Gender Differences in Mathematics and the Sciences: Can Attributional Retraining Improve the Performance of Gifted Females?

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 200-210

  Heller, Kurt A ^a   Ziegler, Albert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001482380     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001698629604000405     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 47-74.
2. Alt, C., Wolf, B. & Arndt, H. (1988). Thesen zur Erschliessung gewerblich-technischer Ausbildungsberufe für Mädchen [Theses on opening up vocations in industry and commerce for girls]. Berichte zur beruflichen Bildung. Berlin: Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung.
3. Andrews, R. G., Debus, R. L. (1978). Persistence and the causal perception of failure: Modifying cognitive attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 154-166.
4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
5. Bandura, A. (1981). In search of pure unidirectional determinants. Behavior Therapy, 12, 30-40.
6. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
7. Beerman, L., Heller, K.A. & Menacher, P. (1992). Mathe: nichts für Mädchen? Begabung und Geschlecht am Beispielvon Mathematik, Naturwissenschaft und Technik [Maths: Nothing for girls? Ability and gender in mathematics, natural sciences and technology]. Bern: Huber.
8. Benbow, C.P. (1986). Physiological correlates of extreme intellectual precocitiy. Neuropsychologia, 24, 719-725.
9. Benbow, C.P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability among the intellectually talented: Their characterization, consequences, and possible explanations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 169-232.
10. Benbow, C.P. & Arjmand, O. (1990). Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematics and science by mathematically talented students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 430-441.
11. Benbow, C.P. & Lubinski, D. (1993). Psychological profiles of the mathematically talented: Some sex differences and evidence supporting their biological basis. In G.R. Bock & K. Ackrill (Eds.), The origins and development of high ability (pp. 44-66). Chichester: Wiley.
12. Benbow, C.P. & Minor, L.L. (1986). Mathematically talented males and females and achievement in the high school sciences. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 425-436.
13. Benbow, C.P., & Stanley, J.C. (1982). Consequences in high school and college of sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: A longitudinal perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 598-622.
14. Birx, E. (1988). Mathematik und Begabung. Evaluation eines Förderprogramms für mathematisch besonders befähigte Schüler [Gender and mathematics. Evaluation of a gifted program for mathematically talented students].Hamburg: Krämer.
15. Block, J., & Lanning, K. (1984). Attribution therapy requestioned: A secondary analysis of the Wilson-Linville study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 705-708.
16. Bock, G.R. & Ackrill, K. (Eds.). (1993). The origins and development of high ability. Chichester: Wiley.
17. Brooks-Gunn, J. & Mathews, W.S. (1979). He and she: How children develop their sex-role identity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
18. Bryck, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
19. Callahan, C.M. (1991). An update on gifted females. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 284-311.
20. Cascio, W.F. (1982). Applied psychology in personnel management. Reston: Reston.
21. Chipman, S.F. & Thomas, V.G. (1987): The participation of women and minorities in mathematical, scientific, and technical fields. In E.Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 14 (pp. 387-429). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
22. Cooper, H.M., Burger, J.M. & Good, T.L. (1981). Gender differences in the academic locus of control beliefs of young children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 562-572.
23. Cordua, G.D., McGraw, K.O. & Drabman, R.S. (1979). Doctor or nurse: Children's perception of sex typed occupations. Child Development, 50, 590-593.
24. Craven, R. G., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (1991). Effects of internally focused feedback on enhancement of academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 17-27.
25. Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 457-464.
26. Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1980). An analysis of learned helplessness: II. The processing of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 940-952.
27. Dweck, C. S. (1975). The rules of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 674-685.
28. Dweck, C. S., Davidson, W., Nelson, S. & Enna, B. (1978). Sex differences in learned helplessness. Developmental Psychology, 14, 268-276.
29. Dweck, C. S., & Repucci, N. D. (1973). Learned helplessness and intellectual achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 109-116.
30. Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S.B., Kaczala, C.M., Meece, J. & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 26-43). San Francisco: Freeman.
