Gender differences in gifted and average-ability students: Comparing girls' and boys' achievement, self-concept, interest, and motivation in mathematics

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 146-159

  Preckel, Franzis ^a   Goetz, Thomas ^b,e   Pekrun, Reinhard ^c   Kleine, Michael ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^e Thurgau University of Teacher Education   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Academic self concept; Gender differences; Giftedness; Interest; Mathematics; Motivation

Indexed keywords

EID: 42549091725     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0016986208315834     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Achter, J.A., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C.P. (1996). Multipotentiality among intellectually gifted: "It was never there and already its vanishing." Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 65-76.
2. Anderson, E.B. (1973). A goodness of fit test for the Raschmodel. Psychometrika, 38, 123-140.
3. Baumert, J., Bos, W., & Lehmann, R. (Eds.) (2000). TIMSS/III: Dritte Internationale Mathematik- und Naturwissenschaftsstudie- Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Bildung am Ende der Schullaufbahn [TIMSS/III: Third international mathematics and science study-Education in math and science at the end of school training]. Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.
4. Baumert, J., & Kller, O. (1998). Interest research in secondary level I: An overview. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender (pp. 241-256). Kiel, Germany: Institut fr die Pdagogik der Naturwissenschaften an der Universitt Kiel.
5. Benbow, C.P., & Lubinski, D. (1993). Psychological profiles of the mathematically talented: Some gender differences and evidence supporting their biological basis. In K. Ackerill (Ed.), The origins and development of high ability (pp. 44-59) [Ciba Foundation Symposium No. 178]. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
6. Benbow, C.P., & Stanley, J.C. (1983). Academic precocity: Aspects of its development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7. Brody, L.E., Barnett, L.B., & Mills, C.J. (1994). Gender differences among talented adolescents: Research studies by SMPY and CTY at the Johns Hopkins University. In K. A. Heller & E. A. Hany (Eds.), Competence and responsibility: Proceedings of the Third European Conference of the European Council for High Ability (pp. 204-210). Gttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
8. Byrne, B.M., & Gavin, D.A.W. (1996). The Shavelson model revisited: Testing for structure of academic self-concept across pre-, early, and late adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 215-228.
9. Carroll, J.B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Colangelo, N., Assouline, S.G., Cole, V., Cutrona, C., & Maxey, J.E. (1996). Exceptional academic performance: Perfect scores on the PLAN. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 102-110.
11. Dawis, R.V., & Lofquist, L.H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12. Eccles, J.S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
13. Eccles, J.S. (1987). Gender roles and womens achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135-172.
14. Eccles, J.S. (1993). Parents as gender-role socializers during middle childhood and adolescence. New Orleans, LA: Society for Research in Child Development.
15. Eccles, J.S., Adler, T., & Meece, J.L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 26-43.
16. Eccles, J.S., & Harold, R.D. (1992). Gender differences in educational and occupational patterns among the gifted. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Amronson (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings form the 1991 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 3-29). Unionville, NY: Trillium.
17. Eccles, J.S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R.D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in childrens self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830-847.
18. Educational Testing Service. (1987). A summary of data collected from Graduate Record Examinations test-takers during 1985-86. Princeton, NJ: Author.
19. Elliot, A., & Harackiewicz, J. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 968-980.
20. Elliot, A.J., & McGregor, H.A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
21. Embretson, S.E., & Reise, S.P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Enman, M., & Lupart, J. (2000). Talented female students resistance to science: An exploratory study of post-secondary achievement motivation, persistence, and epistemological characteristics. High Ability Studies, 11, 161-178.
23. Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J., & Portocarero, L. (1979). Intergenerational class mobility in three Western European societies: England, France and Sweden. British Journal of Sociology, 30, 415-441.
24. Ewert, O. (1979). Eine deutsche Version der Sears Self-concept Inventory Scale [Sears self-concept inventory scale-German version]. In S. H. Filipp (Ed.), Selbstkonzept-Forschung (pp. 191-202). Stuttgart, Germany: Klett.
25. Finsterwald, M., & Ziegler, A. (2002). Geschlechtsunterschiede in der Motivation: Ist die Situation bei normal begabten und hoch begabten Schler(inne)n gleich? [Gender differences in motivation: Is the situation comparable for gifted and nongifted female students?]. In H. Wagner (Ed.), Hoch begabte Mdchen und Frauen.Begabungsentwicklung und Geschlechtsunterschiede (pp. 67-83). Bad Honnef, Germany: Bock.
