P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 110, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 24-30

  Comerchero, Marco D ^a   Polich, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory visual stimuli; Event related potential (ERP); P300; P3a; P3b; Stimulus context; Three stimulus paradigm

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; BRAIN; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032897728     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00033-1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Courchesne E. Changes in P3 waves with event repetition: Long-term effects on scalp distribution and amplitude. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 45:1978;754-766.
2. Courchesne E., Hillyard S.A., Galambos R. Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 39:1975;131-143.
3. Courchesne E., Courchesne R.Y., Hillyard S.A. The effect of stimulus deviation on P3 waves to easily recognized stimuli. Neuropsychologia. 16:1978;189-199.
4. Courchesne E., Kilman B.A., Galambos R., Lincoln A. Autism: Processing of novel auditory information assessed by event-related brain potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 59:1984;238-248.
5. Donchin E., Coles M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav. Brain Sci. 11:1988;357-374.
6. Ford J.M., Sullivan E.V., Marsh L., White P.M., Lim K.O., Pfefferbaum A. The relationship between P300 amplitude and regional gray matter volumes depends upon the attentional system engaged. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 90:1994;228.
7. Friedman D., Simpson G.V. ERP amplitude and scalp distribution to target and novel events: Effects of temporal order in young, middle-aged and older adults. Cogn. Brain Res. 2:1994;49-63.
8. Friedman D., Simpson G., Hamberger M. Age related changes in scalp topography to rare and target stimuli. Psychophysiology. 30:1993;383-396.
9. Grillon C., Courchesne E., Ameli R., Elmasian R., Braff D. Effects of rare non-target stimuli on brain electrophysiological activity and performance. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 9:1990;257-267.
10. Halgren, E., Baudena, P., Clarke, J., Heit, G., Liégeois, Chauvel, P. and Musolino, A. Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. I. Superior temporal plane and parietal lobe. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1995a, 94: 191-220.
11. Halgren, E., Baudena, P., Clarke, J., Heit, G., Marinkovic, K., Devaux, B., Vignal, J.-P. and Biraben, A. Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. II. Medial, lateral and posterior temporal lobe. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1995b, 94: 229-250.
12. Johnson, R. The amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related potential: Review and synthesis. In: P. Ackles, J.R. Jennings and M.G.H. Coles (Eds.), Advances in Psychophysiology: A Research Annual, Vol. 3. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1988, pp. 69-138.
13. Johnson R. On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology. 30:1993;90-97.
14. Katayama, J. and Polich, J. P300 from one-, two-, and three-stimulus auditory paradigms. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1996a, 23: 33-40.
15. Katayama, J. and Polich, J. P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1996b, 100: 555-562.
16. Katayama J., Polich J. Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b. Psychophysiology. 35:1998;23-33.
17. Knight R.T. Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 59:1984;9-20.
18. Knight, R.T. Neural mechanisms of event-related potentials from human lesion studies. In: J. Rohrbaugh, R. Parasuraman and R. Johnson (Eds.), Event-related Brain Potentials: Basic Issues and Applications. Oxford University Press, New York, 1990, pp. 3-18.
19. Knight R.T. Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection. Nature. 383:1996;256-259.
20. Knight R.T. Distributed cortical network for visual attention. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9:1997;75-91.
21. Mertens R., Polich J. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: Passive versus active tasks and stimulus modality. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 104:1997;488-497.
22. McCarthy G., Luby M., Gore J., Goldman-Rakic P. Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI. J. Neurophysiol. 77:1997;1630-1634.
23. McCarthy G., Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 62:1985;203-208.
24. Pfefferbaum A., Ford J.M. ERPs to stimuli requiring response production and inhibition: Effects of age, probability and visual noise. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 71:1988;55-63.
25. Pfefferbaum A., Ford J.M., Roth W.T., Kopell B.S. Age-related changes in auditory event-related potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 49:1980;266-276.
26. Picton T.W. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 9:1992;456-479.
27. Polich J. Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 63:1986;251-259.
28. Polich J. Task difficulty, probability, and inter-stimulus interval as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 68:1987;311-320.
29. Polich J. P300 clinical utility and control of variability. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 15:1998;14-33.
30. Polich J., Heine M.R.D. P300 topography and modality effects from a single stimulus paradigm. Psychophysiology. 33:1996;747-752.
31. Polich J., Squires L.R. P300 from amnesic patients with bilateral hippocampal lesions. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 86:1993;408-417.
32. Polich J., Alexander J.E., Bauer L.O., Kuperman S., Rohrbaugh J., Morzorati S., O'Connor S.J., Porjesz B., Begleiter H. P300 topography of amplitude/latency correlations. Brain Topogr. 9:1997;275-282.
33. Potts G.F., Liotti M., Tucker D.M., Posner M.I. Frontal and inferior temporal cortical activity in visual target detection: Evidence from high spatially sampled event-related potentials. Brain Topogr. 9:1996;3-14.
34. Semlitsch H.V., Anderer P., Schuster P., Presslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology. 23:1986;695-703.
35. Squires N.K., Squires K.C., Hillyard S.A. Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 38:1975;387-401.
36. Verbaten M.N., Huyben M.A., Kemner C. Processing capacity and the frontal P3. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 25:1997;237-248.
37. Verleger R. On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology. 34:1997;131-156.
38. Yamaguchi S., Knight R.T. P300 generation by novel somatosensory stimuli. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 78:1991;50-55.