31. Försterling, F. (1985). Attributional retraining: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 495-512.
32. Försterling, F. (1987). Sozialpsychologische Begründung von Therapieverfahren: Eine attributionstheoretische Perspektive [Arguments from social psychology for therapy methods: An attribution-theoretical perspective]. In J. Schultz-Gambard (Ed.), Angewandte Sozialpsychologie (pp. 321-328). München: Psychologie-Verlags-Union.
33. Försterling, F. (1994). Attributionstheorie in der Klinischen Psychologie: Gemeinsamkeiten mit Kognitiven und Verhaltens-Therapien [Attribution theory in clinical psychology: Common features with cognitive and behavioral therapy]. In F. Försterling & J. Stiensmeier-Pelster (Eds.), Attributionstheorie (pp. 235-254). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
34. Fox, L. H. (1976). Women and the career relevance of mathematics and science. School Science in Mathematics, 26, 347-353.
35. Frieze, I. H., & Weiner, B. (1971). Cue utilization and attributional judgments for success and failure. Journal of Personality, 39, 591-605.
36. Gatting-Stiller, I., Gerling, M., Stiller, K., Voß, B., & Wender, I. (1979). Änderung der Kausalattribuierung und des Ausdauerverhaltens bei mißerfolgsmotivierten Kindern durch Modellernen [Changing causal attribution and persistence of failure motivated children by model learning]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 11, 300-312.
37. Graham, S. (1984). Communicating sympathy and anger to black and white children: The cognitive (attributional) consequences of affective cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 40-54.
38. Hannover, B. (1991). Zur Unterrepräsentanz von Mädchen in Naturwissenschaften und Technik: Psychologische Prädiktoren der Fach-und Berufswahl [On the underrepresentation of girls in natural sciences and technology: Psychological predictors for the choice of subject and vocation]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 5, 169-186.
39. Hannover, B. & Bettge, S. (1992). Mädchen und Technik. Ein Interventionsprojekt zur Förderung naturwissenschaftlich-technischer Interessen von Mädchen [Girls and Technology: An intervening project for nurturing interests of girls in natural sciences and technology]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
40. Head, J. (1981). Personality and the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 339-350.
41. Heckhausen, H. (1989). Motivation und Handeln. Heidelberg: Springer.
42. Heller, K.A. (1992a). Aims and methodological problems of an intervention study in gifted and talented girls. In F.J. Mönks & W.A.M. Peters (Eds.), Talent for the future (pp. 149-154). Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum.
43. Heller, K.A. (Ed.). (1992b). Hochbegabung im Kindes-und Jugendalter [High Ability in Children and Adolescents]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
44. Helmke, A., Schrader, F. W. & Lehneis-Klepper, G. (1991). Zur Rolle des Elternverhaltens für die Schulleistungsentwicklung ihrer Kinder [The influence of parental behavior on the development of school performance]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 1-22.
45. Hoffmann, L. (1988a). Mädchen/Frauen und Naturwissenschaften/ Technik [Girls/women and natural sciences/technology]. In S.I. Giesche & D. Sachse (Eds.), Frauen verändern Lernen. Kiel: Hypatra.
46. Hoffmann, L. (1988b). Möglichkeiten zur Förderung des Interesses von Schülerinnen an naturwissenschaftlicher Bildung im Sekundarbereich I am Beispiel Physik [Possibilities for enhancing female student's interests in natural sciences in junior high school at the example of physics]. In D. Janshen & H. Rudolph (Eds.), Frauen gestalten Technik: Ingenieurinnen im internationalen Vergleich. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus.
47. Hoffmann, L. & Lehrke, L. (1986). Eine Untersuchung über Schülerinteressen an Physik und Technik [A study on student interests in physics and technology]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 32, 189-204.
