication.
3. E. Courchesne, Changes in P3 waves with event repetition: long-term effects on scalp distribution and amplitude, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 45 (1978) 754-766.
4. E. Courchesne, R.Y. Courchesne, S.A. Hillyard, The effect of stimulus deviation on P3 waves to easily recognized stimuli, Neuropsychologia 16 (1978) 189-199.
5. E. Courchesne, S.A. Hillyard, R. Galambos, Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 39 (1975) 131-143.
6. E. Courchesne, B.A. Kilman, R. Galambos, A. Lincoln, Autism: processing of novel auditory information assessed by event-related brain potentials, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 59 (1984) 238-248.
7. E. Donchin, M.G.H. Coles, Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?, Behav. Brain Sci. 11 (1988) 357-374.
8. J.M. Ford, E.V. Sullivan, L. Marsh, P.M. White, K.O. Lim, A. Pfefferbaum, The relationship between P300 amplitude and regional gray matter volumes depends upon the attentional system engaged, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 90 (1994) 214-228.
9. D. Friedman, G.V. Simpson, ERP amplitude and scalp distribution to target and novel events: effects of temporal order in young, middle-aged and older adults, Cogn. Brain Res. 2 (1994) 49-63.
10. D. Friedman, G. Simpson, M. Hamberger, Age related changes in scalp topography to rare and target stimuli, Psychophysiology 30 (1993) 383-396.
11. C. Grillon, E. Courchesne, R. Ameli, R. Elmasian, D. Braff, Effects of rare non-target stimuli on brain electrophysiological activity and performance, Int. J. Psychophysiol. 9 (1990) 257-267.
12. E. Halgren, P. Baudena, J. Clarke, G. Heit, L. Liégeois, P. Chauvel, A. Musolino, Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli: I. Superior temporal plane and parietal lobe, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 94 (1995) 191-220.
13. E. Halgren, P. Baudena, J. Clarke, G. Heit, K. Marinkovic, B. Devaux, J.-P. Vignal, A. Biraben, Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli: II. Medial, lateral and posterior temporal lobe, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 94 (1995) 229-250.
14. R. Johnson, The amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related potential: review and synthesis, in: P. Ackles, J.R. Jennings, M.G.H. Coles (Eds.), Advances in Psychophysiology: A Research Annual, Vol. 3, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1988, pp. 69-138.
15. R. Johnson, On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential, Psychophysiology 30 (1993) 90-97.
16. J. Katayama, J. Polich, P300 from one-, two-, and three-stimulus auditory paradigms, Int. J. Psychophysiol. 23 (1996) 33-40.
17. J. Katayama, J. Polich, P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 100 (1996) 555-562.
18. J. Katayama, J. Polich, Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b, Psychophysiology 35 (1998) 23-33.
19. R.T. Knight, Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 59 (1984) 9-20.
20. R.T. Knight, Neural mechanisms of event-related potentials from human lesion studies, in: J. Rohrbaugh, R. Parasuraman, R. Johnson (Eds.), Event-related Brain Potentials: Basic Issues and Applications, Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1990, pp. 3-18.
21. R.T. Knight, Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection, Nature 383 (1996) 256-259.
22. R.T. Knight, Distributed cortical network for visual attention, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9 (1997) 75-91.
23. G. McCarthy, M. Luby, J. Gore, P. Goldman-Rakic, Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI, J. Neurophysiol. 77 (1997) 1630-1634.
24. G. McCarthy, C.C. Wood, Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62 (1985) 203-208.
25. R. Mertens, J. Polich, P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: passive versus active tasks and stimulus modality, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 104 (1997) 488-497.
26. J.V. Pardo, P. Fox, M. Raichle, Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography, Nature 349 (1991) 61-64.
27. A. Pfefferbaum, J.M. Ford, ERPs to stimuli requiring response production and inhibition: effects of age, probability and visual noise, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 71 (1988) 55-63.
28. A. Pfefferbaum, J.M. Ford, W.T. Roth, B.S. Kopell, Age-related changes in auditory event-related potentials, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 49 (1980) 266-276.
29. T.W. Picton, The P300 wave of the human event-related potential, J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 9 (1992) 456-479.
30. J. Polich, P300 clinical utility and control of variability, J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 15 (1998) 14-33.
31. J. Polich, J.E. Alexander, L.O. Bauer, S. Kuperman, J. Rohrbaugh, S. Morzorati, S.J. O'Connor, B. Porjesz, H. Begleiter, P300 topography of amplitude/latency correlations, Brain Topogr. 9 (1997) 275-282.
32. J. Polich, L.D. Hoffman, P300 and handedness: possible corpus callosal contributions to ERPs, Psychophysiology, 1998, in press.
33. J. Polich, L.R. Squires, P300 from amnesic patients with bilateral hippocampal lesions, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 86 (1993) 408-417.
34. M.I. Posner, Attention as a cognitive and neural system, Cur. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 1 (1992) 11-14.
35. M.I. Posner, S.E. Petersen, The attention system of the human brain, Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 13 (1990) 25-42.
36. G.F. Potts, M. Liotti, D.M. Tucker, M.I. Posner, Frontal and inferior temporal cortical activity in visual target detection: evidence from high spatially sampled event-related potentials, Brain Topogr. 9 (1996) 3-14.
37. L.E. Roberts, H. Rau, W. Lutzenberger, N. Birbaumer, Mapping P300 waves onto inhibition: go/no-go discrimination, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 92 (1994) 44-55.
38. N.K. Squires, K.C. Squires, S.A. Hillyard, Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 38 (1975) 387-401.
39. M.N. Verbaten, M.A. Huyben, C. Kemner, Processing capacity and the frontal P3, Int. J. Psychophysiol. 25 (1997) 237-248.
40. R. Verleger, W. Heide, C. Butt, D. Kömpf, Reduction of P3b in patients with temporo-parietal lesions, Cogn. Brain Res. 2 (1994) 102-116.
41. S. Yamaguchi, R.T. Knight, P300 generation by novel somatosensory stimuli, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 78 (1991) 50-55.
42. S. Yamaguchi, R.T. Knight, Effects of temporal-parietal lesions on the somatosensory P3 to lower limb stimulation, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 84 (1992) 139-148.