Formative assessment for all: A whole-school approach to pedagogic change

Curriculum Journal

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 475-492

  Priestley, Mark ^a   Sime, Daniela ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment for learning; Change; Formative assessment; Innovation; Morphogenesis; Morphostasis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869185094     PISSN: 09585176     EISSN: 14693704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09585170500384586     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Archer, M., 1988. Culture and agency: the place of culture in social theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Black, P., and Wiliam, D., 1998a. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5: 7–68.
3. Black, P., and Wiliam, D., 1998b. Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment, London: King's College.
4. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., and Wiliam, D., 2002. Working inside the black box: assessment for learning in the classroom, London: King's College.
5. Boreham, N., 3–5 March 2005. “ Organizational learning as the structuration of organizational enquiry, paper presented to the ”. In International Conference on the Learning Potential of the Workplace 3–5 March, Enschede, Netherlands
6. Boreham, N., and Morgan, C., 2004. A sociocultural analysis of organizational learning. Oxford Review of Education, 30 (3): 307–326.
7. Codd, J. A., 1999. Educational reform, accountability and the culture of distrust. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 34 (1): 45–53.
8. Cowley, T., and Williamson, J., 1998. A recipe for success? Localized implementation of a (flexible) National Curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 9 (1): 79–94.
9. Cuban, L., How schools change reforms: redefining reform success and failure. Teachers College Record, 99 (3) 453–477.
10. Diamond, J., 2005. Collapse: how societies choose to fail or survive, London: Allen Lane.
11. Doyle, W., and Ponder, G. A., 1977. The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making. Interchange, 8 (1): 1–12.
12. Fullan, M., 1993. Change forces: probing the depths of educational reform, London: Falmer Press.
13. Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Leithwood, K., and Jantzi, D., 2003. Transformational leadership effects on teachers' commitment and effort toward school reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 41 (3): 228–256.
14. Hallam, S., Kirton, A., Peffers, J., Robertson, P., and Stobart, G., 2004. Evaluation of Project 1 of the Assessment is for Learning development programme: support for professional practice in formative assessment, final report.: 397–416. Available online at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/education/ep1aldps-00.asp (accessed 17 May 2005)
15. Hayward, L., Kane, J., and Cogan, N., 2000. Improving assessment in Scotland: report of the national consultation on assessment in Scotland, Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
16. Hayward, L., Priestley, M., and Young, M., 2004. Ruffling the calm of the ocean floor: merging practice, policy and research in assessment in Scotland. Oxford Review of Education, 30 (3): 397–416.
17. Helsby, G., and McCulloch, G., eds. 1997. Teachers and the National Curriculum, London: Cassell.
18. Hutchinson, C., and Hayward, L., 2005. The journey so far: assessment for learning in Scotland. The Curriculum Journal, 16 (2): 225–248.
19. Levin, B., 1998. An epidemic of education policy: (what) can we learn from each other?. Comparative Education, 34 (2): 131–141.
20. LTScotland. 2002. Issue One (Glasgow, LTScotland). Assessment is for Learning, Available online at: http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/assess/about/newsletter/issue1.asp (accessed 17 May 2005).
21. LTScotland. 2005. Assessment Online Toolkit, Available online at: http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/assess/about/newsletter/issue1.asp (accessed 17 May 2005).
22. Popkewitz, T. S., 1997. The production of reason and power: curriculum history and intellectual traditions. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29 (2): 131–164.
23. Priestley, M., 2005. Making the most of the Curriculum Review: some reflections on supporting and sustaining change in schools. Scottish Educational Review, 37 (1): 29–38.
24. Ruddock, J., 1991. Innovation and change, Buckingham: Open University Press.
25. Sime, D., and Priestley, M., 2005. Introducing formative assessment: the case study of a Scottish school, Stirling: University of Stirling.
26. Spillane, J. P., 1999. External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice: the mediating role of teachers' zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31 (2): 143–175.
27. Swann, J., and Brown, S., 1997. The implementation of a National Curriculum and teachers' classroom thinking. Research Papers in Education: policy and practice, 12 (1): 91–114.
28. Torrance, H., 1997. “ Assessment, accountability, and standards: using assessment to control the reform of schooling ”. In Education: culture, economy, society, Edited by: Halsey, A. H., Lauder, H., Brown, P., and Wells, A. S., 320–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Torrance, H., and Pryor, J., 2001. Developing formative assessment in the classroom: using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27 (5): 615–631.
30. Vygotsky, L. S., 1978. Mind in society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.