48. Hyde, J.S. (1981). How large are gender differences? American Psychologist, 36, 892-901.
49. Jäger, R., Berbig, E., Geisel, B., Gosslar, H., Hagen, J., Liebich, W. & Schafheutle, R. (1973). Mannheimer Biographisches Inventar (MBI) [Mannheim Biographical Inventory (MBI)].Göttingen: Hogrefe.
50. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on motivation (pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
51. Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-developmental analysis of childrens' sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E.E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 80-173). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
52. Lantz, A.E. & Smith, G.P. (1981). Factors influencing the choice of nonrequired mathematics courses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 825-837.
53. Liben, L.S. & Golbeck, S.L. (1984). Performance and Piagetian horizontality and verticality tasks: Sex-related differences in knowledge of relevant physical phenomena. Developmental Psychology, 30, 595-606.
54. Linn, M.C. & Petersen, A.C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex diffferences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.
55. Lubinski, D., Benbow, C.P. & Sanders, C.R. (1993). Reconceptualizing gender differences in achievement among the gifted. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Mönks & A.H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 693-707). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
56. Maccoby, E.E. & Jacklin, C.N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
57. Malcolm, S. (1988). Brilliant women for science, mathematics, and engineering: Getting more than we deserve? Paper presented at the Huricon Association for the Advancement of Science at Duke University, Durham, NC.
58. Marsh, H.W., Barnes, J., Cairns, L. & Tidman, M. (1984). Self-description questionnaire: Age and sex effects in the structure and level of self-concept for preadolescent children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 940-956.
59. Marsh, H.W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). The application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor structures and their invariance across age groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562-582.
60. Meehan, A.M. (1984). A meta-analysis of sex differences in formal operational thought. Child Development, 55, 1110-1124.
61. Metz-Göckel, S. (1987). Licht und Schatten der Koedukation [Light and shade of coeducation]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 33, 455-474.
62. Metz-Göckel, S. (1988). Die soziale Distanz von Frauen zur Naturwissenschaft und Technik [The social distance of women towards natural sciences and technology]. In C. Roloff, S. Metz-Göckel, C. Koch & E. Holzrichter (Eds.), Nicht nur ein gutes Examen, 11 (pp. 33-48). Dortmund: Universität Dortmund.
63. Meyer, W. U. (1973). Leistungsmotiv und Ursachenerklärung von Erfolg und Miβerfolg [Achievement motive and causal attribution of success and failure]. Stuttgart: Klett.
64. Miller, R. L., Brickman, P., & Bolen, D. (1975). Attribution versus persuasion as a means for modifying behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 430-441.
65. Nicholls, J. G. (1975). Causal attributions and other achievement-related cognitions: Effects of task outcome, attainment value, and sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 379-389.
66. Nicholls, J. G. (1978). The development of the concepts of effort and ability, perceptions of academic attainment, and the understanding that difficult tasks require more ability. Child Development, 49, 800-814.
67. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.
68. Nicholls, J. G. (1990). What is ability and why are we mindful of it? A developmental perspective. In R.J. Sternberg & J. Kolligian (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 134-148). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
69. Nicholls, J. G. & Miller, A. T. (1984). Development and its discontents: The differentiation of the concept of ability. In J.G. Nicholls (Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol. 3 (pp. 213-227). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
70. Nicholls, J.G., Patashnik, M. & Mettetal, G. (1986). Conceptions of ability and intelligence. Child Development, 57, 636-645.
71. Noel, J. G., Forsyth, D. R., & Kelley, K. N. (1987). Improving the performance of failing students by overcoming their self-serving attributional biases. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 8, 151-162.
72. Parsons, J. E., Adler, T. F. & Kaczala, C. M. (1982). Socialisation of achievement attitudes and beliefs: Parental influences. Child Development, 53, 310-321.
73. Perleth, Ch., & Heller, K.A. (1994). The Munich Longitudinal Study of Giftedness. In R.F. Subotnik & K.D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 77-114). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
74. Rholes, W. S., Blackwell, J., Jordan, C., & Walters, C. (1980). A developmental study of learned helplessness. Developmental Psychology, 16, 616-624.
