Disruptive selection and then what?

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 238-245

  Rueffler, Claus ^a,b   Van Dooren, Tom J M ^b   Leimar, Olof ^c   Abrams, Peter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; SPECIES CONCEPT;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; PHENOTYPE; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; EVOLUTION; GENETIC VARIATION; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION (GENETICS); SELECTION, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 33646378875     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.003     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Levene H. Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Am. Nat. 87 (1953) 331-333
2. Mather K. Polymorphism as an outcome of disruptive selection. Evolution 9 (1955) 52-61
3. Maynard Smith J. Disruptive selection, polymorphism and sympatric speciation. Nature 195 (1962) 60-62
4. Bradshaw A.D. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv. Genet. 13 (1965) 115-155
5. Levins R. Evolution in Changing Environments (1968), Princeton University Press
6. Wright, S. (1969) Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. 2: The Theory of Gene Frequencies, University of Chicago Press
7. Dickinson H., and Antonovics J. Theoretical considerations of sympatric divergence. Am. Nat. 107 (1973) 256-274
8. Wilson D.S., and Turelli M. Stable underdominance and the evolutionary invasion of empty niches. Am. Nat. 127 (1986) 835-861
9. Christiansen F.B. On conditions for evolutionary stability for a continuously varying character. Am. Nat. 138 (1991) 37-50
10. Abrams P.A., et al. Evolutionarily unstable fitness maxima and stable fitness minima of continuous traits. Evol. Ecol. 7 (1993) 465-487
11. Metz J.A.J., et al. Adaptive dynamics: a geometrical study of the consequences of nearly faithful reproduction. In: Van Strien S.J., and Verduyn Lunel S.M. (Eds). Stochastic and Spatial Structures of Dynamical Systems (1996), KNAW 183-231
12. Geritz S.A.H., et al. Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. 12 (1998) 35-57
13. Dieckmann U., and Doebeli M. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400 (1999) 354-357
14. Bürger R., and Gimelfarb A. The effects of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection on a polygenic trait. Genetics 167 (2004) 1425-1443
15. Doebeli M., and Dieckmann U. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. Am. Nat. 156 (2000) S77-S101
16. Bolnick D.I. Can intraspecific competition drive disruptive selection? An experimental test in natural populations of sticklebacks. Evolution 58 (2004) 608-618
17. Hori M. Frequency-dependent natural selection in the handedness of scale-eating fish. Science 260 (1993) 216-219
18. Benkman C.W. Are the bill crossing morphs in crossbills the result of frequency-dependent selection?. Evol. Ecol. 10 (1996) 119-126
19. Schluter D. Frequency dependent natural selection during character displacement in sticklebacks. Evolution 57 (2003) 1142-1150
20. Swanson B.O., et al. Trophic polymorphism and behavioral differences decrease intraspecific competition in a cichlid, Herichthys minckleyi. Ecology 84 (2003) 1441-1446
21. Kisdi E., and Geritz S.A.H. Adaptive dynamics in allele space: evolution of genetic polymorphism by small mutations in a heterogeneous environment. Evolution 53 (1999) 993-1008
22. Waxman D., and Gavrilets S. 20 questions about adaptive dynamics. J. Evol. Biol. 18 (2005) 1139-1154
23. Coyne J.A., and Orr A.H. Speciation (2004), Sinauer
24. Dieckmann, U. et al., eds (2004) Adaptive Speciation, Cambridge University Press
25. Gavrilets S. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species (2004), Princeton University Press
26. Bulmer M.G. The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics (1980), Clarendon Press
27. Spichtig M., and Kawecki T.J. The maintenance (or not) of polygenic variation by soft selection in heterogeneous environments. Am. Nat. 164 (2004) 70-84
28. Bürger R. A multilocus analysis of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection on a quantitative trait. J. Math. Biol. 50 (2005) 355-396
29. Feldman M.W., et al. Population genetic perspectives on the evolution of recombination. Annu. Rev. Genet. 30 (1997) 261-295
30. Clarke B. Frequency-dependent selection for the dominance of rare polymorphic genes. Evolution 18 (1964) 364-369
31. O'Donald P. Models of the evolution of dominance. Proc. R. Soc. B 171 (1968) 127-143
32. Van Dooren T.J.M. The evolutionary ecology of dominance-recessivity. J. Theor. Biol. 198 (1999) 519-532
33. Smith T.B. Disruptive selection and the genetic basis of bill size polymorphism in the African finch Pyrenestes. Nature 363 (1993) 618-620
34. Kondrashov A.S., and Kondrashov F.A. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400 (1999) 351-354
35. Geritz S.A.H., and Kisdi E. Adaptive dynamics in diploid, sexual populations and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Proc. R. Soc. B 267 (2000) 1671-1678
