Use of cognitive versus perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on the response mode

Psychological Science

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 403-408

  Avraamides, Marios N ^a,c   Klatzky, Roberta L ^b   Loomis, Jack M ^a   Golledge, Reginald G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LOCOMOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SENSATION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

COGNITION; HUMANS; LOCOMOTION; MOTION PERCEPTION; SENSATION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 2942665869     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00692.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Avraamides, M.N. (2003). Spatial updating of environments described in texts. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 402-431.
2. Avraamides, M.N., & Carlson, R.A. (2003). Egocentric organization of spatial activities in imagined navigation. Memory & Cognition, 31, 252-261.
3. De Vega, M., & Rodrigo, M.J. (2001). Updating spatial layouts mediated by pointing and labelling under physical and imaginary rotation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 369-393.
4. Farrell, M.J., & Robertson, I.H. (1998). Mental rotation and the automatic updating of body-center spatial relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 227-233.
5. Klatzky, R.L., Loomis, J.M., Beall, A.C., Chance, S.S., & Golledge, R.G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science, 9, 293-298.
6. Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Golledge, R.G., & Philbeck, J.W. (1999). Human navigation by path integration. In R.G. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 125-151). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7. Philbeck, J.W., Loomis, J.M., & Beall, A.C. (1997). Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 601-612.
8. Presson, C.C., & Montello, D.R. (1994). Updating after rotational and translational body movements: Coordinate structure of perspective space. Perception, 23, 1447-1455.
9. Rieser, J.J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1157-1165.
10. Rieser, J.J., Guth, D.A., & Hill, E.W. (1986). Sensitivity to perspective structure while walking without vision. Perception, 15, 173-188.
11. Shelton, A.L., & McNamara, T.P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102-106.
12. Simons, D.J., & Wang, R.F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9, 315-320.
13. Wraga, M. (2003). Thinking outside the body: An advantage for spatial updating during imagined versus physical self-rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 993-1005.