Consistent left-right reversals for visual path integration in virtual reality: More than a failure to update one's heading?

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 143-175

  Riecke, Bernhard E ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41549113902     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: 15313263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/pres.17.2.143     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (67)

1. Arthur, K. W. (2000). Effects of field of view on performance with head-mounted displays. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Available at ftp://ftp.cs.unc.edu/pub/publications/techreports/00-019.pdf. Accessed November, 2007.
2. Avraamides, M. N., Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., & Golledge, R. G. (2004). Use of cognitive versus perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on the response mode. Psychological Science, 15(6), 403-408.
3. Bakker, N. H., Werkhoven, P. J., & Passenier, P. O. (1999). The effects of proprioceptive and visual feedback on geographical orientation in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(1), 36-53.
4. Bakker, N. H., Werkhoven, P. J., & Passenier, P. O. (2001). Calibrating visual path integration in VEs. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(2), 216-224.
5. Batschelet, E. (1981). Circular statistics in biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. Chance, S. S., Gaunet, F., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (1998). Locomotion mode affects the updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(2), 168-178.
7. Coluccia, E., & Louse, G. (2004). Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(3), 329-340.
8. Darken, R. P., & Peterson, B. (2002). Spatial orientation, wayfinding and representation. In K. M. Stanney (Ed.), Handbook of virtual environments (pp. 493-518). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Darken, R. P., & Sibert, J. L. (1996). Navigating large virtual spaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 8(1), 49-71.
10. Farrell, M. J., & Robertson, I. H. (1998). Mental rotation and the automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 24(1), 227-233.
11. Gramann, K., Muller, H. J., Eick, E. M., & Schonebeck, B. (2005). Evidence of separable spatial representations in a virtual navigation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1199-1223.
12. Grant, S. C., & Magee, L. E. (1998). Contributions of proprioception to navigation in virtual environments. Human Factors, 40(3), 489-497.
13. IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2004). Presence in depth. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
14. Kearns, M. J., Warren, W. H., Duchon, A. P., & Tarr, M. J.
15. (2002). Path integration from optic flow and body senses in a homing task. Perception, 31(3), 349-374.
16. Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., & Golledge, R. G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science, 9(4), 293-298.
17. Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., & Golledge, R. G. (1997). Encoding spatial representations through nonvisually guided locomotion: Test of human path integration. In D. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 37 (pp. 41-84). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18. Lappe, M., Bremmer, F., & van den Berg, A. V. (1999). Perception of self-motion from visual flow. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(9), 329-336.
19. Lawson, B. D., Graeber, D. A., Mead, A. M., & Muth, E. R. (2002). Signs and symptoms of human syndromes associated with synthetic experiences. In K. M. Stanney (Ed.), Handbook of virtual environments (pp. 589-618). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Lawton, C. A., & Morrin, K. A. (1999). Gender differences in pointing accuracy in computer-simulated 3D mazes. Sex roles, 40(1-2), 73-92.
21. Loomis, J. M., Da Silva, J. A., Philbeck, J. W., & Fukusima, S. S. (1996). Visual perception of location and distance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(3), 72-77.
22. Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Golledge, R. G., & Philbeck, J. W. (1999). Human navigation by path integration. In R. G. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 125-151). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
23. Marlinsky, V. V. (1999). Vestibular and vestibulo-proprioceptive perception of motion in the horizontal plane in blindfolded man - III. Route inference. Neuroscience, 90(2), 403-411.
24. May, M. (1996). Cognitive and embodied modes of spatial imagery. Psychologische Beitrage, 38(3-4), 418-434.
25. May, M. (2004). Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: Transformation versus interference accounts. Cognitive Psychology, 48(2), 163-206.
26. May, M., & Klatzky, R. L. (2000). Path integration while ignoring irrelevant movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26(1), 169-186.
27. Muehl, K. A., & Sholl, M. J. (2004). The acquisition of vector knowledge and its relation to self-rated direction sense. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30(1), 129-141.
28. Péruch, P., & Gaunet, F. (1998). Virtual environments as a promising tool for investigating human spatial cognition. Current Psychology of Cognition, 77(4-5), 881-899.
29. Péruch, P., May, M., & Wartenberg, F. (1997). Homing in virtual environments: Effects of field of view and path layout. Perception, 26(3), 301-311.
30. Peterson, B., Wells, M., Furness, T., III, & Hunt, E. (1998). The effects of the interface on navigation in virtual environments. Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 1998 Annual Meeting.
31. Presson, C. C., & Montello, D. R. (1994). Updating after rotational and translational body movements: Coordinate structure of perspective space. Perception, 23(12), 1447-1455.
32. Prothero, J. D. (1998). The role of rest frames in vection, presence and motion sickness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle. Available at www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/r-98-11/. Accessed November 2007.
33. Razzaque, S. (2005). Redirected walking. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
