Evidence-based professional development of science teachers in two countries

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 577-591

  Harrison, Christine ^a   Hofstein, Avi ^b   Eylon, Bat Sheva ^b   Simon, Shirley ^c  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41149086342     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690701854832     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ball, D. L. (2004) Professional development through records of instruction
2. Ball, D. L. and Cohen, D. K. (1999) Developing practice, developing practionaires: Towards a practice-based theory of professional education. Teaching as the learning profession, pp. 3-31. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
3. Bell, B. and Gilbert, L. (1994) Teacher development as personal, professional, and social development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, pp. 483-497.
4. Bell, B. and Gilbert, J. (1996) Teacher development: A model from science education, Routledge Falmer, London
5. Borko, H. and Putnam, R. (1996) Learning to teach. Handbook of educational psychology, pp. 673-708. Macmillan, New York
6. Borko, H. (2004) Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researchers, 33:8, pp. 3-15.
7. Cochran-Smith, M. (1994) The power of teacher research in teacher education. Teacher research & education reform, pp. 142-165. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
8. Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Evans, D. and Firth, A. (2005) The impact of collaborative CPD on classroom teaching and learning. Review: What do teacher impact data tell us about collaborative CPD?. Research Evidence in Education Library, EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London
9. Davis, L. K. and Honan M. T (1998) Reflections on the use of teams to support the portfolio process. With portfolio in hand: Validating the new professionalism, pp. 90-102. Teachers College Press, New York
10. Dinham, S. and Scott, C. (2003) Benefits to teachers of the professional learning portfolio: A case study. Teacher Development, 7:2, pp. 229-243.
11. Grant, G. E. and Huebner, T. A. (1998) The portfolio question: A powerful synthesis of the personal and professional. Teacher Educational Quarterly, 25:1, pp. 33-43.
12. (1995) Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices, Teacher College Press, New York
13. Harrison, C. (2005) Teachers development of assessment for learning: Mapping teacher change. Journal of Teacher Development, 9:2, pp. 255-263.
14. Hoban, G. (2002) Teacher learning for educational change, Open University Press, Buckingham, UK
15. Hogan, K. and Berkowitz, A. (2000) Teachers as inquiry learners. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11:1, pp. 1-25.
16. Hutchings, P. and Shulman, L. S. (1999) The scholarship of teaching-New elaborations, new developments. Change, 31:5, pp. 10-15.
17. Joyce, B. and Showers, B. (1988) Student achievement through staff development, Longman, White Plains, NY
18. Kennedy, A. (2005) Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Journal of In-Service Education, 31:2, pp. 235-250.
19. Klenowski, V. (2002) Developing portfolios for learning and assessment, Routledge Falmer, London
20. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press, New York
21. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K., Mundry, S. and Hewson, P. (2003) Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics, Corwin Press Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA
22. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P., Love, N. and Stiles, K. E. (1998) Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics, Crowin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA
23. (1998) With portfolio in hand: Validating the new professionalism, Teachers College Press, New York
24. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J. and Borko, H. (1999) Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. Pedagogical content knowledge and science education, pp. 95-132. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
25. Marx, R. W., Freeman, J. G., Krajcik, J. S. and Blumenfeld, P. C. (1998) Professional development of science teachers. International handbook of science education, pp. 681-694. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
26. Munby, H., Cunningham, M. and Lock, C. (2000) School science culture: A case study of barriers to developing professional knowledge. Science Education, 84, pp. 193-211.
27. Orland-Barak, L. (2005) Lost in translation: Mentors learning to participate in competing discourses of practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 56:4, pp. 355-366.
28. Priestly, M. and Sime, D. (2005) Formative assessment for all: A whole school approach to pedagogic change. The Curriculum Journal, 16:4, pp. 475-492.
29. Putnam, R. and Borko, H. (2000) What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?. Educational Researchers, 29:1, pp. 4-15.
30. Ruddock, J. (1991) Professional development in school, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
31. Shulman, L. (1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57:1, pp. 1-22.
32. Shulman, L. (1992) Portfolios in teacher education: A component of reflective teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association San Francisco, CA, USA
33. Shulman, L. S. and Shulman, J. H. (2004) How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36:2, pp. 257-271.
34. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1994) Grounded theory methodology: An overview. Handbook of qualitative research, pp. 1-18. Sage, London