The categorical distinction of vowel and consonant representations: Evidence from dysgraphia

Neurocase

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 109-121

  Miceli, Gabriele ^a,b,c   Capasso, Rita ^b   Benvegnù, Barbara ^b   Caramazza, Alfonso ^c  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b IRCCS FONDAZIONE SANTA LUCIA   (Italy)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; ATAXIC APHASIA; BRAIN INJURY; CASE REPORT; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONSONANT; DYSGRAPHIA; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPEECH; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOWEL; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 6444227289     PISSN: 13554794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13554790409609942     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Andersen RA, Asanuma C, Cowan WM. Callosal and prefrontal associational projecting cell populations in area 7A of the macaque monkey: A study using retrogradely transported fluorescent dyes. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1985; 232: 443-55.
2. Bortolini U, Tagliavini C, Zampolli A. Lessico di frequenza della lingua italiana contemporanea. Italy: IBM, 1971.
3. Caramazza A, Chialant D, Capasso R, Miceli G. Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature 2000; 403: 428-30.
4. Caramazza A, Miceli G. Orthographic structure, the Graphemic Buffer and the spelling process. In: von Euler C, editor. Brain and reading. MacMillan/ Wenner-Gren International Symposium Series, 1989; 257-68.
5. Caramazza A, Miceli G. The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition 1990; 37: 243-97.
6. Caramazza A, Miceli G, Villa G. The role of the (output) phonological buffer in reading, writing and repetition. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1986; 3: 37-76.
7. Caramazza A, Miceli G, Villa G, Romani C. The role of the graphemic buffer in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition 1987; 26: 59-85.
8. Chafee MV, Goldman-Rakic PS. Matching patterns of activity in primate prefrontal area 8a and parietal area 7ip neurons during a spatial working memory task. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1998; 79: 2919-40.
9. Chafee MV, Goldman-Rakic PS. Inactivation of parietal and prefrontal cortex reveals interdependence of neural activity during memory-guided saccades. Journal of Neurophysiology 2000; 83: 1550-66.
10. Cotelli M, Aboutalebi J, Zorzi M, Cappa S. Vowels in the buffer: A case study of acquired dysgraphia with selective vowel substitutions. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2003; 20: 99-114.
11. Cubelli R. A selective deficit for writing vowels in acquired dysgraphia. Nature 1991; 353: 258-60.
12. Glasspool DW. Serial order in behaviour: Evidence from performance slips. In: Houghton G, editor. Connectionist modeling in psychology. Hove: Psychology Press, 2000.
13. Glasspool DW, Houghton G. Dynamic representation of structural constraints in models of serial behavior. In: Bullinaria J, Glasspool DW, Hughton G, editors. Connectionist representations. Proceedings of the 4th neural computation and psychology workshop. London: Springer-Verlag, 1997; 269-82.
14. Glasspool DW, Houghton G. Serial order and consonant-vowel structure in a model of disordered spelling. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15. Hartley T, Houghton G. A linguistically-constrained model of short-term memory for words and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language 1996; 35: 1-31.
16. Jónsdottír MK, Shallice T, Wise R. Phonological mediation and the graphemic buffer disorder in spelling: cross-language differences? Cognition 1996; 59: 169-97.
17. Katz RB. Limited retention of information in the graphemic buffer. Cortex 1991; 27: 111-9.
18. Kay J, Hanley J. Peripheral disorder of spelling: The role of the graphemic buffer. In: Bron GDA, Ellis NC, editors. Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1994; 295-315.
19. Levy R, Goldman-Rakic PS. Segregation of working memory functions within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Experimental Brain Research 2000; 133: 23-32.
20. McCloskey M, Badecker W, Goodman-Shulman R, Aliminosa D. The structure of graphemic representations in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1994; 11: 341-92.
21. Miceli G, Laudanna A, Burani C, Capasso R. Batteria per l'Analisi dei Deficit Afasici (BADA). Roma: CEPSAG, 1994.
22. Morton J. The logogen model and orthographic structure. In: Frith U, editor. Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press, 1980; 117-34.
23. Paulesu E, Frith CD, Frachowiak RS. The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory. Nature 1993; 362: 342-5.
24. Rapp B, Caramazza A. From graphemes to abstract letter shapes: Levels of representation in written spelling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997; 23: 1130-52.
25. Schiller NO, Greenhall JA, Shelton JR, Caramazza A. Serial order effects in spelling errors: Evidence from two dysgraphic patients. Neurocase 2001; 7: 1-14.
26. Shallice T, Glasspool DW, Houghton G. Can neuropsychological evidence inform connectionist modeling? Analyses of spelling. Language and Cognitive Processes 1995; 10: 192-225.
27. Shallice T, Rumiati RI, Zadini A. The selective impairment of the phonological output buffer. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2000; 17: 517-46.
28. Smith EE, Jonides J. Neuroimaging analyses of human working memory. Proceedings of National Academic Science USA 1998; 95: 12061-68.
29. Tainturier M-J, Rapp B. The spelling process. In: Rapp B, editor. The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology. Hove: Psychology Press, 2001; 263-90.
30. Ward J, Romani C. Serial position effects and lexical activation in spelling: Evidence from a single case study. Neurocase 1998; 4: 189-206.
31. Wing AM, Baddeley AD. Spelling errors in handwriting: A corpus and a distributional analysis. In: Frith U, editor. Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press, 1980; 251-86.