Intake of umami-tasting solutions by mice: A genetic analysis

Journal of Nutrition

Volumn 130, Issue 4 SUPPL., 2000, Pages

  Bachmanov, Alexander A ^a   Tordoff, Michael G ^a   Beauchamp, Gary K ^a  

^a MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

C57BL 6 and 129 mouse strains; Consumption; Inosine 5' monophosphate; Monosodium glutamate; Taste

Indexed keywords

GLUTAMATE SODIUM; INOSINE PHOSPHATE; SACCHARIN; SWEETENING AGENT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; BEHAVIOR GENETICS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUID INTAKE; FOOD PREFERENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; RECESSIVE INHERITANCE; SWEETNESS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0034065935     PISSN: 00223166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jn/130.4.935s     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bachmanov, A. A., Schlager, G., Tordoff, M. G. & Beauchamp, G. K. (1998a) Consumption of electrolytes and quinine by mouse strains with different blood pressures. Physiol. Behav. 64: 323-330.
2. Bachmanov, A. A., Tordoff, M. G. & Beauchamp, G. K. (1996) Ethanol consumption and taste preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129/J mice. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 20: 201-206.
3. Bachmanov, A. A., Tordoff, M. G. & Beauchamp, G. K. (1998b) Voluntary sodium chloride consumption by mice: differences among five inbred strains. Behav. Genet. 28: 117-124.
4. Beauchamp, G. K., Bachmanov, A. A. & Stein, L. (1998) Development and genetics of glutamate taste preference. In: Olfaction and Taste XII, An International Symposium (Murphy, C., ed.), vol. 855, pp. 412-416. New York Academy of Sciences, New York, NY.
5. Beauchamp, G. K. & Fisher, A. S. (1993) Strain differences in consumption of saline solutions by mice. Physiol. Behav. 54: 179-184.
6. Collins, F. S. (1992) Positional cloning: let's not call it reverse anymore. Nat. Genet. 1: 3-6.
7. Dove, W. F., ed. (1948) Flavor and Acceptability of Monosodium Glutamate: Proceedings of the Symposium, Quartermaster Food and Container Institute for the Armed Forces, and Associates. Food and Container Institute, Chicago, IL.
8. Gannon, K. & Contreras, R. J. (1993) Sodium intake linked to amiloride-sensitive gustatory transduction in C57BL/6J and 129/J mice. Physiol. Behav. 57: 231-239.
9. Halpern, B. P. (1997) Psychophysics of taste. In: Tasting and Smelling (Beauchamp, G. K. & Bartoshuk, L., eds.), pp. 77-123. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
10. Jungas, R. L., Halperin, M. L. & Brosnan, J. T. (1992) Quantitative analysis of amino acid oxidation and related gluconeogenesis in humans. Physiol. Rev. 72: 419-448.
11. Kawamura, Y. & Kare, M. R., eds. (1987) Umami: A Basic Taste. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
12. Lush, I. E. (1991) The genetics of bitterness, sweetness, and saltiness in strains of mice. In: Genetics of Perception and Communication (Wysocki, C. J. & Kare, M. R., eds.), pp. 227-241. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
13. Ninomiya, Y. & Funakoshi, M. (1989a) Behavioural discrimination between glutamate and the four basic taste substances in mice. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 92: 365-370.
14. Ninomiya, Y. & Funakoshi, M. (1989b) Peripheral neural basis for behavioural discrimination between glutamate and the four basic taste substances in mice. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 92: 371-376.
15. Ninomiya, Y., Nakashima, K., Fukuda, A., Nishino, H., Sugimura, T., Hino, A., Danilova, V. & Hellekant, G. (2000) Responses to umami substances in taste bud cells innervated by the chorda tympani and glossopharyngeal nerves. J. Nutr. 130: 950S-953S.
16. Yamaguchi, S. (1991) Basic properties of umami and effects on humans. Physiol. Behav. 49: 833-841.
17. Yamaguchi, S. (1998) Basic properties of umami and its effects on food flavor. Food Rev. Int. 14: 139-176.
18. Yamamoto, T., Matsuo, R., Fujimoto, Y., Fukanaga, I., Miyasaka, A. & Imoto, T. (1991) Electrophysiological and behavioral studies on the taste of umami substances in the rat. Physiol. Behav. 49: 919-925.
19. Yamamoto, T., Matsuo, R., Kiyomitsu, Y. & Kitamura, R. (1988) Taste effects of umami substances in hamsters as studied by electrophysiological and conditioned taste aversion techniques. Brain Res. 451: 147-162.