Contrasting patterns of selection at Pinus pinaster Ait. Drought stress candidate genes as revealed by genetic differentiation analyses

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 417-437

  Eveno, Emmanuelle ^a   Collada, Carmen ^b   Guevara, M Angeles ^b   Léger, Valérie ^a   Soto, Alvaro ^b   Díaz, Luis ^b   Léger, Patrick ^a   González Martínez, Santiago C ^b   Cervera, M Teresa ^b   Plomion, Christophe ^a   Garnier Géré, Pauline H ^a  

^a UMR 1202 BIOGECO   (France)

^b Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria   (Spain)

Author keywords

Adaptive evolution; Candidate genes; Drought stress; Pinus pinaster

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; DROUGHT; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; NATURAL SELECTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PINE; PINUS PINASTER; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SEED; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STRESS;

MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PINUS; SELECTION (GENETICS); VARIATION (GENETICS); WATER;

PINUS PINASTER;

EID: 38949167127     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm272     Document Type: Article

References (141)

1. Acheré V, Favre JM, Besnard G, Jeandroz S. 2005. Genomic organization of molecular differentiation in Norway spruce (Picea abies). Mol Ecol. 14:3191-3201.
2. Aitken SN, Hannerz M. 2001. Genecology and gene resource management strategies for conifer cold hardiness. In: Bigras FJ, Columbo SJ, editors. Conifer cold hardiness. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 23-53.
3. Alía R, Gil L, Pardos J. 1995. Performance of 43 Pinus pinaster Ait. provenances on 5 locations in central Spain. Silvae Genet. 44:75-81.
4. Alía R, Moro J, Denis JB. 1997. Performance of Pinus pinaster Ait. provenances in Spain: interpretation of the genotype-environment interaction. Can J For Res. 27:1548-1559.
5. Andersen JR, Schrag T, Melchinger AE, Zein I, Lubberstedt T. 2005. Validation of Dwarf8 polymorphisms associated with flowering time in elite European inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.). Theor Appl Genet. 111:206-217.
6. Andofalto P. 2001. Adaptive hitchhiking effects on genome variability. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 11:635-641.
7. Baines JF, Das A, Mousset S, Stephan W. 2004. The role of natural selection in genetic differentiation of worldwide populations of Drosophila ananassae. Genetics. 168:1987-1998.
8. Balding DJ. 2003. Likelihood-based inference for genetic correlation coefficients. Theor Popul Biol. 63:221-230.
9. Barton NH, Keightley PD. 2002. Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nat Rev Genet. 3:11-20.
10. ST tell us? Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:435-440.
11. Beaumont MA, Balding DJ. 2004. Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans. Mol Ecol. 13:969-980.
12. Beaumont MA, Nichols RA. 1996. Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proc R Soc Lond. B. 263:1619-1626.
13. Biswas S, Akey JM. 2006. Genomic insights into positive selection. Trends in Genetics. 22:437-446.
14. Bonin A, Taberlet P, Miaud C, Pompanon F. 2006. Explorative genome scan to detect candidate loci for adaptation along a gradient of altitude in the common frog (Rana temporaria). Mol Biol Evol. 23:773-783.
15. Borevitz JO, Chory J. 2004. Genomic tools for QTL analysis and gene discovery. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 7:132-136.
16. Bray EA. 1997. Plant responses to water deficit. Trends Plant Sci. 2:48-54.
17. Brendel O, Pot D, Plomion C, Rozenberg P, Guehl JM. 2002. Genetic parameters and QTL analysis of delta C-13 and ring width in maritime pine. Plant Cell Environ. 25:945-953.
18. Brohede J, Ellegren H. 1999. Microsatellite evolution: polarity of substitutions within repeats and neutrality of flanking sequences. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 266:825-833.
