Online- versus paper-pencil-version of a high potential intelligence test

Swiss Journal of Psychology

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 131-138

  Preckel, Franzis ^a   Thiemann, Helge ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Figural matrices test; Intellectual giftedness; Online ability testing; Rule based item construction

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038336725     PISSN: 14210185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024//1421-0185.62.2.131     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. American Psychological Association (1999). The standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: APA.
2. Buchanan, T. (2000). Potential of the internet for personality research. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the internet (pp. 121-140). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Buchanan, T., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Using the Internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World Wide Web. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 125-144.
4. Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97, 404-431.
5. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, MA: University Press.
6. Embretson, S. (1995). The role of working memory capacity and general control processes in intelligence. Intelligence, 20, 169-189.
7. Embretson, S. (1998). A cognitive design system approach to generating valid tests: Application to abstract reasoning. Psychological Methods, 3, 380-396.
8. Feldhusen, J. F., & Jarvan, F. A. (2000). Identification of gifted and talented youth for educational programs. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, A. H. Passow, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 233-252). Kidlington, OX: Elsevier Science Ltd.
9. Gittler, G. (1989). Dreidimensionaler Würfeltest. Ein Raschskalierter Test zur Messung des räumlichen Vorstellungsvermögens. Testmanual [Three-dimensional cube test. A Rasch-scaled test for measuring spatial power of imagination. Testmanual]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Test.
10. Hornke, L. F., Küppers, A., & Etzel, S. (2000). Konstruktion und Evaluation eines adaptiven Matrizentests [Construction and evaluation of an adaptive matrices test]. Diagnostica, 46(4), 182-188.
11. Jensen, A. (1998). The g-factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
12. Krantz, J. H., & Dalal, R. (2000). Validity of web-based psychological research. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the internet (pp. 35-60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13. Marshalek, B., Lohman, D. F., & Snow, R. E. (1983). The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence. Intelligence, 7, 107-127.
14. Mead, A. D., & Drasgow, F. (1993). Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 449-458.
15. Mills, C. J., & Tissot, S. L. (1995). Identifying academic potential in students from under-represented populations: Is using the Ravens Progressive Matrices a good idea? Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 209-217.
16. Preckel, F. (2002). Regelgeleitete Entwicklung eines figuralen Matrizentests zur Erfassung intellektueller Hochbegabung. Unveröffentlichte Dissertationsschrift [Rule-based development of a figural matrices test for the assessment of intellectual giftedness. Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany.
17. Preckel, F. (2003). Diagnostik intellektueller Hochbegabung. Testentwicklung zur Erfassung der fluiden Intelligenz [Assessment of intellectual giftedness. Development of a fluid intelligence test]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
18. Primi, R. (2001). Complexity of geometric inductive reasoning tasks. Contribution to the understanding of fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 41-70.
19. Putz-Osterloh, W. (1981). Problemlöseprozesse und Intelligenz-testleistung [Problem-solving processes and intellectual test performance]. Bern: Huber.
20. Raven, J. C. (1962). Advanced Progressive Matrices, Set II. London: H. K. Lewis.
21. Reips, U.-D. (1996). Experimenting in the World-Wide Web. Paper Presented at the 1996 Society for Computers in Psychology Conference, Chicago, IL.
22. Reips, U.-D. (1999). Theorie und Techniken des Web-Experimentierens [Theory and techniques of conducting web experiments]. In B. Batinic, A. Werner, L. Gräf, & W. Bandilla (Eds.), Online Research: Methoden, Anwendungen und Ergebnisse (pp. 277-296). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
23. Robinson, N. M., & Janos, P. M. (1987). The contribution of intelligence tests to the understanding of special children. In J. D. Day & J. B. Borkowski (Eds.), Intelligence and exceptionality: New directions for theory, assessment, and instructional practices (pp. 21-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
24. Rost, D. H. (Hrsg.) (2000). Hochbegabte und hochleistende Jugendliche [Highly gifted and performing youth]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
25. Rost, J. (1996). Lehrbuch Testtheorie, Testkonstruktion [Test-theory, Testconstruction]. Göttingen, Germany: Huber.
26. Sattler, J. ( 1982). Assessment of children's intelligence and special abilities (2nd ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn-Bacon.
27. Snow, R. E., Kyllonen, P. C., & Marshalek, B. (1984). The topography of ability and learning correlations. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 47-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Spitz, H. (1982). Intellectual extremes, mental age, and the nature of human intelligence. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 28, 167-192.
29. van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Harsveld, M. (1994). The incomplete equivalence of the paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of the general aptitude test battery. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 852-859.
30. Vodegel Matzen, L. B. L., van der Molen, M. W., & Dudnik, C. M. (1994). Error analysis of Raven test performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 433-445.
31. Weiß, R. H. (1998). Grundintelligenztest Skala 2 [Basic intelligence scale 2] (CFT 20, 4th ed.). Göttingen: Testzentrale.
32. Wilhelm, O., & McKnight, P. E. (2002). Ability and achievement testing on the world wide web. In B. Batinic, U.-D. Reips, & U. Bosnjak (Eds.), Online Social Sciences (pp. 151-181), Toronto: Hogrefe.