36. Van Doorn G.S., and Weissing F.J. Ecological versus sexual selection models of sympatric speciation: a synthesis. Selection 1-2 (2001) 17-40
37. Gavrilets S. Models of speciation: what have we learned in 40 years?. Evolution 57 (2003) 2197-2215
38. Bolnick D.I. Waiting for sympatric speciation. Evolution 58 (2004) 895-899
39. Doebeli M., et al. What we have also learned: adaptive speciation is theoretically plausible. Evolution 59 (2005) 691-695
40. Felsenstein J. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals?. Evolution 35 (1981) 124-138
41. Kirkpatrick M., and Ravigné V. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 159 (2002) S22-S35
42. Balkau B., and Feldman M.W. Selection for migration modification. Genetics 74 (1973) 171-174
43. Maynard Smith J. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100 (1966) 637-650
44. Feder J.L. The apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella: flies in the face of conventional wisdom about speciation?. In: Howard D.J., and Berlocher S.H. (Eds). Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (1998), Oxford University Press 130-144
45. Bolnick D.I., et al. The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am. Nat. 161 (2003) 1-28
46. Slatkin M. Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38 (1984) 622-630
47. Bolnick D.I., and Doebeli M. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution 57 (2003) 2433-2449
48. Van Dooren T.J.M., et al. Sexual dimorphism or evolutionary branching?. Evol. Ecol. Res. 6 (2004) 857-871
49. Temeles E.J., et al. Evidence for ecological causation of sexual dimorphism in a hummingbird. Science 289 (2000) 441-443
50. Duedley S.E. The functional ecology of phenotypic plasticity in plants. In: DeWitt T.J., and Scheiner S.M. (Eds). Phenotypic Plasticity (2004), Oxford University Press 151-172
51. Schlichting C.D., and Pigliucci M. Phenotypic Evolution (1998), Sinauer
52. West-Eberhard M.J. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution (2003), Oxford University Press
53. Berrigan D., and Scheiner S.M. Modeling the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. In: DeWitt T.J., and Scheiner S.M. (Eds). Phenotypic Plasticity (2004), Oxford University Press 82-97
54. Leimar, O. et al. (2006) A new perspective on developmental plasticity and the principles of adaptive morph determination. Am. Nat. 167, doi:10.1086/499566
55. Seger J., and Brockmann H.J. What is bet-hedging?. In: Harvey P., and Partridge L. (Eds). Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 4 (1987), Oxford University Press 182-211
56. Leimar O. The evolution of phenotypic polymorphism: randomized strategies versus evolutionary branching. Am. Nat. 165 (2005) 669-681
57. Shapiro A.M. Seasonal polyphenism. Evol. Biol. 9 (1976) 259-333
58. Ackermann M., and Doebeli M. Evolution of niche width and adaptive diversification. Evolution 58 (2004) 2599-2612
59. Bolnick D.I. Intraspecific competition favors niche width expansion in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 410 (2001) 463-466
60. Werner T.K., and Sherry T.W. Behavioral feeding specialization in Pinaroloxias inornata, the 'Darwin's Finch' of Cocos Island, Costa Rica. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84 (1986) 5506-5510
61. Sol D., et al. Big brains, enhanced cognition, and the response of birds to novel environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 5460-5465
62. Gislason D., et al. Rapid and coupled phenotypic differentiation in Icelandic Artic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56 (1999) 2229-2234
63. Schliewen U.K., et al. Sympatric speciation suggested by monophyly of crater lake cichlids. Nature 368 (1994) 629-632
64. Abrams, P.A. and Matsuda, H. (1996) Fitness minimization and dynamic instability as a consequence of predator-prey coevolution. Evol. Ecol. 10, 167-186 (reprinted with corrections, 1997. Evol. Ecol. 11, 1-20)
65. Marrow P., et al. Evolutionary dynamics of predator-prey systems; an ecological perspective. J. Math. Biol. 34 (1996) 556-578
66. Nuismer S.L., and Doebeli M. Genetic correlations and the coevolutionary dynamics of three-species systems. Evolution 58 (2004) 1165-1177
67. Skulason S., and Smith T.B. Resource polymorphisms in vertebrates. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10 (1995) 366-370
68. Proulx R., and Magnan P. Contribution of plasticity and heredity to the trophic polymorphism of lacustrine brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis M.). Evol. Ecol. Res. 6 (2004) 503-522
69. Rundle H.D., and Schluter D. Natural selection and ecological speciation in sticklebacks. In: Dieckmann U., et al. (Ed). Adaptive Speciation (2004), Cambridge University Press 192-209
70. Schluter D., and McPhail J.D. Ecological character displacement and speciation in sticklebacks. Am. Nat. 140 (1992) 85-108
71. Benkman C.W., and Lindholm A.K. The advantage and evolution of a morphological novelty. Nature 349 (1991) 519-520
72. Edelaar P., et al. No support for a genetic basis of mandible crossing direction in crossbills (Loxia spp.). Auk 122 (2005) 1123-1139