Social dominance theory and the dynamics of inequality: A reply to Schmitt, Branscombe, & Kappen and Wilson & Liu

British Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 207-213

  Sidanius, Jim ^a   Pratto, Felicia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NOTE; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOCIAL DOMINANCE;

FEMALE; HIERARCHY, SOCIAL; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOCIAL DOMINANCE;

EID: 0141484528     PISSN: 01446665     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/014466603322127193     Document Type: Note

References (45)

1. Allen, M. W., Wilson, M., Ng, S. H., & Dunnc, M. (2000). Values and beliefs of vegetarians and omnivores. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 405-422.
2. Bamberger, J. (1974). The myth of matriarchy: Why men rule in primitive society. In M. Z. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.), Woman, culture and society (pp. 263-280). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3. Bates. C., & Heaven, P. C. L. (2001). Altitudes to women in society: The role of social dominance orientation and social values. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 43-49.
4. Capps, J. S. (2002). Explaining punitiveness: Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance. North American Journal of Psychology, 4, 263-278.
5. Dambrun, M., Guimond, S., & Duarte, S. (2002). The impact of hierarchy-enhancing vs. attenuating academic major on stereotyping: The mediating role of perceived social norms. Current Research in Social Psychology, 7, 114-136.
6. Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75-93.
7. Duriez, B., & van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199-1213.
8. Goldberg, S. (1994). Why men rule: A theory of male dominance. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
9. Heaven, P. C. L., Greene, R. L., Stones, C. R., & Caputi, P. (2000). Levels of social dominance orientation in three societies. Journal of Social Psychology, 140. 530-532.
10. Jackson, L, M. & Esses, V. M. (2000). Effects of perceived economic competition on people's willingness to help empower immigrants. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3, 419-435.
11. Jost, J., & Major, B. (2001). The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Kurzban, R., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 15387-15392.
13. Lenski, G. E. (1984). Power and privilege: A theory of social stratification. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
14. Levin, S. & Sidanius, J. (1999). Social dominance and social identity in the United States and Israel: Ingroup favoritism or outgroup derogation? Political Psychology, 20, 99-126.
15. Mattinez. C., Paterna, C., Rosa, A. I., & Angosto, J. (2000). El principio de jererguia social como explication: Del prejuicio y el rechazo a la accion positiva [The principle of social hierarchy as explanation: From prejudice and rejection to positive action]. Psicologia-Politica, 21, 55-71.
16. Mitchell, M., & Sidanius, (1995). Social hierarchy and executions in the United States: A social dominance perspective. The death penalty: A social dominance perspective. Political Psychology, 16, 591-619.
17. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
18. Nelson, L. L., & Milburn, T. W. (1999). Relationships between problem-solving competencies and militaristic attitudes: Implications for peace education. Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology, 5, 149-168.
19. Pratto, F. (1999). The puzzle of continuing inequality: Piecing together, psychological, social and cultural forces in social dominance theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 191-263). New York: Academic Press.
20. Pratto, F., & Hegarty, P. (2000). The political psychology of reproductive strategies. Psychological Sciences, 11, 57-62.
21. Pratto, F., Liu, J. H., Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Shih, M., Bachrach, H., & Hegarty, P. (2000). Social dominance orientation and the legitimization of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 369-409.
22. Pratto, F., & Shih, M. (2000). Social dominance orientation and group context in implicit group prejudice. Psychological Sciences, 11, 521-524.
23. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A Personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
24. Pratto, F., Stallworth, L., & Sidanius, J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49-68.
25. Pratto, F., Stallworth, L., Sidanius, J., & Siers, B. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 37-53.
26. Pratto, F., Tatar, D. G., & Conway-Lanz, S. (1999). Who gets what and why: Determinants of social allocations. Political Psychology, 20, 127-150.
27. Reicher, S. (in press). The context of social identity: Domination, resistance and change. Political Psychology.
28. Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Kappen, D. M. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity? British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161-186.
29. Sidanius, J., & Kurzban, R. (in press). Evolutionary approaches to political psychology. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Handbook of political psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Federico, C., & Pratto, F. (2001). Legitimizing ideologies: The social dominance approach. In J. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 307-331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Liu, J. H., & Pratto, F. (2000). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41-67.
32. Sidanius, J., & Liu, J. (1992). Racism, support for the Persian Gulf War, and the police beating of Rodney King: A social dominance perspective. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 685-700.
33. Sidanius, J., Liu, J., Pratto, F., & Shaw, J. (1994). Social dominance orientation, hierarchy attenuators and hierarchy-enhancers: Social dominance theory and the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 338-366.
34. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Sidanius, J. Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476-490.
36. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Mitchell, M. (1994). Ingroup identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 151-167.
37. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Sinclair, S., & van Laar, C. (1996). Mother Teresa meets Genghis Khan: The dialectics of hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating career choices. Social Justice Research, 9, 145-170.
38. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (in press). Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology.
39. Sidanius, J., van Laar, C., Levin, S., & Sinclair, S. (2002). Social hierarchy maintenance and the allocation of social roles: A social dominance perspective. Working Paper no. 193. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
40. Sidanius, J., & Veniegas, R. C. (2000). Gender and race discrimination: The interactive nature of disadvantage. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination: The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (pp. 47-69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2002). Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 965-976.
42. van Laar, C., Sidanius, J., Rabinowitz, J., & Sinclair, S. (1999). The three Rs of academic achievement: Reading, 'Riting, and Racism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 139-151.
43. Wagner, U., van Dick, R., & Zick, A. (2001). Social psychological awareness and explanations for hostility toward foreigners in Germany [Sozialpsychologische Analysen und Erklaerungen von Fremdenfeindlichkeit in Deutschland], Zeitschriftfuer Sozialpsychologie, 32, 59-79.
44. Whitley, B. E. Jr., & Aegisdottir, S. (2000). The gender belief system, authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sex Roles, 42, 947-967.
45. Wilson, M. S., & Liu, J. H. (2003). Social dominance orientation and gender: The moderating role of gender identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 187-198.