34. Razzaque, S., Kohn, Z., & Whitton, M. C. (2001). Redirected walking. Proceedings of Eurographics 2001, 289-294.
35. Riecke, B. E. (2006). Simple user-generated motion cueing can enhance self-motion perception (vection) in virtual reality. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST), 104-107.
36. Riecke, B. E., Cunningham, D. W., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2007). Spatial updating in virtual reality: The sufficiency of visual information. Psychological Research, 71(3), 298-313.
37. Riecke, B. E., & McNamara, T. P. (2007). An integrative theory of spatial orientation in the immediate environment. Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci).
38. Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005). Perceiving simulated ego-motions in virtual reality-Comparing large screen displays with HMDs. Proceedings of the SPIE, 5666, 344-355.
39. Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., & Caniard, F. (2006). Visually induced linear vection is enhanced by small physical accelerations. Proceedings of the 7th International Multisensory Research Forum (IMRF). Available at www.kyb.mpg.de/publication.html?publ=3901.
40. Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Caniard, F., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005). Towards lean and elegant self-motion simulation in virtual reality. Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality 2005, 131-138.
41. Riecke, B. E., van Veen, H. A. H. C., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2002). Visual homing is possible without landmarks: A path integration study in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 77(5), 443-473.
42. Riecke, B. E., & von der Heyde, M. (2002). Qualitative modeling of spatial orientation processes using logical propositions: Interconnecting spatial presence, spatial updating, piloting, and spatial cognition (Tech. Rep. No. 100). Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany. Available at www.kyb.mpg.de/publication.html?publ=2021.
43. Riecke, B. E., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005). Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflexlike spatial updating. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 2(3), 183-215.
44. Riecke, B. E., & Wiener, J. M. (2007). Can people not tell left from right in VR? Point-to-origin studies revealed qualitative errors in visual path integration. Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality 2007, 3-10.
45. Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points ofobservation. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15(6), 1157-1165.
46. Ruddle, R. A., & Jones, D. M. (2001). Movement in cluttered virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 70(5), 511-524.
47. Ruddle, R. A., & Lessels, S. (2006). For efficient navigational search, humans require full physical movement, but not a rich visual scene. Psychological Science, 17(6), 460-465.
48. Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J., & Jones, D. M. (1998). Navigating large-scale "desk-top" virtual buildings: Effects of orientation aids and familiarity. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(2), 179-192.
49. Sadalla, E. K., & Montello, D. R. (1989). Remembering changes in direction. Environmental Behavior, 21(3), 346-363.
50. Sadowski, W., & Stanney, K. (2002). Presence in virtual environments. In K. M. Stanney (Ed.), Handbook of virtual environments (pp. 791-806). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Schulte-Pelkum, J., Riecke, B. E., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Influence of display device and screen curvature on perceiving and controlling simulated egorotations from optic flow (Tech. Rep. No. 122). Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany. Available at www.kyb.mpg.de/publication.html?publ=2574.
52. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of 3-dimensional objects. Science, 777(3972), 701-703.
53. Sholl, M. J. (1989). The relation between horizontality and
54. rod-and-frame and vestibular navigational performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15(1), 110-125.
55. Stumpf, H., & Fay, E. (1983). Schlauchfiguren - Ein Test zur Beurteilung des räumlichen Vorstellungsvermögens. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
56. Tan, D. S., Gergle, D., Scupelli, P., & Pausch, R. (2006). Physically large displays improve performance on spatial tasks. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 13(1), 71-99.
57. Thompson, W. B., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., CreemRegehr, S. H., Loomis, J. M., & Beall, A. C. (2004). Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 13(5), 560-571.
58. Wang, R. F. (2005). Beyond imagination: Perspective change problems revisited. Psicologica, 26(1), 25-38.
59. Wang, R. F., & Simons, D. J. (1999). Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 70(2), 191-210.
60. Warren, R., & Wertheim, A. H. (Eds.). (1990). Perception and control of self-motion. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61. Warren, W. H., Kay, B. A., Zosh, W. D., Duchon, A. P., & Sahuc, S. (2001). Optic flow is used to control human walking. Nature Neuroscience, 4(2), 213-216.
62. Wiener, J. M., Sc Mallot, H. A. (2006). Path complexity does not impair visual path integration. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 6(4), 333-346.
63. Williams, B., Narasimham, G., Rump, B., McNamara, T. P., Carr, T. H., Rieser, J., et al. (2007). Exploring large virtual environments with an HMD when physical space is limited. In ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization.
64. Witmer, B. G., Sc Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225-240.
65. Wong, S. C. P., & Frost, B. J. (1981). The effect of visualvestibular conflict on the latency of steady-state visually induced subjective rotation. Perception &'Psychophysics, 30(3), 228-236.
66. Wraga, M. (2003). Thinking outside the body: An advantage for spatial, updating during imagined versus physical selfrotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29(5), 993-1005.
67. Wraga, M., Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2004). Spatial updating of virtual displays during self- and display rotation. Memory & Cognition, 32(3), 399-415.