Degrees of homogeneity of potential fields and structural indices of Euler deconvolution

Geophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Stavrev, Petar ^a   Reid, Alan ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINING AND GEOLOGY   (Bulgaria)

^b Reid Geophysics   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Deconvolution; Geomagnetism; Gravity

Indexed keywords

CONVOLUTION; GEOMAGNETISM; GRAVITATION; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS;

EULER DECONVOLUTION; POTENTIAL FIELDS; STRUCTURAL INDICES;

GEOPHYSICS;

DECONVOLUTION; EULERIAN ANALYSIS; GEOMAGNETISM; GRAVITY; HOMOGENEITY; POTENTIAL FIELD;

EID: 33846093936     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.2400010     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Blakely, R. J., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications: Cambridge University Press.
2. Courant, R., and F. John, 1965, Introduction to calculus and analysis: Wiley Interscience.
3. Euler, L., 1936, Introduction to the analysis of infinitesimal: ONTI (Russian translation).
4. Euler, L., 1949, Differential calculus: Gostechizdat (Russian translation).
5. Hansen, R. O., and L. Suciu, 2002, Multiple-source Euler deconvolution: Geophysics, 67, 525-535. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1468613
6. Marson, I., and E. E. Klingele, 1993, Advantages of using the vertical gradient of gravity for 3-D interpretation: Geophysics, 58, 1588-1595. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1443374
7. Nabighian, M. N., and R. O. Hansen, 2001, Unification of Euler and Werner deconvolution in three dimensions via the generalized Hilbert transform: Geophysics, 66, 1805-1810. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1487122
8. Reid, A. B., J. M. Allsop, H. Granser, A. J. Millet, and I. W. Somerton, 1990, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution: Geophysics, 55, 80-91. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/ 1.1442774
9. Reid, A. B., D. FitzGerald, and P. McInerny, 2003, Euler deconvolution of gravity data: 73rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 580-583.
10. Stavrev, P., 1997, Euler deconvolution using differential similarity transformations of gravity or magnetic anomalies: Geophysical Prospecting, 45, 207-246. 8uc GPPRAR 0016-8025 10.1046/ j.1365-2478.1997.00331.x
11. Telford, W. M., L. P. Geldart, and R. E. Sheriff, 1990, Applied Geophysics, 2nd ed.: Cambridge University Press.
12. Thompson, D. T., 1982, EULDPH - A new technique for making computer assisted depth estimates from magnetic data: Geophysics, 47, 31-37. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1441278
13. Zhang, Ch., M. F. Mushayandebvu, A. B. Reid, J. R. Fairhead, and M. E. Odegard, 2000, Euler deconvolution of gravity tensor gradient data: Geophysics, 65, 512-520. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 10.1190/1.1444745