Why should we care about molecular coevolution?

Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Volumn 2008, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 237-246

  Codoñer, Francisco M ^a,b   Fares, Mario A ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Molecular coevolution; Mutual Information Content; Non parametric methods; Parametric methods; Protein protein interactions

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COEVOLUTION; COVARIANCE; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PARAMETRIC TEST; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC MODEL; STRUCTURAL GENOMICS;

EID: 41049083552     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11769343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Atchley, W.R., Wollenberg, K.R., Fitch, W.M., Terhalle, W. and Dress, A.W. 2000. Correlations among amino acid sites in bBLH protein domains: an information theoretic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol., 17:164-78.
2. Atwell, S., Ultsch, M., de Vos, A.M. and Wells, J.A. 1997. Structural plasticity in a remodeled protein-protein interface. Science, 278:1125-8.
3. Bastolla, U., Porto, M., Roman, H.E. and Vendruscolo, M. 2003. Statistical properties of neutral evolution. J. Mol. Evol., 57(Suppl 1): S103-119.
4. Bastolla, U., Vendruscolo, M. and Knapp, E.W. 2000. A statistical mechanical method to optimize energy functions for protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 97:3977-81.
5. Blahut, R.E. 1987. Information theory and statistics. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA.
6. Buck, M.J. and Atchley, W. R. 2005. Networks of coevolving sites in structural and functional domains of serpin proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol., 22:1627-34.
7. Chelvanayagam, G., Eggenschwilker, A., Knecht, L., Gonnet, G.H. and Benner, S.A. 1997. An analysis of simultaneous variation in protein structures. Protein Engineering, 10:307-16.
8. Chen, J. and Yuan, B. 2006. Detecting functional modules in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Bioinformatics, 22:2283-90.
9. Chen, X-W., Anantha, G. and Wang, X. 2006. An effective structure learning method for constructing gene networks. Bioinformatics, 22:1367-74.
10. Choi, S.S., Li, W. and Lahn, B.T. 2005. Robust signals of coevolution of interacting residues in mammalian proteomes identified by phylogeny-aided structural analysis. Nat. Genet., 37:1367-71.
11. Clarke, N.D. 1995. Covariation residues in the homeodomain sequence family. Protein Sci., 4:2269-78.
12. Codoñer, F.M., Fares, M.A. and Elena, S.F. 2006. Adaptative Covariation between the coat and the movement proteins of Prunus Necrotic Ringspot Virus. J. Virol., 80:5833-40.
13. Dandekar, T., Snel, B., Huynen, M. and Bork, P. 1998. Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. Trends Biochem. Sci., 23:324-8.
14. Date, S.V. and Marcotte, E.M. 2003. Discovery of uncharacterized cellular systems by genome-wide analysis of functional linkages. Nature Biotechnol., 21:1055-62.
15. Deng, M., Mehta, S.; Sun, F. and Chen, T. 2002. Inferring Domain-Domain interactions from protein-protein interactions. Genome Research, 12:1540-8.
16. Dimmic, M.W., Hubisz, M.J., Bustamante, C.D. and Nielsen, R. 2005. Detecting coevolving amino acid sites using Bayesian mutational mapping. Bioinformatics, 21:i126-35.
17. Farber, R., Lapedes, A. and Sirotkin, K. 1992. Determination of eukaryotic protein coding regions using neutral networks and information theory. J. Mol. Biol., 226:471-9.
18. Fares, M.A. 2006. Computational and statistical methods to explore the various dimensions of protein evolution. Curr. Bioinf., 1:207-17.
19. Fares, M.A. and McNally, D. 2006. CAPS: Coevolution Analysis using Protein Sequences. Bioinformatics, 22:2821-2.
20. Fares, M.A. and Travers, S.A.A. 2006. A novel method for detecting intra-molecular coevolution: adding a further dimension to selective constraints analyses. Genetics, 173:9-23.
21. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat., 15:1-15.
22. Fitch, W.M. 1971. Rate of change of concomitantly variable codons. J. Mol. Evol., 1:84-96.
23. Fitch, W.M. and Markowitz, E. 1970. An improved method for determining codon variability in a gene and its application to the rate of fixation of mutations in evolution Biochem. Genetics, 4:579-3.
24. Fodor, A. A and Aldrich, R. W. 2004. Influence of conservation on calculations of amino acid covariance in multiple sequence alignments. Proteins, 56:211-21.
25. Fraser, H.B., Hirsh, A.E., Wall, D.P. and Eisen, M.B. 2004. Coevolution of gene expression among interacting proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 101:9033-8.