75. Rimele-Petzold, U. (1986). Mädchen und Berufswahl: Technik alleine macht es nicht! [Girls and vocational choice: Technology alone is not enough!]. Bad Honnef: Bock.
76. Ryckman, D.B. & Peckham, P. (1987). Gender differences in attributions for success and failure situations across subject areas. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 120-125.
77. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379-399.
78. Sherman, J. (1979). Predicting mathematics performance in high school girls and boys. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 242-249.
79. Stanley, J.C. (1993). Boys and girls who reason well mathematically. In G.R. Bock & K. Ackrill (Eds.), The origins and development of high ability (pp. 119-138). Chichester: Wiley.
80. Stumpf, H. (1994). Subskills of spatial ability and their relationships to success in accelerated mathematics courses. In K.A. Heller & E.A. Hany (Eds.), Competence and responsibility, Vol. 2 (pp. 286-297). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber Publ.
81. Stumpf, H. & Klieme, E. (1989). Sex-related differences in spatial ability: More evidence for convergence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 915-921.
82. Supersaxo, A., Perrez, M., & Kramis J. (1986). Beeinflussung der kausalen Attributionstendenzen von Schülern durch Lehrerattribution [Influencing students' tendencies of causal attribution by teacher attribution]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 33, 108-116.
83. Upmeyer, A. & Hannover, B. (1988). Mehr Mädchen in Naturwissenschaften und Technik. Erster Zwischenbericht an das Bundesministerium für Bildung und Wissenschaft (BMBW) Bonn [More girls in natural sciences and technology. First intermediate report to the Federal Ministry for Education and Science (BMBW Bonn)]. Bonn: BMBW.
84. Weary, G., Stanley, M. A., & Harvey, J. H. (1989). Attribution. New York: Springer.
85. Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: Sage.
86. Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3-25.
87. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
88. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.
89. Weiner, B., Frieze, I. H., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S., & Rosenbaum, R. M. (1971). Perceiving the causes of success and failure. New York: General Learning Press.
90. Weiner, B., Kun, A. & Benesh-Weiner, R. (1980). The development of mastery, emotions, and morality from an attributional perspective. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Development of cognition, affect, and social relations (pp. 35-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
91. Wieczerkowski, W. & Jansen, J. (1990). Mädchen und Mathematik: Geschlechtsunterschiede in Leistung und Wahlverhalten [Girls and mathematics: Gender differences in performance and choice behavior]. In W. Wieczerkowski, & T.M. Prado (Eds.), Hochbegabte Mädchen (pp. 134-151). Bad honnef: Bock.
92. Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49-78.
93. Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.
94. Wilson, T. D. & Linville, P. W. (1982). Improving the academic performance of college freshmen: Attribution therapy revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 367-376.
95. Wilson, T. D. & Linville, P. W. (1985). Improving the performance of college freshmen with attributional techniques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 287-293.
96. Yee, D.K. & Eccles, J.S. (1988). Parent perceptions and attributions for children's math achievement. Sex Roles, 19, 317-333.
97. Ziegler, A. & Pöppel. J. (1995). Reattributionstraining mit Statistikstudentinnen [Attributional retraining with female students in statistics]. In R. Arbinger & R.S. Jäger (Eds.), Zukunftsperspektiven empirisch-pädagogischer Forschung (pp. 280-291). Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.
98. Ziegler, A. & Schober, B. (1996). Resultate eines Reattributionstrainings mit Mathematikschülerinnen der 5. Klasse [Results of an attributional retraining with female mathematics students in grade 5]. In E. Witruk & G. Friedrich (Eds.), Pädagogische Psychologie im Streit um ein neues Selbstverständnis (pp. 112-120). Landau: Empirische Pädagogik.
99. Zoeller, C., Mahoney, G. & Weiner B. (1983). Effects of attribution training on the assembly task performance of mentally retarded adults. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 109-112.