Comparing Bayesian estimates of genetic differentiation of molecular markers and quantitative traits: An application to Pinus sylvestris

Heredity

Volumn 94, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 623-629

  Waldmann, P ^a,c   Garcia Gil M R ^b,c   Sillanpaa M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^c SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Fst; Genetic drift; MCMC; Population structure; Qst; Scots pine; Selection

Indexed keywords

GENETIC VARIATION;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; POPULATION GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; SCOTS PINE;

BAYES THEOREM; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, GENETIC; PINUS SYLVESTRIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; VARIATION (GENETICS);

PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 20444480694     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800672     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Avise JC (1993). Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA.
2. Balding DJ (2003). Likelihood-based inference for genetic correlation coefficients. Theor Popul Biol 63: 221-230.
3. Balloux F, Brünner H, Lugon-Moulin N, Hausser J, Goudet J (2000). Microsatellites can be misleading: an empirical and simulation study. Evolution 54: 1414-1422.
4. Barton NH, Keightley PD (2002). Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nat Rev Genet 3: 11-21.
5. Beaumont MA, Rannala B (2004). The Bayesian revolution in genetics. Nat Rev Genet 5: 251-261.
6. Corander J, Waldmann P, Marttinen P, Sillanpää MJ (2004). BAPS 2: enhanced possibilities for the analysis of genetic population structure. Bioinformatics 20: 2363-2369.
7. Corander J, Waldmann P, Sillanpää MJ (2003). Bayesian analysis of genetic differentiation between populations. Genetics 163: 367-374.
8. De Boer IJM, Hoeschele I (1993). Genetic evaluation methods for populations with dominance and inbreeding. Theor Appl Genet 86: 245-258.
9. Elsik CG, Minihan VT, Hall SE, Scarpa AM, Williams CG (2000). Low-copy microsatellite markers for Pinus taeda L. Genome 43: 550-555.
10. Excoffier L (2001). Analysis of population subdivision. In: Balding DJ, Bishop M, Cannings C (eds) Handbook of Statistical Genetics. Wiley: NY. pp 271-307.
11. Fu R, Gelfand AE, Holsinger KE (2003). Exact moment calculations for genetic models with migration, mutation, and drift. Theor Popul Biol 63: 231-243.
12. García-Gil MR, Mikkonen M, Savolainen O (2003). Nucleotide diversity at two phytochrome loci along a latitudinal cline in Pinus sylvestris. Mol Ecol 12: 1195-1206.
13. Gelfand AE, Sahu SK, Carlin BP (1995). Efficient parametrizations for normal linear mixed models. Biometrika 82: 479-488.
14. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2004). Bayesian Data Analysis 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall: London.
15. Goldstein DB, Schlötterer C (1999). Microsatellites: Evolution and Applications. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
16. Gonzalez-Martínez SC, Alia R, Gil L (2002). Population genetic structure in a Mediterranean pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.): a comparison of allozyme markers and quantitative traits. Heredity 89: 199-206.
17. Holsinger KE (1999). Analysis of genetic diversity in geographically structured populations: a Bayesian perspective. Hereditas 130: 245-255.
18. Holsinger KE, Lewis PO (2003) Hickory. Ver. 1.0. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, CT. Available via http://www.eeb.uconn.edu/.
19. Jaramillo-Correa JP, Beaulieu J, Bousquet J (2001). Contrasting evolutionary forces driving populations structure at expressed sequence tag polymorphisms, allozymes and quantitative traits in white spruce. Mol Ecol 10: 2729-2740.
20. Karhu A, Hurme P, Karjalainen M, Karvonen P, Karkkainen K, Neale D et al (1996). Do molecular markers reflect patterns of differentiation in adaptive traits of conifers? Theor Appl Genet 93: 215-221.
21. Lande R (1992). Neutral theory of quantitative genetic variance in an island model with local extinction and colonization. Evolution 46: 381-389.
22. Latta RG (1998). Differentiation of allelic frequencies at quantitative trait loci affecting locally adaptive traits. Am Nat 151: 283-292.
23. Le Corre V, Kremer A (2003). Genetic variability at neutral markers, quantitative trait loci and trait in a subdivided population under selection. Genetics 164: 1205-1219.
24. Lopez-Fanjul C, Fernandez A, Toro MA (2003). The effect of neutral nonadditive gene action on the quantitative index of population divergence. Genetics 164: 1627-1633.
25. Lynch M (1994). The neutral theory of phenotypic evolution. In: Real L (ed) Ecological Genetics. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ. pp 85-108.
26. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998). Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA.
27. McKay JK, Latta RC (2002). Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL, and traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 285-291.
28. Merilä J, Crnokrak P (2001). Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. J Evol Biol 14: 892-903.
29. Muona O, Harju A (1989). Effective population sizes, genetic variability, and mating system in natural stands and seed orchards of Pinus sylvestris. Silvae Genetica 38: 221-228.
30. Palo JU, O'Hara RB, Laugen AT, Laurila A, Primmer CR, Merilä J (2003). Latitudinal divergence of common frog (Rana temporaria) life history traits by natural selection: evidence from a comparison of molecular and quantitative genetic data. Mol Ecol 12: 1963-1978.
31. Petit C, Freville H, Mignot A, Colas B, Riba M, Imbert E et al. (2001). Gene flow and local adaptation in two endemic plant species. Biol Cons 100: 21-34.
32. Pinheiro J, Bates DM (2000). Mixed Effects Models in S and S-Plus. Springer-Verlag: New York.
33. Podolsky RH, Holtsford TP (1995). Population structure of morphological traits in Clarkia dudleyana. I. Comparison of FST between allozymes and morphological traits. Genetics 140: 733-744.
34. Prout T, Barker JSF (1989). Ecological aspects of the heritability of body size in Drosophila buzzatii. Genetics 123: 803-813.
35. Reed DH, Frankham R (2001). How closely related are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? A meta-analysis. Evolution 55: 1095-1103.
36. Robert CP (2001). The Bayesian Choice. Springer-Verlag: New York 2nd edn.
37. Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D (2003) Win-BUGS. Ver. 1.4 user manual. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, U.K. Available via http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs.
38. Spitze K (1993). Population structure in Daphnia obtusa: quantitative genetic and allozyme variation. Genetics 135: 367-374.
39. Waldmann P, Andersson S (1998). Comparison of quantitative genetic variation and allozyme diversity within and between populations of Scabiosa canescens and S. columbria. Heredity 81: 79-86.
40. Weir BS, Hill WG (2002). Estimating F-statistics. Ann Rev Genet 36: 721-750.
41. Whitlock MC (1999). Neutral additive genetic variance in a meta-population. Genet Res 74: 215-221.
42. Widen B, Andersson S, Rao G-Y, Widen M (2002). Population divergence of genetic (co)variance matrices in a subdivided plant species, Brassica cretica. J Evol Biol 15: 961-970.
43. ST. Theor Popul Biol 66: 185-197.
44. Wright S (1951). The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugen 15: 323-354.
45. Wright S (1965). The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to system mating. Evolution 19: 395-420.
46. Yang RC, Yeh FC, Yanchuck AD (1996). A comparison of isozyme and quantitative genetic variation in Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia by Fst. Genetics 142: 1045-1052.