26. Fox, L.H., Engle, J.L., & Paek, P. (2001). An exploratory study of social factors and mathematics achievement among high-scoring students: Cross-cultural perspective from TIMSS. Gifted and Talented International, 16, 7-15.
27. Freeman, C.E. (2004). Trends in educational equity of girls & women: 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
28. Freeman, J. (2003). Gender differences in gifted achievement in Britain and the U.S. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 202-211.
29. Freeman, J. (2004). Cultural influences on gifted gender achievement. High Ability Studies, 15, 7-23.
30. Frome, P.M., & Eccles, J.S. (1998). Parents influence on childrens achievement-related perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 435-452.
31. Gallagher, A.M., & Kaufmann, J.C. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Grossman, M., & Wood, W. (1993). Sex differences in intensity of emotional experience: A social role interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1010-1022.
33. Halpern, D.F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Hanna, G. (2000). Declining gender differences from FIMS to TIMSS. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 32, 11-17.
35. Hannover, B. (1998). The development of self-concept and interests. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning. Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender (pp. 105-125). Kiel, Germany: Institut fr die Pdagogik der Naturwissenschaften an der Universitt Kiel.
36. Heller, K.A., & Perleth, C. (2000). Kognitiver Fhigkeitstest fr 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision (KFT 4-12+R) [Cognitive ability test for class level 4 to 12, revised version]. Gttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
37. Heller, K.A., & Ziegler, A. (1996). Gender differences in mathematics and the natural sciences: Can attributional retraining improve the performance of gifted females ? Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 200-210.
38. Hofe, R. vom, Pekrun, R., Kleine, M., & Goetz, T. (2002). Projekt zur Analyse der Leistungsentwicklung in Mathematik (PALMA). Konstruktion des Regensburger Mathematikleistungstests fr 5.-10 Klassen [Project for the analysis of achievement development in mathematics: Construction of a mathematics achievement test for grades 5 to 10]. Zeitschrift fr Pdagogik, 45. Beiheft. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
39. Holland, J.L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
40. Holling, H., & Preckel, F. (2005). Self-estimation of intelligence- Methodological approaches and gender differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 503-517.
41. Hosenfeld, I., Kller, O., & Baumert, J. (1999). Why sex differences in mathematics achievement disappear in German secondary schools: A reanalysis of the German TIMSS-data. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 25, 143-161.
42. Hyde, J.S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S.J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155.
43. Jacobs, J.E., & Eccles, J.S. (1992). The impact of mothers gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers and childrens ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 932-944.
44. Jger, A.O., Holling, H., Preckel, F., Schulze, R., Vock, M., Sß, H.-M., et al. (2006). Berliner Intelligenzstruktur-Test fr Jugendliche: Begabungs- und Hochbegabungsdiagnostik (BIS-HB) [Berlin structure of intelligence test for youth: Assessment of talent and giftedness]. Gttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
45. Kerr, B., & Robinson Kurpius, S.E. (2004). Encouraging talented girls in math and science: Effects of a guidance intervention. High Ability Studies, 15, 85-102.
46. Leahey, E., & Guo, G. (2001). Gender differences in mathematical trajectories. Social Forces, 80, 713-732.
47. Leder, G. (2004). Gender differences among gifted students: Contemporary views. High Ability Studies, 15, 103-108.
48. Le Maistre, C., & Kanevsky, L. (1996). Factors influencing the realization of exceptional mathematical ability in girls: An analysis of the research. High Ability Studies, 8, 31-46.
49. Lohman, D.F. (2005). The role of nonverbal ability tests in identifying academically gifted students: An aptitude perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 111-136.
50. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C.P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: Implications for the math/science pipeline. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 61-66.
51. Lubinski, D., Benbow, C.P., & Morelock, M. (2000). Gender differences in engineering and the physical sciences among the gifted: An inorganic-organic distinction. In K. Heller, F. Mnks, R. Sternberg, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2 nd ed., pp. 633-648). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
52. Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L.G. (1990). A broadly based analysis of mathematical giftedness. Intelligence, 14, 327-355.
53. Lupart, J.L., Cannon, E., & Telfer, J.O. (2004). Gender differences in adolescent academic achievement, interests, values, and life-role expectations. High Ability Studies, 15, 25-42.
54. Marsh, H.W. (1988). Self description questionnaire: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept: A test manual and a research monograph. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
55. Marsh, H.W. (1993). Academic self-concept: Theory measurement and research. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4, pp. 59-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Marsh, H.W., & Yeung, A.S. (1997). Coursework selection: Relations to academic self-concept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 691-720.
