Comparison of grid Euler deconvolution with and without 2D constraints using a realistic 3D magnetic basement model

Geophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2005, Pages

  Williams, Simon E ^a   Fairhead, J Derek ^a   Flanagan, Guy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b Phillips Research Center 224GB   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT THEORY; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ESTIMATION; GEOMETRY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; THRESHOLD LOGIC;

GRID EULER DECONVOLUTION; SOURCE-GEOMETRY DISTRIBUTION; SURFACE-EXPOSED FAULTING; THRESHOLD VALUES;

GEOMAGNETISM;

EULERIAN ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC METHOD; MODEL;

EID: 20844459114     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1925745     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barbosa, V. C. F., J. B. C. Silva, and W. E. Medeiros, 1999, Stability analysis and improvement of structural index estimation in Euler deconvolution: Geophysics, 64, 48-60.
2. Fairhead, J. D., K. J. Bennet, D. R. H. Gordon, and D. Huang, 1994, Euler: Beyond the "Black Box": 64th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 422-424.
3. Gunn, P. J., 1997, Quantitative methods for interpreting aeromagnetic data: A subjective review: Journal of Australian Geology & Geophysics, 17, 105-113.
4. Hsu, S.-K., 2002, Imaging magnetic sources using Euler's equation: Geophysical Prospecting, 50, 15-25.
5. Mushayandebvu, M. F., V. Lesur, A. B. Reid, and J. D. Fairhead, 2004, Grid Enter deconvolution with constraints for 2D structures: Geophysics, 69, 489-496.
6. Mushayandebvu, M. F., P. van Driel, A. B. Reid, and J. D. Fairhead, 2001, Magnetic source parameters of two-dimensional structures using extended Euler deconvolution: Geophysics, 66, 814-823.
7. Nabighian, M. N., and R. O. Hansen, 2001, Unification of Euler and Werner deconvolution in three dimensions via the generalized Hilbert transform: Geophysics, 66, 1805-1810.
8. Naudy, H., 1971, Automatic determination of depth on aeromagnetic profiles: Geophysics, 36, 717-722.
9. Phillips, J. D., 2002, Two-step processing for 3D magnetic source locations and structural indices using extended Euler or analytic signal methods: 72nd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 727-730.
10. Ravat, D., 1996, Analysis of the Euler method and its applicability in environmental magnetic investigations: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1, 229-238.
11. Reid, A. B., J. M. Allsop, H. Granser, A. J. Millett, and I. W. Somerton, 1990, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution: Geophysics, 55, 80-91.
12. Roest, W. R., V. Verhoef, and M. Pilkington, 1992, Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal: Geophysics, 57, 116-125.
13. Spector, A., and F. S. Grant, 1970, Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data: Geophysics, 35, 293-302.
14. Thompson, D. T., 1982, EULDPH: A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data: Geophysics, 47, 31-37.
15. Werner, S., 1953, Interpretation of magnetic anomalies of sheet-like bodies: Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Årsbok 43(1949), No. 6.
16. Williams, S. E., J. D. Fairhead, and G. Flanagan, 2003, Grid-based Euler deconvolution: Completing the circle with 2D constrained Euler: 73rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 572-575.