The emergence and effects of deviants in low and high status groups

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 611-617

  Scheepers, Daan ^a   Branscombe, Nyla R ^b   Spears, Russell ^a   Doosje, Bertjan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036873587     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00506-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906-912.
2. Bettencourt, B. A., & Bartholow, B. D. (1998). The importance of status legitimacy and inter-group attitudes among numerical minorities. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 759-775.
3. Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threats. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
4. Branscombe, N. R., Wann, D. L., Noel, J. G., & Coleman, J. (1993). In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 381-388.
5. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intra-group variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.
6. Doosje, B., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Koomen, W. (1999). Perceived group variability in inter-group relations: The distinctive role of social identity. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 41-74). Chichester, England: Wiley.
7. Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778.
8. Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. J. (2001). The link between leadership and followership: How affirming social identity translates vision into action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1469-1479.
9. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology qf group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
10. Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Revieiv, 5, 184-200.
11. Hogg, M. A., Hardie, E. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (1995). Prototypical similarity, self-categorization, and depersonalized attraction: A perspective on group cohesiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 159-177.
12. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1996). Inter-group norms and inter-group discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71,1222-1233.
13. Jost, J. T. (2001). Out-group favoritism and the theory of system justification: An experimental paradigm for investigating the effects of socio-economic success on stereotype content. In G. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 89-102). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Jost, J. T., & Major, B. (Eds.). (2001). The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and inter-group relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 293-355). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
16. Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., Paez, D., & Martinez-Taboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976-988.
17. Marques, J. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards in-group members in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287-292.
18. Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. P. (1988). The "black sheep" effect: extremity of judgments towards in-group members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
19. Mullen, B., Brown, R. J., & Smith, C. (1992). In-group bias as a function of category salience, relevance and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
20. Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1999). Commitment and the context of social perception. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 59-83). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
21. Tajfel, H., Flament, C., Billig, M. G., & Bundy, R. P. (1971). Social categorization and inter-group behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-177.
22. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In W, G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
23. Turner, J. C., & Brown, R. (1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives and inter-group relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 202-234). London: Academic Press.