57. Nuttal, R.L., Casey, M.B., & Pezaris, E. (2004). Spatial ability as mediator of gender differences on mathematical tests: A biological-environmental framework. In A. Gallager & J. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp.1 21-142). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003). PISA 2003 assessment framework-Mathematics, reading, science, and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris: Author.
59. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2004). Learning for tomorrows world-First results from PISA 2003. Paris: Author.
60. Pajares, F., Britner, S., & Valiante, G. (2000). Writing and science achievement goals of middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 406-422.
61. Pajares, F., & Miller, M.D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193-203.
62. Pekrun, R. (1992). The expectancy-value theory of anxiety: Overview and implications. In D. G. Forgays, T. Sosnowski, & K. Wrzesniewski (Eds.), Anxiety: Recent developments in self-appraisal, psychophysiological and health research (pp. 23-41). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
63. Pekrun, R. (1993). Facets of students academic motivation: A longitudinal expectancy-value approach. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 8, pp. 139-189). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
64. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Frenzel, A.C. (2005). Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Mathematics (AEQ-M)-Users manual. Munich, Germany: University of Munich.
65. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., vom Hofe, R., Blum, W., Jullien, S., Zirngibl, A., et al.. (2004). Emotionen und Leistung im Fach Mathematik: Ziele und erste Befunde aus dem Projekt zur Analyse der Leistungsentwicklung in Mathematik (PALMA) [Emotions and achievement in mathematics: Aims and first results of the Project for the Analysis of Learning and Achievement in Mathematics (PALMA)]. In J. Doll & M. Prenzel (Eds.), Bildungsqualitt von Schule: Lehrerprofessionalisierung, Unterrichtsentwicklung und Schlerfrderung als Strategien der Qualittsverbesserung (pp. 345-363). Mnster, Germany: Waxmann.
66. Pekrun, R., & Zirngibl, A. (2004). Schlermerkmale im Fach Mathematik [Student characteristics in mathematics]. In M. Prenzel, J. Baumert, W. Blum, R. Lehmann, D. Leutner, M. Neubrand, R. Pekrun, H.-G. Rolff, J. Rost, & U. Schiefele (Eds.), PISA 2003. Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland-Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs (pp. 191-210). Mnster, Germany: Waxmann.
67. Preckel, F., & Thiemann, H. (2003). Online- versus paper-pencil-version of a high potential intelligence test. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62, 131-138.
68. Roznowski, M., Reith, J., & Hong, S. (2000). A further look at youth intellectual giftedness and its correlates: Values, interests, performance, and behavior. Intelligence, 28, 87-113.
69. Schober, B., Reimann, R., & Wagner, P. (2004). Is research on gender-specific underachievement in gifted girls an obsolete topic? New findings on an often discussed issue. High Ability Studies, 15, 43-62.
70. Skaalvik, S., & Skaalvik, E.M. (2004). Gender differences in math and verbal self-concept, performance expectations, and motivation. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 50, 241-252.
71. Sternberg, R.J., & Davidson, J. (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2 nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72. Stumpf, H., & Stanley, J.C. (1998). Stability and change in gender-related differences on the college board advanced placement and achievement tests. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 192-196.
73. Terwilliger, J., & Titus, J. (1995). Gender differences in attitudes and attitude changes among mathematically talented youth. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 29-35.
74. Thorndike, R.L., & Hagen, E. (1971). Cognitive abilities test. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
75. Todt, E., & Schreiber, S. (1998). Development of interests. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (1998). Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender (pp. 25-40). Kiel, Germany: Institut fr die Pdagogik der Naturwissenschaften an der Universitt Kiel.
76. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S., Suk Yoon, K., Harold, R.D., Arbreton, A.J.A., Freedman-Doan, C., et al. (1997). Change in childrens competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451-469.
77. Wilgenbusch, T., & Merrill, K.W. (1999). Gender differences in self-concept among children and adolescents: A meta-analysis of multidimensional studies. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 101-120.
78. Ziegler, A. (2004). Gifted females in mathematics, the natural sciences and technology [Special Issue]. High Ability Studies, 15.
79. Ziegler, A., Heller, K.A., & Broome, P. (1996). Motivational preconditions for girls gifted and highly gifted in physics. High Ability Studies, 7, 129-144.
80. Zirngibl, A., Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Perry, R.P. (2005, April). Girls and mathematics-A hopeless issue? An analysis of girls and boys emotional experiences in mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
81. Zorman, R., & David, H. (2000). Female achievement and challenges towards the third millenium. Jerusalem, Israel: Henrietta Szold Institute Press.