Population genetic structure in a Mediterranean pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.): A comparison of allozyme markers and quantitative traits

Heredity

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 199-206

  Gonzalez Martinez S C ^a   Alia R ^a   Gil, L ^a  

^a ETSIM   (Spain)

Author keywords

Allozymes; F statistics; Pinus; Selection; South western Europe

Indexed keywords

ALLOZYME; GENETIC STRUCTURE; POPULATION GENETICS; TREE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ENZYMES; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETICS, POPULATION; PINUS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE;

EUROPE;

EMBRYOPHYTA; PINUS PINASTER;

EID: 0036382081     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800114     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alía R, Gil L, Pardos JA (1995). Performance of 43 Pinus pinaster provenances on 5 locations in Central Spain. Silvae Genet 44: 75-81.
2. Alía R, Moro J, Denis JB (1997). Performance of Pinus pinaster provenances in Spain: interpretation of the genotype by environment interaction. Can J For Res 27: 1548-1559.
3. Alía R, Gómez A, Agúndez D, Notivol E, Bueno MA (2001). Levels of genetic differentiation in Pinus halepensis Mill. using quantitative traits, isozymes, RAPDs and Cp-microsatellites. In: Müller-Starck G, Schubert R (eds) Genetic Response of Forest Systems to Changing Environmental Conditions, Kluwer Academic Press: Dordrecht, Boston, London. pp 151-160.
4. Baradat Ph, Marpeau A (1988). Le Pin maritime, Pinus pinaster. Biologie et génétique des terpènes pour la conaissance et l'amélioration de l'espèce. PhD Thesis. University of Bordeaux I.
5. Bastien C, Alía R (2000). What might be useful measures of genetic variability for adaptive traits within populations of Scots pine? Invest Agr: Sist Recur For Fuera de Serie 1: 97-110.
6. Bonnin I, Prosperi JM, Olivieri I (1996). Genetic markers and quantitative genetic variation in Medicago truncatula (Leguminosae): a comparative analysis of population structure. Genetics 143: 1795-1805.
7. Bossart JL, Scriber JM (1995). Maintenance of ecologically significant genetic variation in the tiger swallowtail butterfly through differential selection and gene flow. Evolution 49: 1163-1171.
8. Burban Ch, Petit RJ, Carcreff E, Jactel H (1999). Rangewide variation of the maritime pine bast scale Matsococcus feytaudi Duc. (Homoptera: Matsucoccidae) in relation to genetic structure of its host. Mol Ecol 8: 1593-1602.
9. Charlesworth B (1998). Measures of divergence between populations and the effect of forces that reduce variability. Mol Biol Evol 15: 538-543.
10. Charlesworth B, Nordborg M, Charlesworth D (1997). The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Genet Res 70: 155-174.
11. Costa P, Durel CE (1996). Time trends in genetic control over height and diameter in maritime pine. Can J For Res 26: 1209-1217.
12. Durel CE, Bertin P, Kremer A (1996). Relationship between depression and inbreeding coefficient in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster). Theor Appl Genet 92: 347-356.
13. González-Martínez SC, Salvador L, Agúndez D, Alía R, Gil L (2001). Geographical variation of gene diversity of Pinus pinaster Ait. in the Iberian Peninsula. In: Müller-Starck G, Schubert R (eds) Genetic Response of Forest Systems to Changing Environmental Conditions, Kluwer Academic Press: Dordrecht, Boston, London. pp 161-171.
14. Guyon JP, Kremer A (1982). Stabilité phénotipique de la croissance en hauteur et cinétique journalière de la pression de sève et de la transpiration chez le Pin maritime (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Can J For Res 12: 936-946.
15. Harfouche A, Baradat Ph, Durel CE (1995). Variabilité intraspécifique chez le pin maritime (Pinus pinaster Ait.) dans le sud-est de la France. I. Variabilité des populatons autochnotnes et des populations de l'ensemble de l'aire de l'espèce. Ann Sci For 52: 307-328.
16. Kremer A, Roussel G (1986). Décomposition de la croissance en hauteur du pine maritime (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Variabilité géographique des composantes morphogénétiques et phénologiques. Ann Sci For 43: 15-34.
17. Kremer A, Zanetto A, Ducousso A (1997). Multilocus and multitrait measures of differentiation for gene markers and phenotypic traits. Genetics 145: 1229-1241.