26. Friedber, I. and Margalit, H. 2002. Persistently conserved positions in structurally similar, sequences dissimilar proteins: roles in preserving protein fold and function. Protein Sci., 11:350-60.
27. Fryxell, K.J. 1996. The coevolution of gene family trees. Trends Genet., 12:364-9.
28. Fukami-Kobayashi, K., Schreiber, D.R. and Benner, S.A. 2002. Detecting compensatory covariation signals in protein evolution using reconstructed ancestral sequences. J. Mol. Biol., 319:729-43.
29. Gloor, G.B., Martin, L.C., Wahl, L.M. and Dunn, S.D. 2005. Mutual information in protein multiple alignments reveals two classes of coevolving positions. Biochemistry, 44:7156-65.
30. Göbel, U., Sander, C., Schneider, R. and Valencia, A. 1994. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins, 18:309-17.
31. Goh Ch, S., Bogan, A.A., Joachimiak, M., Walther, D. and Cohen, F.E. 2000. Coevolution of proteins with their interaction partners. J. Mol. Biol., 299:283-93.
32. Goh Ch, S. and Cohen, F.E. 2002. Coevolutionary analysis reveals insights into protein-protein interactions. J. Mol. Biol., 324:177-92.
33. Hamilton, N., Burrage, K., Ragan, M.A. and Huber, T. 2004. Protein contact prediction using paterns of correlation. Proteins, 56:679-84.
34. Hoffman, N.G., Schiffer, C.A. and Swanstrom, R. 2003. Covariation of amino acid positions in HIV-protease. Virology, 314:536-48.
35. Hughes, A. L and Nei, M. 1988. Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature, 335:167-170.
36. Hummel, J., Keshvari, N., Weckwerth, W. and Selbig, J. 2005. Species-specific analysis of protein sequence motifs using mutual information. BMC Bioinformatics, 6:164-70.
37. Janzen, D.H. 1980. When is it coevolution?. Evolution, 34:611-2.
38. Jothi, R., Cherukuri, P.F., Tansneem, A. and Przytycka, T.M. 2006. Coevolutionary analysis of domains in interacting proteins reveals insights into domain-domain interactions mediating protein-protein interactions. J. Mol. Biol., 362:861-75.
39. Ju, B.-H., Park, B., Park, J.H. and Han, K. 2003. Visualization and analysis of protein interactions. Bioinformatics, 19:317-8.
40. Kim, W.K., Bolser, D.M. and Park, J.H. 2004. Large-scale coevolution analysis of protein structural interlogues using the global protein structural interactome map (PSIMAP). Bioinformatics, 20:1138-50.
41. Kim, Y., Koyutürk, M., Topkara, U., Grama, A. and Subramaniam, S. 2006. Inferring functional information from domain coevolution. Bioinformatics, 22:40-9.
42. Kim, Y. and Subramaniam, S. 2006. Locally defined protein phylogenetic profiles reveal previously missed protein interactions and functional relationships. Proteins, 62:1115-24.
43. Kimura, M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature, 217:624-626.
44. Korber, B.T., Farber, R.M., Wolpert, D.H. and Lapedes, A.S. 1993. Covariation of mutations in the V3 loop of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope protein: an information theoretic analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 90:7176-80.
45. Kullback, S. 1959. Information theory and statistics Wiley, New York, N.Y.
46. Martin, L.C., Gloor, G.B., Dunn, S.D. and Wahl, L.M. 2005. Using information theory to search for co-evolving residues in proteins. Bioinformatics, 21:4116-24.
47. Mintseris, J. and Weng, Z. 2005. Structure function and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 102:10930-5.
48. Mirny, L.A. and Shakhnovich, E.L. 1999. Universally conserved positions in protein folds: reading evolutionary signals about stability, folding kinetics and function. J. Mol. Biol., 291:177-96.
49. Moyle, W.R., Campbell, R.K., Myers, R.V., Bernard, M.P., Han, Y. and Wang, X. 1994. Coevolution of ligand-receptor pairs. Nature, 368:251-5.
50. Neher, E. 1994. How frequent are correlated changes in families of protein sequences?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 91:98-102.
51. Nimrod, G., Glaser, F., Steinberg, D., Ben-Tal, N. and Pupko, T. 2005. In silico identification of functional regions in proteins. Bioinformatics, 21:i328-37.
52. Olivera, L., Paiva, A.C.M and Vriend, G. 2002. Correlated mutation apalyses on very large sequence families. ChemBioChem., 3:1010-7.
53. Oliveira, L., Paiva, A.C.M, Paiva, G. and Vriend, G. 2003. Identification of functionally conserved residues with the use of entropy-variability plots. Proteins, 52:544-52.
54. Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. Roy. Soc. London ser. B., 255:37-45.
55. Pazos, F. and Valencia, A. 2001. Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. Protein Engineering, 14:609-14.
56. Pazos, F. and Valencia, A. 2002. In silico two-hybrid system for Selection of physically interacting protein pairs. Proteins, 47:219-27.
57. Pazos, F., Helmer-Citterich, M., Ausiello, G. and Valencia, A. 1997. Correlated mutations contain information-about protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol., 271:511-23.
58. Pazos, F., Ranea, J.A.G, Juan, D. and Strenberg, M.J.E. 2005. Assessing protein coevolution in the context of the tree life assists in the prediction of the interactome. J. Mol. Biol., 352:1002-15.
59. Pei, J., Cai, W., Kinc, L.N. and Grishin, N.V. 2006. Prediction of functional specificity determinants from protein sequeces using log-likelihood ratios. Bioinformatics, 22:164-71.
60. Pellegrini, M., Marcotte, E.M., Thompson, M.J., Eisenberg, D. and Yeates, T.O. 1999. Assigning protein furietions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 96:4285-8.
61. Pollock, D.D. and Taylor, W.R. 1997. Effectiveness of correlation analysis in identifying protein residues undergoing correlated evolution. Protein Engineering, 6:647-57.
62. Pollock, D.D., Taylor, W.R. and Goldman, N. 1999. Coevolving protein residues: maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure. J. Mol. Biol., 287:187-98.
63. Pritchard, L., Bladon, P., Mitchell, J.M.O and Dufton, M.J. 2001. Evaluation of a anovel method for the identification of coevolving protein residues. Protein Engineering, 14:549-55.
64. Ramani, A.K. and Marcotte, E.M. 2003. Exploiting the coevolution of interacting proteins to discover interaction specificity. J. Mol. Biol., 327:273-84.
65. Rzhetsky, A. 1995. Estimating substitution rates in ribosomal RNA genes. Mol. Biol. Evol., 141:771-83.
66. Sander, C. and Schneider, R. 1993. The HSSP data base of protein structure-sequence alignments. Nucleic Acid Res., 21:3105-9.
67. Schoniger, M. and von Haeseler, A. 1994. A stochastic model for the evolution of autocorrelated DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet Evol., 3:240-7.
68. Taylor, W.R. and Hatrick, K. 1994. Compensating changes in protein multiple sequences alignments. Protein Engineering, 7:341-8.
69. Tillier, E.R.M and Lui, T.W.H. 2003. Using multiple interdependency to separate functional from phylogentic correlations in protein alignments. Bioinformatics, 19:750-5.
70. Tillier, E.R., Biro, L., Li, G. and Tillo, D. 2006. Codep: maximizing coevolutionary interdependencies to discover interacting proteins. Proteins, 63:822-31.
71. Travers, S.A.A and Fares, M.A. 2007. Functional coevolutionary networks of the Hsp70-Hop-Hsp90 system revealed through computational analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol., Ahead publication.
72. Van Kesteren, R.E., Tensen, C.P., Smit, A.B., van Minnen, J., Kolakowski, L.F., Meyerhof, W., Richter, D., van Heerikhuizen, H., Vreugdenhil, E. and Geraerts, W.P. 1996. Coevolution of ligand-receptor pairs in the vasopressin/oxytocin superfamily of bioactive peptides. J. Biol. Chem., 271:3619-26.
73. Waddell, P.J., Kishino, H. and Ota, R. 2006. Phylogenetic methodology for detecting protein interactions. Mol. Biol. Evol., Ahead publication.
74. Weckwerth, W. and Selbig, J. 2003. Scoring and identifying organism-specific functional patterns and putative phosphorylation sites in protein sequences using mutual information. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 307:516-21.
75. Wollenberg, K.R. and Atchley, W.R. 2000. Separation of phylogentic and functional associations in biological sequences by using the parametric bootstrap. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 97:3288-91.
76. Wood, T.C. and Pearson, W.R. 1999. Evolution of protein sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol., 291:977-95.
77. Yi, S., Bernat, B., Pal, G., Kossiakoff, A. and Li, W.-H. 2002. Functional pro iscuity of squirrel monkey growth hormone receptor toward both primate and nonprimate growth hormone. Mol. Biol. Evol., 19:1083-92.
78. Yu, H. and Gerstein, M. 2006. Genomic analysis of the hierarchical structure of regulatory networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 103:14724-31.
79. Zeng, Y., Roberts, R.J. and Kasif, S. 2002. Genomic functional annotation using coevolution profiles of gene clusters. Genome Biology, 3: research0060.1-0060.9.