19. Brown GR, Gill GP, Kuntz RJ, Langley CH, Neale DB. 2004. Nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium in loblolly pine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:15255-15260.
20. Bucci G, González-Martínez SC, Le Provost G, Plomion C, Ribeiro MM, Sebastiani F, Alía R, Vendramin GG. 2007. Range-wide phylogeography and gene zones in Pinus pinaster Ait. revealed by chloroplast microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol. 16:2137-2153.
21. Buntjer JB, Sorensen AP, Peleman JD. 2005. Haplotype diversity: the link between statistical and biological association. Trends Plant Sci. 10(10):466-471.
22. Burban C, Petit RJ. 2003. Phylogeography of maritime pine inferred with organelle markers having contrasted inheritance. Mol Ecol. 12:1487-1495.
23. Campbell D, Bernatchez L. 2004. Generic scan using AFLP markers as a means to assess the role of directional selection in the divergence of sympatric whitefish ecotypes. Mol Biol Evol. 21:945-956.
24. Caruso A, Morabito D, Delmotte F, Kahlem G, Carpin S. 2002. Dehydrin induction during drought and osmotic stress in Populus. Plant Physiol Biochem. 40:1033-1042.
25. Cavalli-Sforza LL. 1966. Population structure and human evolution. Proc R Soc Lond B. 164:362-379.
26. Chagné D, Chaumeil P, Ramboer A, et al. (12 co-authors). 2004. Cross-species transferability and mapping of genomic and cDNA SSRs in pines. Theor Appl Genet. 109:1204-1214.
27. Chagné D, Lalanne C, Madur D, et al. (12 co-authors). 2002. A high density linkage map of Pinus pinaster based on AFLPs. Ann For Sci. 59:627-636.
28. Chang S, Puryear JD, Dias MADL, Funkhouser EA, Newton RJ, Cairney J. 1996. Gene expression under water deficit in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda): isolation and characterization of cDNA clones. Physiol Plant. 97:139-148.
29. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B, McVean GA. 2001. Genome sequences and evolutionary biology, a two-way interaction. Trends Ecol Evol. 16(5):235-242.
30. Chaumeil P. 2006. Plasticité moléculaire de deux écotypes de pin maritime soumis à un stress osmotique PhD Thesis. University of Bordeaux-I, Bordeaux, France.
31. Christians JK, Keightley PD. 2002. Genetic architecture: dissecting the genetic basis of phenotypic variation. Curr Biol. 12:415-416.
32. Costa P, Bahrman N, Frigerio JM, Kremer A, Plomion C. 1998. Water-deficit-responsive proteins in maritime pine. Plant Mol Biol. 38:587-596.
33. Cruz RT, Jordan WR, Drew MC. 1992. Structural changes and associated reduction of hydraulic conductance in roots of Sorghum bicolour L. following exposure to water deficit. Plant Physiol. 99:203-212.
34. Derory J, Mariette S, Gonzaléz-Martínez SC, Chagné D, Madur D, Gerber S, Brach J, Persyn F, Ribeiro MM, Plomion C. 2002. What can nuclear microsatellites tell us about maritime pine genetic resources conservation and provenance certification strategies? Ann For Sci. 59:699-708.
35. Destremau DX, Jolly H, Thari T. 1976. Contribution à la connaissance des provenances de Pinus pinaster. Ann Rech For Maroc. 16:101-153.
36. Dubos C, Le Provost G, Pot D, Salin F, Lalane C, Madur D, Frigerio JM, Plomion C. 2003. Identification and characterization of water-stress-responsive genes in hydroponically grown maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) seedlings. Tree Physiol. 23:169-179.
37. Dubos C, Plomion C. 2003. Identification of water-deficit responsive genes in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) roots. Plant Mol Biol. 51:249-262.
38. Dure L III. 1993. Structural motifs in Lea proteins. In: close TJ, Bray EA, editors. Plant responses to cellular dehydration during environmental stress. Vol. 10. Rockville (MD): American Society of Plant Physiologists. p. 91-103.
39. Ehrenreich IM, Purugganan MD. 2006. The molecular genetic basis of plant adaptation. Am J Bot. 93:953-962.
40. Endler JA. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
41. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online. 1:47-50.
42. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT. 1989. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 40:503-537.
