Interpretation of magnetic data using tilt-angle derivatives

Geophysics

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Salem, Ahmed ^a   Williams, Simon ^a   Fairhead, Derek ^a,b   Smith, Richard ^c   Ravat, Dhananjay ^d  

^a Kitson House   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c Fugro Airborne Surveys Canada   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EULER EQUATIONS; GEOPHYSICS; LINEAR EQUATIONS;

HORIZONTAL LOCATION; MAGNETIC ANOMALY; MAGNETIC BODIES; MAGNETIC DATA; MAGNETIC SOURCES; TILT-ANGLE DERIVATIVES;

GEOMAGNETISM;

DATA INTERPRETATION; EULERIAN ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC ANOMALY; NUMERICAL MODEL; SIMULATION; TILT; WAVE MODELING;

AFRICA; NAMIBIA; SOUTHERN AFRICA; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA;

EID: 38149058968     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.2799992     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Blakely, R. J., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications: Cambridge University Press.
2. Blakely, R. J., and R. W. Simpson, 1986, Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies: Geophysics, 51, 1494-1498. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1442197
3. Cooper, G. R. J., and D. R. Cowan, 2006, Enhancing potential field data using filters based on the local phase: Computers and Geosciences, 32, 1585-1591. cgo CGEODT 0098-3004 10.1016/j.cageo.2006.02.016
4. Fedi, M., 2007, DEXP: A fast method to determine the depth and the structural index of potential fields sources: Geophysics, 72, no. 1, I1-I11. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.2399452
5. Fairhead, J. D., S. E. Williams, and G. Flanagan, 2004, Testing magnetic local wavenumber depth estimation methods using a complex 3D test model: 74th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 742-745.
6. FitzGerald, D., A. Reid, and P. Mclnerney, 2004, New discrimination techniques for Euler deconvolution: Computer and Geoscience, 30, 461-469. cgo CGEODT 0098-3004 10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.006
7. Miller, H. G., and V. Singh, 1994, Potential field tilt - A new concept for location of potential field sources: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 32, 213-217. c4u JAGPEA 0926-9851 10.1016/0926-9851(94)90022-1
8. Nabighian, M. N., V. J. S. Grauch, R. O. Hansen, T. R. LaFehr, Y. Li, J. W. Peirce, J. D. Phillips, and M. E. Ruder, 2005, The historical development of the magnetic method in exploration: Geophysics, 70, no. 6, 33ND-61ND. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.2133784
9. Nabighian, M. N., and R. O. Hansen, 2001, Unification of Euler and Werner deconvolution in three dimensions via the generalized Hilbert transform: Geophysics, 66, 1805-1810. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1487122
10. Ravat, D., 1996, Analysis of the Euler method and its applicability in environmental magnetic investigations: Journal of Environmental Engineering Geophysics, 1, 229-238. c8e ZZZZZZ 1083-1363
11. Reid, A. B., J. M. Allsop, H. Granser, A. J. Millet, and I. W. Somerton, 1990, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution: Geophysics, 55, 80-91. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1442774
12. Reid, A. B., D. Fitzgerald, and G. Flanagan, 2005, Hybrid Euler magnetic basement depth estimation: Bishop 3D tests: 75th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 671-673.
13. Salem, A., and D. Ravat, 2003, A combined analytic signal and Euler method (AN-EUL) for automatic interpretation of magnetic data: Geophysics, 68, 1952-1961. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033
14. Salem, A., D. Ravat, R. Smith, and K. Ushijima, 2005, Interpretation of magnetic data using an enhanced local wavenumber (ELW) method: Geophysics, 70, no. 2, L7-L12. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1884828
15. Smith, R. S., and A. Salem, 2005, Imaging the depth, structure, and susceptibility from magnetic data: The advanced source parameter imaging method: Geophysics, 70, no. 4, L31-38. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033
16. Smith, R. S., A. Salem, and J. Lemieux, 2005, An enhanced method for source parameter imaging of magnetic data collected for mineral exploration: Geophysical Prospecting, 53, 655-665. 8uc GPPRAR 0016-8025 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00494.x
17. Smith, R. S., J. B. Thurston, T. F. Dai, and I. N. MacLeod, 1998, iSPI™ - the improved source parameter imaging method: Geophysical Prospecting, 46, 141-151. 8uc GPPRAR 0016-8025
18. Stavrev, P., and A. Reid, 2007, Degrees of homogeneity of potential fields and structural indices of Euler deconvolution: Geophysics, 72, no. 1, L1-L12. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.2400010
19. Thompson, D. T., 1982, EULDPH: A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data: Geophysics, 47, 31-37. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1441278
20. Thurston, J. B., and R. S. Smith, 1997, Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, susceptibility contrast using the SPI™ method: Geophysics, 62, 807-813. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1444190
21. Thurston, J. B., R. S. Smith, and J. C. Guillon, 2002, A multimodel method for depth estimation from magnetic data: Geophysics, 67, 555-561. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1468616
22. Verduzco, B., 2003, The interpretation of aeromagnetic data over the Erindi area, Namibia: MSc. thesis, University of Leeds.
23. Verduzco, B., J. D. Fairhead, C. M. Green, and C. MacKenzie, 2004, New insights into magnetic derivatives for structural mapping: The Leading Edge, 23, 116-119. lee LEEDFF 1070-485X 10.1190/1.1651454
24. Williams, S. E., J. D. Fairhead, and G. Flanagan, 2002, Realistic models of basement topography for depth to magnetic basement testing: 72th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 814-817.
25. 2005, Comparison of grid Euler deconvolution with and without 2D constraints using a realistic 3D magnetic basement model: Geophysics, 70, L13-L21. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1925745