Simple user-generated motion cueing can enhance self-motion perception (Vection) in virtual reality

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 104-107

  Riecke, Bernhard E ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Human factors; Motion cueing; Psychophysics; Self motion perception; Self motion simulation; Vection; Virtual reality; Wheelchair

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MOTION COMPENSATION; WHEELCHAIRS;

MOTION CUEING; MOTION PERCEPTION; PANORAMIC PROJECTION; SELF MOTION PERCEPTION; VISUAL VELOCITY;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 34547442481     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1180495.1180517     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. S. S. Chance, F. Gaunet, A. C. Beall, and J. M. Loomis. Locomotion mode affects the updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration. Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(2): 168-178, Apr. 1998.
2. J. Dichgans and T. Brandt. Visual-vestibular interaction: Effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz, and H.-L. Teuber, editors, Perception, volume VIII of Handbook of Sensory Physiology, pages 756-804. Springer, 1978.
3. C. S. Harrison, M. Grant, and B. A. Conway. Haptic interfaces for wheelchair navigation in the built environment. Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 13(5):520-534, Oct. 2004.
4. L. J. Hettinger. Illusory self-motion in virtual environments. In K. M. Stanney, editor, Handbook of Virtual Environments, chapter 23, pages 471-492. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002.
5. J. M. Hollerbach. Locomotion interfaces. In K. M. Stanney, editor, Handbook of Virtual Environments, chapter 11, pages 239-254. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002.
6. R. L. Klatzky, J. M. Loomis, A. C. Beall, S. S. Chance, and R. G. Golledge. Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychol. Sci., 9(4):293-298, 1998.
7. B. D. Lawson, S. A. Sides, and K. A. Hickinbotham. User requirements for perceiving body acceleration. In K. M. Stanney, editor, Handbook of Virtual Environments, chapter 7, pages 135-162. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002.
8. K. Lowther and C. Ware. Vection with large screen 3d imagery. In ACM CHI '96, pages 233-234, 1996.
9. B. E. Riecke, J. Schulte-Pelkum, and F. Caniard. Visually induced linear vection is enhanced by small physical accelerations. In 7th International Multisensory Research Forum (IMRF), 2006.
10. B. E. Riecke, J. Schulte-Pelkum, F. Caniard, and H. H. Bülthoff. Towards lean and elegant self-motion simulation in virtual, reality. In Proceedings of IEEE VR2005, pages 131-138, Bonn, Germany, 2005.
11. R. Warren and A. H. Wertheim, editors. Perception & Control of Self-Motion. Erlbaum, New Jersey, London, 1990.
12. S. C. P. Wong and B. J. Frost. The effect of visual-vestibular conflict on the latency of steady-state visually induced subjective rotation. Perception & Psychophysics, 30(3):228-236, 1981.