43. Fay JC, Wu C-I. 1999. A human population bottleneck is not incompatible with the discordance between patterns of mitochondrial vs. nuclear DNA variation. Mol Biol Evol. 16:1003-1006.
44. Fay JC, Wu C-I. 2000. Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics. 155:1405-1413.
45. Filatov DA. 2002. ProSeq: a software for preparation and evolutionary analysis of DNA sequence data sets. Mol Ecol Notes. 2:621-624.
46. Flint J, Mott R. 2001. Finding the molecular basis of quantitative traits: successes and pitfalls. Nat Rev Genet. 2:437-445.
47. Ford MJ. 2002. Applications of selective neutrality tests to molecular ecology. Mol Ecol. 11:1245-1262.
48. Galtier N, Depaulis F, Barton NH. 2000. Detecting bottlenecks and selective sweeps from DNA sequence polymorphism. Genetics. 155(2):981-987.
49. García-Gil MR, Mikkonen M, Savolainen O. 2003. Nucleotide diversity at two phytochrome loci along a latitudinal cline in Pinus sylvestris. Mol Ecol. 12:1195-1206.
50. Garnier-Géré PH, Ades PK. 2001. Environmental surrogates for predicting and conserving adaptive genetic variability in tree species. Conserv Biol. 15:1632-1644.
51. González-Martínez SC, Alía R, Gil L. 2002. Population genetic structure in a Mediterranean pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.): a comparison of allozyme markers and quantitative traits. Heredity. 89:199-206.
52. González-Martínez SC, Ersoz E, Brown GR, Wheeler NC, Neale DB. 2006. DNA sequence variation and selection of tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms at candidate genes for drought-stress response in Pinus taeda L. Genetics. 172:1915-1926.
53. González-Martínez SC, Gómez A, Carrión JS, Agúndez D, Alía R, Gil L. 2007. Spatial genetic structure of an explicit glacial refugium of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) in southeastern Spain. In: Weiss S, Ferrand N, editors. Phylogeography in southern European refugia: evolutionary perspectives on the origins of European biodiversity. Kluwer Academic Publishers: London. p. 257-269.
54. González-Martínez SC, Krutovsky KV, Neale DB. 2006. Forest-tree population and genomics and adaptive evolution. New Phytol. 170:227-238.
55. González-Martínez SC, Wheeler NC, Rezos E, Nelson CD, Neale DB. 2007. Association genetics in Pinus taeda L.I. wood property traits. Genetics. 175:399-409.
56. Guevara MA, Chagné D, Almeida MH, et al. (16 co-authors). 2005. Isolation and characterization of nuclear microsatellite loci in Pinus pinaster Ait. Mol Ecol Notes. 5:57-59.
57. Haddrill PR, Thornton KR, Charlesworth B, Andolfatto P. 2005. Multilocus pattern of nucleotide variability and the demographic and selection history of Drosophila melanogaster populations. Genome Res. 15:790-799.
58. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X. 2002. SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes. 2:618-620.
59. Hein J, Schierup M, Wiuf C. 2004. Gene genealogies, variation and evolution: a primer in coalescent theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
60. Hellmann I, Ebersberger I, Ptak SE, Pääbo S, Przeworski M. 2003. A neutral explanation for the correlation of diversity with recombination rates in humans. Am J Hum Genet. 72:1527-1535.
61. Heuertz M, De Paoli E, Källman T, Larsson H, Jurman I, Morgante M, Lascoux M, Gyllenstrand N. 2006. Multilocus patterns of nucleotide diversity, linkage disequilibrium and demographic history of norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst]. Genetics. 174:2095-2105.
62. Hoffman EA, Schueler FW, Jones AG, Blouin MS. 2006. An analysis of selection on a colour polymorphism in the northern leopard frog. Mol Ecol. 15:2627-2641.
63. Howe GT, Brunner AM. 2005. An evolving approach for understanding plan adaptation. New Phytol. 167:1-5.
64. Huey RB, Gilchrist GW, Carlson ML, Berrigan D, Serra L. 2000. Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science. 287:308-309.
65. Hurme P, Repo T, Savolainen O, Pääkkönen T. 1997. Climatic adaptation of bud set and frost hardiness in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Can J For Res. 27:716-723.
