Spatial ability as a mediator of gender differences on mathematics tests: A biological-environmental framework

Gender Differences in Mathematics: An Integrative Psychological Approach

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 121-142

  Nuttall, Ronald L ^a   Beth Casey, M ^a   Pezaris, Elizabeth ^b  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923603832     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511614446.007     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. American Association of University Women. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: A study of major findings on girls in education. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Anderson, K., Casey, B., & Kerrigan, M. (2002). Froglets do the measuring. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill.
3. Annett, M. (1985). Left, right, hand, and brain: The right shift theory. London: Erlbaum.
4. Annett, M. (1995a). The right shift theory of a genetic balanced polymorphism for cerebral dominance and cognitive processing. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 14, 427-480.
5. Annett, M. (1995b). The fertility of the right shift theory. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 14, 623-650.
6. Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327-344.
7. Bassi, J. (2000). Block play: Exposing gender differences and predicting for math achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University, Boston.
8. Battista, M. T. (1990). Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 47-60.
9. Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I.V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L.,&Smith, T. A. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center, Boston College.
10. Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1990). Differential aptitude tests (5th ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
11. Bishop, D. V. M. (1990). Handedness and developmental disorder. Philadelphia: MacKeith Press.
12. Brosnan, M. J. (1998). Spatial ability in children's play with lego blocks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 19-28.
13. Burnett, S. A. (1986). Sex-related differences in spatial ability: Are they trivial? American Psychologist, 41, 1012-1014.
14. Burnett, S. A., & Lane, D. M. (1971). Effects of academic instruction on spatial visualization. Intelligence, 4, 233-242.
15. Burnett, S. A., Lane, D. L., & Dratt, L. M. (1979). Spatial visualization and sex differences in quantitative ability. Intelligence, 3, 345-354.
16. Burton, L. (Ed.). (1986). Girls into maths can go. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
17. Caldera, Y. M., Culp, A. M., O'Brien, M., Truglio, R. T., Alvarez, M.,&Huston, A. C. (1999). Children's play preferences, construction play with blocks, and visualspatial skills: Are they related? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23, 855-872.
18. Caplan, P. J., MacPherson, G. M., & Tobin, P. (1985). Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist? A multilevel critique with new data. American Psychologist, 40, 786-799.
19. Casey, B. (2003). Mathematics problem-solving adventures: A language-arts based supplementary series for early childhood that focuses on spatial sense. In D. Clements, J. Sarama, & M. A. DiBaise (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Results of the conference on standards for pre-school and kindergarten mathematics education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
20. Casey, B., Anderson, K., & Schiro, M. (2002). Layla finds secret patterns. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill.
21. Casey, B., Goodrow, A., Schiro, M., & Anderson, K. (2002). Teeny goes to Shapeland. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill.
22. Casey, B., Napoleon, I., Schiro, M., & Anderson, K. (2002). Seeking Mathapotamus. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill.
23. Casey, B., Paugh, P., & Ballard, N. (2002). Sneeze the Dragon builds a castle. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill.
24. Casey, M. B. (1996). Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: A nature/nurture interactionist framework. Developmental Review, 16, 241-260.
25. Casey, M. B. (2002). Developmental perspectives on gender. In S. G. Kornstein & A. H. Clayton (Eds.), Women's mental health. New York: Guilford Press.
26. Casey, M. B.,&Brabeck, M. M. (1989). Exceptions to the male advantage on a spatial task: Family handedness and college major as a factor identifying women who excel. Neuropsychologia, 27, 689-696.
27. Casey, M. B.,&Brabeck, M. M. (1990).Women who excel on a spatial task: Proposed genetic and environmental factors. Brain and Cognition, 12, 73-84.
28. Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R., Pezaris, E.,&Benbow, C. P. (1995). The influence of spatial ability on gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology, 31, 697-705.
29. Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (1997). Mediators of gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores: A comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties. Developmental Psychology, 33, 669-680.
30. Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L.,&Pezaris, E. (1999). Evidence in support of a model that predicts how biological and environmental factors interact to influence spatial skills. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1237-1247.
31. Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (2001). Spatial-mechanical reasoning skills versus mathematics self-confidence as mediators of gender differences on mathematics subtests using cross-national gender-based items. Journal for Reseach in Mathematics Education, 32, 28-57.
32. Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420- 464). New York: Macmillan.
33. Connor, J. M., & Serbin, L. A. (1977). Behaviorally based masculine- and feminineactivity- preference scales for preschoolers: Correlations with other classroom behaviors and cognitive tests. Child Development, 48, 1411-1416.
34. Erikson, E. H. (1951). Sex differences in the play configurations of preadolescents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 21, 667-692.
35. Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95-103.
