Why social dominance theory has been falsified

British Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 199-206

  Turner, John C ^a   Reynolds, Katherine J ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; BIOLOGY; CONFLICT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RECUMBENCY; REVIEW; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL DOMINANCE;

BIOLOGY; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DECEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL DOMINANCE;

EID: 0141484529     PISSN: 01446665     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/014466603322127184     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other 'authoritarian personality'. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47-92.
2. Federico, C. M. (1998). The interactive effects of social dominance orientation, group status, and perceived stability on favoritism for high-status groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2(2), 119-143.
3. Jost, J. T., & Major. B. (Eds.) (2001). The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232.
5. Kershaw, I. (1998/2000). Hitler. Vols 1 and 2: 1889-1936 Hubris and 1936-1945 Nemesis. London: Penguin Books.
6. Levin, S., Federico, C. M., Sidanius, J., & Rabinowitz, J. L. (2002). Social dominance orientation and intergroup bias: The legitimation of favoritism for high-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 144-157.
7. McGarty, C. (2001). Social identity theory does not maintain that identification produces bias, and self-categorization theory does not maintain that salience is identification: Two comments on Mummendey, Klink, and Brown. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(2), 173-176.
8. Rabinowitz, J. L. (1999). Go with the flow or fight the power? The interactive effects of social dominance orientation and perceived injustice on support for the status quo. Political Psychology, 20(1), 1-24.
9. Reicher, S. D. (2000, July). Putting social categories into practice: A defence and extension of the social identity tradition. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Seattle, Washington.
10. Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., Haslam, S. A., & Ryan, M. K. (2001). The role of personality and group factors in explaining prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(5), 427-434.
11. Sidanius, J. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In S. lyengar & W. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 183-219). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
12. Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Federico, C. M., & Pratto, F. (2001). Legitimizing ideologies: The social dominance approach. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 307-311). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Rabinowitz, J. L., & Federico, C. M. (2000). Peering into the jaws of the beast: The integrative dynamics of social identity, symbolic racism, and social dominance. In D. A. Prentice & D. T. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 80-131). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14. Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Kappen, D. M. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity? British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161-186.
15. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
16. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes: Open University Press and Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
17. Turner, J. C. (1999a). The prejudiced personality and social change: A self-categorization perspective. Tajfel Memorial Lecture, 12th General Meeting of the EAESP, Oxford, UK (revised for the Freilich Foundation Lecture series, ANU, 2001).
18. Turner, J. C. (1999b). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6-34). Oxford:Blackwell.
19. Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1997). The socially structured mind. In C. McGarty & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society (pp. 355-373). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
20. Wilson, M. S., & Lui, J. H. (2003). Social dominance orientation and gender: The moderating role of gender identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 187-198.