66. Ingram J, Bartels D. 1996. The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 47:377-403.
67. Joshi J, Schmid B, Caldeira MC, et al. (18 co-authors). 2001. Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species. Ecol Lett. 4:536-544.
68. Joyce DC, Aspinall D, Edwards GR. 1983. Water deficit and the growth and anatomy of the radish fleshy axis. New Phytol. 93:439-446.
69. Jump AS, Hunt JM, Martinez-Izquierdo JA, Penuelas J. 2006. Natural selection and climate change: temperature-linked spatial and temporal trends in gene frequency in Fagus sylvatica. Mol Ecol. 15:3469-3480.
70. Kado T, Yoshimaru H, Tsumura Y, Tachida H. 2003. DNA variation in a conifer, Cryptomeria japonica (Cupressaceae sensu lato). Genetics. 164:1547-1559.
71. Kawecki TJ, Ebert D. 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol Lett. 7:1225-1241.
72. Kittelson PM, Maron JL. 2001. Fine-scale genetically based differentiation of life-history traits in the perennial shrub lupinus arboreus. Evolution. 55:2429-2438.
73. Krutovsky KV, Neale DB. 2005. Nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium in cold-hardiness- and wood quality-related candidate genes in Douglas fir. Genetics. 171:2029-2041.
74. Latta RG. 2003. Gene flow, adaptive population divergence and comparative population structure across loci. New Phytol. 161:51-58.
75. Laval G, Excoffier L. 2004. SIMCOAL 2.0: a program to simulate genomic diversity over large recombining regions in a subdivided population with a complex history. Bioinformatics. 20:2485-2487.
76. Le Corre V, Kremer A. 2003. Comparison of genetic variability at neutral markers, QTLs and adaptive trait in a subdivided population: effects of selection intensity, variance of local optima and migration. Genetics. 164:1205-1219.
77. Li WH, Graur D. 1991. Fundamentals of molecular evolution. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
78. Linhart YB, Grant MC. 1996. Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 27:237-277.
79. Luikart G, England PR, Tallmon D, Jordan S, Taberlet P. 2003. The power and promise of population genomics: from genotyping to genome typing. Nat Rev Genet. 4:981-994.
80. Mariette S, Chagné D, Decroocq S, Giovanni G, Lalanne C, Madur D, Plomion C. 2001. Microsatellite markers for Pinus pinaster Ait. Ann For Sci. 58:203-206.
81. Mariette S, Le Corre V, Austerlitz F, Kremer A. 2002. Sampling within the genome for measuring within population diversity: trade-offs between markers. Mol Ecol. 11:1145-1156.
82. Masle J, Gilmore SR, Farquhar GD. 2005. The ERECTA gene regulates plant transpiration efficiency in Arabidopsis. Nature. 436:866-870.
83. McGuire W, Hill AV, Allsopp CE, Greenwood BM, Kwiatkowski D. 1994. Variation in the TNF-alpha promoter region associated with susceptibility to cerebral malaria. Nature. 371:508-511.
84. McKay JK, Latta RG. 2002. Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol Evol. 17:285-291.
85. Neale DB, Savolainen O. 2004. Association genetics of complex traits in conifers. Trends Plant Sci. 97:325-330.
86. Nei M. 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
87. Nei M, Kumar S. 2000. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press.
88. Neigel JE. 2002. Is FST obsolete? Conserv Genet. 3:167-173.
89. Nguyen-Queyrens A, Bouchet-Lannat F. 2003. Osmotic adjustment in three-year-old seedlings of five provenances of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) in response to drought. Tree Physiol. 23:397-404.
90. Nielsen R. 2001. Statistical tests of selective neutrality in the age of genomics. Heredity. 86:641-647.
91. Nielsen R. 2005. Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annu Rev Genet. 39:197-218.
92. O'Hagan A, Luce BR. 2003. A primer on Bayesian statistics in health economics and outcomes research. London: Medtap International Inc.
93. Padmanabhan V, Dias DMAL, Newton RJ. 1997. Expression analysis of a gene family in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) induced by water deficit stress. Plant Mol Biol. 35:801-807.