36. Fuys, D. J., & Liebow, A. K. (1993). Geometry and spatial sense. In R. J. Jensen & S. Wagner (Eds.), Research ideas for the classroom: Early childhood mathematics (pp. 45-62). New York: Macmillan.
37. Gallagher, A. M., DeLisi, R., Holst, P. C., McGillicuddy-DeLisi, Morely, M., & Cahalan, C. (2000). Gender differences in advanced mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78, 165-190.
38. Geary, D. C., Saults, S. J., Liu, F., & Hoard, M. K. (2000). Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 337-353.
39. Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1987). Cerebral lateralization. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
40. Govier, E., & Feldman, J. (1999). Occupational choice and patterns of cognitive abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 99-108.
41. Halpern, D. F. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43. Hamilton, L. S., Nussbaum, E. M., Kupermintz, H., Kerkoven, J. I. M.,&Snow, R. E. (1995). Enhancing the validity and usefulness of large-scale educational assessments: II. NELS:88 science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 555-581.
44. Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41-45.
45. Hershkowitz, R., Parzysz, B., & Van Dormolen, J. (1996). In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Labore (Eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
46. Humphreys, L. G., Lubinski, D., & Yao, G. (1993). Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 250-261.
47. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155.
48. Kalichman, S. C. (1988). Individual differences in water-level task performance: A component-skills analysis. Developmental Review, 88, 273-295.
49. Kimball, M. M. (1989). A new perspective on women's math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 198-214.
50. Li, C., Nuttall, R. L., & Zhao, S. (1999). The effect of writing Chinese characters on success on the water-level task. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 91-105.
51. Liben, L. S., & Golbeck, S. L. (1984). Performance on Piagetian horizontality and verticality tasks: Sex-related difference in knowledge of relevant physical phenomena. Developmental Psychology, 20, 595-606.
52. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.
53. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1986). A meta-analysis of gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for mathematics and science achievement. In J. S. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 67-101). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
54. Lynn, R. (1992). Sex differences on the Differential Aptitude Test in British and American adolescents. Educational Psychology, 12, 101-106.
55. Marshall, S. P., & Smith, J. D. (1987). Sex differences in learning mathematics: A longitudinal study with item and error analyses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 372-383.
56. Masters, M. S., & Sanders, B. (1993). Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? Behavior Genetics, 23, 337-341.
57. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
58. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
59. Parsons, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. R., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1980). Self-perceptions, task perceptions, and academic choice: origins and change.Washington, DC: Final Report to the National Institute of Education.
60. Pezaris, E., Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., Bassi, J. C., Trzynski, M., Averna, S., & Galluccio, L. (1998). Style of block building in boys and girls and its relationship to their spatial and mathematical skills. Paper presented at the twenty-first annual mid-year meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Budapest, Hungary.
61. Quaiser-Pohl, C.,&Lehmann, W. (2002). Girls' spatial abilities: Charting the contributions of experiences and attitudes in different academic groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 245-260.
62. Robinson, N. M., Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V.W., & Busse, J. (1996). The structure of abilities in math-precocious young children: Gender similarities and differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 341-352.
63. Robinson, N. M., Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., Busse, J., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (1997). Developmental changes in mathematically precocious young children: Longitudinal and gender effects. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 145-159.
64. Schiro, M., Casey, B., & Anderson, K. (2002). Tan and the Shape Changer. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill.
65. Secada, W. G., Fennema, E., & Adajian, L. B. (Eds.). (1995). New directions for equity in mathematics education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
66. Sherman, J. A. (1978). Sex-related cognitive differences. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
67. Sholl, M. J. (1989). The relation between horizontality and rod-and-frame and vestibular navigational performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 110-125.
68. Springer, S. P.,&Deutsch, G. (1989). Left brain, right brain.NewYork:W. H. Freeman.
69. Stigler, J.W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.
70. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 599-604.
71. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250-270.
72. Wachs, T. D. (1992). The nature of nurture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
73. Wheatley, G. H. (1990). Spatial sense and mathematics learning. Arithmetic Teacher, 37, 10-11.
74. Wigfield, A., & Meece, J. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 210-216.
75. Willingham, W. W., & Cole, N. S. (1997). Gender and fair assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
76. Wittig, M. A., & Allen, M. J. (1984). Measurement of adult performance on Piaget's water horizontality task. Intelligence, 8, 305-313.
77. Wolfgang, C. H., Stannard, L. L., & Jones, I. (2001). Block performance among preschoolers as a predictor of later school achievement in mathematics. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 15, 173-181.