Contributions of proprioception to navigation in virtual environments

Human Factors

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 489-497

  Grant, Stuart C ^a,b   Magee, Lochlan E ^a,b  

^a DEF AND CIV INST OF ENVIRON MED   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 0031741082     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872098779591296     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Airey, J. M., Rohlf, J. H., & Brooks, F. P., Jr. (1990). Toward image realism with interactive update rates in complex virtual building environments. Computer Graphics, 24(2). 41-48.
2. Baker, R. R. (1980). Goal orientation by blindfolded humans after long-distance displacement: Possible involvement of a magnetic sense. Science, 210, 555-557.
3. Bles, W. (1981). Stepping around: Circular vection and coriolis effects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and Performance IX (pp. 47-61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Böök, A., & Gärling, T. (1981). Maintenance of orientation during locomotion in unfamiliar environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 995-1006.
5. Christiansen, C., Alreu, B. C., & Huffman, R. K. (1996). Creating a virtual environment for brain injury rehabilitation and research: A preliminary report, Journal of Medicine and Virtual Reality, 1, 6-9.
6. Cooper, E. H., & Pantle, A. J. (1967). The total-time hypothesis in verbal learning. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 221-234.
7. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
8. Durlach, N. I., & Mavor, A. S. (1995). Virtual reality: scientific and technological challenges. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9. Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Gould. J. L. (1986). The locale map of honey bees: Do insects have cognitive maps? Science, 232, 861-863.
11. Iwata, H., & Matsuda, K. (1992). Haptic walkthrough simulator: Its design and application to studies on cognitive map. Presented at the International Conference on Artificial Reality and Tele-Existence.
12. Lampton, D. R., Knerr, B. W., Goldberg, S. L., Bliss, J. P., Moshell, J. M., Blau, B. S. & Brian, S. (1995). The virtual environment performance assessment battery (VEPAB): Development and evaluation (Tech. Report 1029). Orlando, FL: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
13. Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Golledge, R. G., Cicinelli, J. G., Pellegrino, J. W., & Fry, P. A. (1993). Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 73-91.
14. Magee, L. M. (1997). Virtual reality simulator (VRS) for training ship handling skills. In R. J. Seidel & P. R. Chatelier (Eds.), Virtual reality, Training's future? Perspectives on virtual reality and related emerging technologies. Proceedings of NATO Defense Research Group (pp. 19-29). New York: Plenum.
15. Mittelstaedt, H., & Mittelstaedt, M. L. (1982). Homing by path integration. In F. Papi & H. G. Wallraff (Eds.), Avion navigation (pp. 290-297). New York: Springer-Verlag.
16. Potegal, M. (1982). Vestibular and neostriatal contributions to spatial organization. In M. Potegal (Ed.), Spatial abilities: Development and physiological foundations (pp. 361-387). New York: Academic.
17. Pressen, C. C., DeLange, N., & Hazelrigg, M. D. (1989). Orientation specificity in spatial memory: What makes a path different from a map of the path? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 887-897.
18. Presson, C. C., & Hazelrigg, M. D. (1984). Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 716-722.
19. Psotka, J. (1995). Immersive training systems: Virtual reality and education and training. Instructional Science, 23, 405-431.
20. Psotka, J., & Lewis, S. A. (1995). Effects of field of view on judgments of self-location: Distance estimations using planview representations as a function of observer eye station points (ESP) and geometric field of view (FOVg). World Wide Web http://205.130.63.7/fovtr.html.
21. Psotka, J., & Ressler, S. (1994). Immersion and navigation in the open virtual reality testbed. World Wide Web http://immersion. ari.fed.us/ovrt.html.
22. Regian, J. W., & Shebilske, W. (1992). Virtual reality: An instructional medium for visual-spatial tasks. Journal of Communications, 42, 136-149.
23. Schmuckler, M. A. (1995). Self-knowledge of body position: Integration of perceptual and action system information. In P. Rochat (Ed.), The self in infancy: Theory and research (pp. 221-241). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
24. Slater, M., Usoh, M., & Steed, A. (1995). Taking steps: The influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 2, 201-219.
25. Taylor, M. M., & Creelman, C. D. (1967). PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 782-787.
26. Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 560-589.
27. Witmer, B. G., Bailey, J. H., & Knerr, B. W. (1996). Virtual spaces and real world places: Transfer of route knowledge. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 413-428.