94. Petit RJ, Bahrman N, Baradat PH. 1995. Comparison of genetic differentiation in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) estimated using isozyme, total protein and terpenic loci. Heredity. 75:382-389.
95. Petit RJ, Duminil J, Fineschi S, Hampe A, Salvini D, Vendramin GG. 2005. Comparative organization of chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear diversity in plant populations. Mol Ecol. 14:689-701.
96. Plomion C, Bahrman N, Durel CE, O'Malley DM. 1995. Genomic analysis in Pinus pinaster (Maritime pine) using RAPD and protein markers. Heredity. 74:661-668.
97. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 155:945-959.
98. Ramanjalu S, Bartels D. 2002. Drought- and dessication-induced modulation of gene expression in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 25:141-151.
99. Rehfeldt GE, Ying CC, Spittlehouse DL, Hamilton DA Jr. 1999. Genetic responses to climate in Pinus contorta: niche breadth, climate change and reforestation. Ecol Monogr. 69:375-407.
100. Richard S, Morency MJ, Drevet C, Jouanin L, Séguin A. 2000. Isolation and characterization of a dehydrin gene from white spruce induced upon wounding, drought and cold stresses. Plant Mol Biol. 43:1-10.
101. Rodriguez PL. 1998. Protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C) function in higher plants. Plant Mol Biol. 38:919-927.
102. Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R. 2003. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics. 19:2496-2497.
103. Rueffler C, Van Dooren TJM, Leimar O, Abrams PA. 2006. Disruptive selection then what? Trends Ecol Evol. 21(5):238-245.
104. Sabeti PC, Schaffner SF, Fry B, Lohmueller J, Varilly P, Shamovsky O, Palma A, Mikkelsen TS, Altshuler D, Lander ES. 2006. Positive natural selection in the human lineage. Science. 12:1614-1620.
105. Salvador L, Alía R, Agúndez D, Gil L. 2000. Genetic variation and migration pathways of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait) in the Iberian peninsula. Theor Appl Genet. 100:89-95.
106. Savolainen O, Pyhäjärvi T. 2007. Genomic diversity in forest trees. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 10:1-6.
107. Schaal BA, Olsen KM. 2000. Gene genealogies and population variation in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:7024-7029.
108. Schemske DW. 1984. Population structure and local selection in Impatiens pallida (Balsaminaceae), a selfing annual. Evolution. 38:817-832.
109. Schlötterer C. 2002a. Towards a molecular characterization of adaptation in local populations. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 12:683-687.
110. Schlötterer C. 2002b. A microsatellite-based multilocus screen for the identification of local selective sweeps. Genetics. 160:753-763.
111. Scotti-Saintagne C, Mariette S, Porth I, Goicoechea PG, Barreneche T, Bodénès C, Burg K, Kremer A. 2004. Genome scanning for interspecific differentiation between two closely related oak species [Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.]. Genetics. 168:1615-1626.
112. Seki M, Narusaka M, Abe H, Kasuga M, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Carninci P, Hayashizaki Y, Shinozaki K. 2001. Monitoring the expression pattern of 1300 Arabidopsis genes under drought and cold stresses by using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant Cell. 13:61-72.
113. Seki M, Umezawa T, Urano K, Shinozaki K. 2007. Regulatory metabolic networks in drought stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 10:296-302.
114. Shabalina SA, Ogurtsov AY, Kondrashov VA, Kondrashov AS. 2001. Selective constraint in intergenic regions of human and mouse genomes. Trends Genet. 17:373-376.
115. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. 2000. Molecular responses to dehydration and low temperature: differences and cross-talk between two stress signalling pathways. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 3:217-233.
116. Shoemaker J, Painter I, Weir BS. 1999. Bayesian statistics in genetics. Trends Genet. 15:354-358.