18. Kuittinen H, Mattila A, Savolainen O (1997). Genetic variation at marker loci in quantitative traits in natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 79: 144-152.
19. Kusnandar D, Galwey NW, Hertzler GL, Butcher TB (1998). Age trends in variances and heritabilities for diameter and height in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in Western Australia. Silvae Genet 47: 136-141.
20. Lagerkrantz U, Ryman N (1990). Genetic structure of Norway Spruce (Picea abies): concordance of morphological and allozymic variation. Evolution 44: 38-53.
21. Lande R (1982). A quantitative genetic theory of life history evolution. Ecology 63: 607-615.
22. Lascoux M, Thorsen J, Gullberg U (1996). Population structure in a riparian willow species, Salix viminalis L. Genet Res Camb 68: 45-54.
23. Long AD, Singh RS (1995). Molecules versus morphology: The detection of selection acting on morphological characters along a cline in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 74: 569-581.
24. Lynch M (1995). A quantitative-genetic perspective on conservation issues. In: Avise JC, Hamrick JL (eds) Conservation Genetics: case histories from nature, Chapman & Hall: New York. pp 471-501.
25. Lynch M, Pfrender M, Spitze K, Lehman N, Hicks J, Allen D et al (1999). The quantitative and molecular genetic architecture of a subdivided species. Evolution 53: 100-110.
26. Manly BFJ (1997). Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. Chapman & Hall: London.
27. Marshall DR, Brown AHD (1975). Optimum sampling strategies in genetic conservation. In: Frankel OH, Hawkes JG (eds) Plant Genetics Resources for Today and Tomorrow, University Press: Cambridge. pp 53-80.
28. Matziris DJ (1982). Variation in growth and quality characters in Pinus pinaster provenances grown at seven sites in Greece. Silvae Genet 31: 168-173.
29. Nei M (1987). Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press: New York.
30. Petit RJ, Bahrman N, Baradat Ph (1995). Comparison of genetic differentiation in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) estimated using isozyme, total protein and terpenic loci. Heredity 75: 382-389.
31. Petit RJ, El-Mousadik A, Pons O (1998). Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conserv Biol 12: 844-855.
32. Petit C, Fréville H, Mignot A, Colas B, Riba M, Imbert E et al (2000). Gene flow and local adaptation in two endemic plant species. Biol Cons 100: 21-34.
33. ST between allozymes and morphological traits. Genetics 140: 733-744.
34. Prout T, Barker JSF (1993). F Statistics in Drosophila buzzatii: selection, population size and inbreeding. Genetics 134: 369-375.
35. Ribeiro MM, Plomion C, Petit RJ, Vendramin GG, Szmidt AE (2001). Variation in chloroplast single-sequence repeats in Portuguese maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Theor Appl Genet 102: 97-103.
36. Ritland K (2000). Marker-inferred relatedness as a tool for detecting heritability in nature. Mol Ecol 9: 1195-1204.
37. Salvador L (1997). Estudio de la variabilidad genética de Pinus pinaster en España usando marcadores proteicos e isoenzimáticos. Ph.D. Thesis. Polytechnic University of Madrid.
38. Salvador L, Alía R, Agúndez D, Gil L (2000). Genetic variation and migration pathways of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in the Iberian Peninsula. Theor Appl Genet 100: 89-95.
39. Schemske DW, Lande R (1985). The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations. Evolution 39: 41-52.
40. Sierra-de-Grado R, Moulia B, Fournier M, Alía R, Díez-Barra R (1997). Genetic control of stem form in Pinus pinaster Ait. seedlings exposed to lateral light. Trees 11: 455-461.
41. Spitze K (1993). Population structure in Daphnia obtusa: Quantitative genetic and allozymic variation. Genetics 135: 357-374.
42. Vendramin GG, Anzidei M, Madaghiele A, Bucci G (1998). Distribution of genetic diversity in Pinus pinaster Ait. as revealed by chloroplast microsatellites. Theor Appl Genet 97: 456-463.
43. Waldmann P, Andersson S (1998). Comparison of quantitative genetic variation and allozyme diversity within and between populations of Scabiosa canescens and S. columbaria. Heredity 81: 79-86.
44. Weir BS (1990). Genetic Data Analysis. Sinauer: Sunderland.
45. ST. Genetics 142: 1045-1052.