117. Slate J. 2005. Quantitative trait locus mapping in natural populations: progress, caveats and future directions. Mol Ecol. 14:363-379.
118. Société Centrale pour l'Equipement du Territoire- Tunisie. 2005. Integrated management for water resources in the North of Tunisia. Final Report for the Tunisian Republic agriculture and hydraulic resources ministry.
119. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry. 3rd ed. San Francisco (CA): Freeman.
120. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. 2003. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:9440-9445.
121. Storz JF. 2002. Contrasting patterns of divergence in quantitative traits and neutral DNA markers: analysis of clinal variation. Mol Ecol. 11:2537-2551.
122. Storz JF. 2005. Using genome scans of DNA polymorphism to infer adaptive population divergence. Mol Ecol. 14:671-688.
123. Street NR, Skogstrom O, Tucker J, Rodriguez-Acosta M, Nilsson P, Jansson S, Taylor G. 2006. The genetics and genomics of the drought response in Populus. Plant J. 48:321-341.
124. Tabor HK, Risch NJ, Myers RM. 2002. Opinion: candidate-gene approaches for studying complex genetic traits: practical considerations. Nat Rev Genet. 3:391-397.
125. Tajima F. 1983. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics. 105:437-460.
126. Tajima F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 123:585-595.
127. Thomas CD. 2005. Recent evolutionary effects of climate change. In: Lovejoy TE, Hannah L, editors. Climate change and biodiversity. New Haven (Connecticut): Yale University Press. p. 75-88.
128. Thompson AJ, Corlett JE. 1995. mRNA levels of four tomato (L. esculentum Mill L.) genes related to fluctuating soil water status. Plant Cell Environ. 18:773-780.
129. Vasemägi A, Nilsson J, Primmer CR. 2005. Expressed sequence tag-linked microsatellites as a source of gene-associated polymorphisms for detecting signatures of divergent selection in atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L). Mol Biol Evol. 22:1067-1076.
130. Vasemägi A, Primmer CR. 2005. Challenges for identifying functionally important genetic variation: the promise of combining complementary research strategies. Mol Ecol. 14:3623-3642.
131. Verhoeven KJF, Simonsen KL, McIntyre LM. 2005. Implementing false discovery rate control: increasing your power. Oikos. 108:643-647.
132. Wahid N, González-Martínez SC, El Hadrami I, Boulli A. 2004. Genetic structure and variability of natural populations of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) in Morocco. Silvae Genet. 53:93-99.
133. Waldmann P, García-Gil MR, Sillanpää MJ. 2005. Comparing Bayesian estimates of genetic differentiation of molecular markers and quantitative traits: an application to Pinus sylvestris. Heredity. 94:623-629.
134. Wang R-L, Stec A, Hey J, Lukens L, Doebley J. 1999. The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature. 398:236-239.
135. Watkinson JI, Sioson AA, Vasquez-Robinet C, et al. (14 coauthors). 2003. Photosynthetic acclimation is reflected in specific patterns of gene expression in drought-stressed loblolly pine. Plant Physiol. 133:1702-1716.
136. Watterson GA. 1975. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 7:256-276.
137. Weir BS, Cockerham CC. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution. 38:1358-1370.
138. Wilding CS, Butlin RK, Grahame J. 2001. Differential gene exchange between parapatric morphs of Littorina saxatilis detected using AFLP markers. J Evol Biol. 14:611-619.
139. Wright SI, Gaut BS. 2005. Molecular population genetics and the search for adaptive evolution in plants. Mol Biol Evol. 22:506-519.
140. Yang S-H, Wang H, Sathyan P, Stasolla C, Loopstra CA. 2005. Real-time RT-PCR analysis of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) arabinogalactan-protein-like genes. Physiol Plant. 124:91-106.
141. Zhang YI, Sederoff RR, Allona I. 2000. Differential expression of genes encoding cell wall proteins in vascular tissues from vertical and bent loblolly pine trees. Tree Physiol. 20:457-466.