Damage-induced reactivation of cohesin in postreplicative DNA repair

BioEssays

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 5-9

  Ball Jr , Alexander R ^a   Yokomori, Kyoko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATR PROTEIN; COHESIN; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA;

CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CHROMATID; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SJOEGREN SYNDROME;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, FUNGAL; GENOME, FUNGAL; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE;

EID: 38049007845     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.20691     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Ström L, Karlsson C, Lindroos HB, Wedahl S, Katou Y, et al. 2007. Postreplicative formation of cohesion is required for repair and induced by a single DNA break. Science 317:242-245.
2. Ünal E, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Koshland D. 2007. DNA double-strand breaks trigger genome-wide sister-chromatid cohesion through Eco1 (Ctf7). Science 317:245-248.
3. West SC. 2003. Molecular views of recombination proteins and their control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:435-445.
4. Guacci V, Koshland D, Strunnikov A. 1997. A direct link between sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation revealed through the analysis of MCD1 in S. cerevisiae. Cell 91:47-57
5. Losada A, Hirano M, Hirano T. 1998. Identification of Xenopus SMC protein complexes required for sister chromatid cohesion. Genes Dev 12:1986-1997.
6. Michaelis C, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K. 1997. Cohesins: Chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91:35-45.
7. Hirano T. 2006. At the heart of the chromosome: SMC proteins in action. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:311-322.
8. Arumugam P, Gruber S, Tanaka K, Haering CH, Mechtler K, et al. 2003. ATP hydrolysis is required for cohesin's association with chromosomes. Curr Biol 13:1941-1953.
9. Weitzer S, Lehane C, Uhlmann F. 2003. A model for ATP hydrolysis-dependent binding of cohesin to DNA. Curr Biol 13:1930-1940.
10. Ciosk R, Shirayama M, Shevchenko A, Tanaka T, Toth A, et al. 2000. Cohesin's binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol Cell 5:243-254.
11. Blat Y, Kleckner N. 1999. Cohesins bind to preferential sites along yeast chromosome III, with differential regulation along arms versus the centric region. Cell 98:249-259.
12. Laloraya S, Guacci V, Koshland D. 2000. Chromosomal addresses of the cohesin component Mod1p. J Cell Biol 151:1047-1056.
13. Tanaka T, Cosma MP, Wirth K, Nasmyth K. 1999. Identification of cohesin association sites at centromeres and along chromosome arms. Cell 98: 847-858.
14. Lengronne A, Katou Y, Mori S, Yokobayashi S, Kelly GP, et al. 2004. Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription. Nature 430:573-578.
15. Glynn EF, Megee PC, Yu HG, Mistrot C, Ünal E, et al. Genome-wide mapping of the cohesin complex in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol 2:E259.
16. Gillespie PJ, Hirano T. 2004. Scc2 couples replication licensing to sister chromatid cohesion in Xenopus egg extracts. Curr Biol 14:1598-1603.
17. Takahashi TS, Yiu P, Chou MF, Gygi S, Walter JC. 2004. Recruitment of Xenopus Scc2 and cohesin to chromatin requires the pre-replication complex. Nat Cell Biol 6:991-996.
18. Watrin E, Schleiffer A, Tanaka K, Eisenhaber F, Nasmyth K, et al. 2006. Human Scc4 is required for cohesin binding to chromatin, sister-chromatid cohesion, and mitotic progression. Curr Biol 16:863-874.
19. Toth A, Ciosk R, Uhlmann F, Galova M, Schleiffer A, et al. 1999. Yeast cohesin complex requires a conserved protein, Eco1p (Ctf7), to establish cohesion between sister chromatids during DNA replication. Genes Dev 13:320-333.
20. Skibbens RV, Corson LB, Koshland D, Hieter P. 1999. Ctf7p is essential for sister chromatid cohesion and links mitotic chromosome structure to the DNA replication machinery. Genes Dev 13:307-319.
21. Ivanov D, Schleiffer A, Eisenhaber F, Mechtler K, Haering CH, et al. 2002. Eco1 is a novel acetyltransferase that can acetylate proteins involved in cohesion. Curr Biol 12:323-328.
22. Brands A, Skibbens RV. 2005. Ctf7p/Eco1p exhibits acetyltransferase activity - but does it matter? Curr Biol 15:R50-R51.
23. Moldovan GL, Pfander B, Jentsch S. 2006. PCNA controls establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during S phase. Mol Cell 23:723-732.
24. Hanna JS, Kroll ES, Lundblad V, Spencer FA. 2001. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 are required for sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Cell Biol 21:3144-3158.
25. Lengronne A, McIntyre J, Katou Y, Kanoh Y, Hopfner KP, et al. 2006. Establishment of sister chromatid cohesion at the S. cerevisiae replication fork. Mol Cell 23:787-799.
26. Mayer ML, Gygi SP, Aebersold R, Hieter P. 2001. Identification of RFC(Ctf18p, Ctf8p, Dcc1p): an alternative RFC complex required for sister chromatid cohesion in S. cerevisiae. Mol cell 7:959-970.
27. Wang Z, Castaño IB, De Las Peñas A, Adams C, Christman MF. 2000. Pol Kappa: a DNA polymerase required for sister chromatid cohesion. Science 289:774-779.
28. Ström L, Lindroos HB, Shirahige K, Sjögren C. 2004, Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol Cell 16:1003-1015.
29. Sjögren C, Nasmyth K. 2001. Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Biol 11:991-995.
30. Sonoda E, Matsusaka T, Morrison C, Vagnarelli P, Hoshi O, et al. 2001. Scc1/Rad21/Mcd1 is required for sister chromatid cohesion and kinetochore function in vertebrate cells. Dev Cell 1:759-770.
31. Kim J-S, Krasieva TB, LaMorte VJ, Taylor AMR, Yokomori K. 2002. Specific recruitment of human cohesin to laser-induced DNA damage. J Biol Chem 277:45149-45153.
32. Ünal E, Arbel-Eden A, Sattler U, Shroff R, Lichten M, et al. 2004. DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol Cell 16:991-1002.
33. Potts PR, Porteus MH, Yu H. 2006. Human SMC5/6 complex promotes sister chromatid homologous recombination by recruiting the SMC1/3 cohesin complex to double-strand breaks. EMBO J 25:3377-3388.
34. Ogiwara H, Ohuchi T, Ui A, Tada S, Enomoto T, et al. 2007. Ctf18 is required for homologous recombination-mediated double-strand break repair. Nuc Acids Res 35:4989-5000.
35. De Piccoli G, Cortes-Ledesma F, Ira G, Torres-Rosell J, Uhle S, et al 2006. Smc5-Smc6 mediate DNA double-strand-break repair by promoting sister-chromatid recombination. Nat Cell Biol 8:1032-1034.
36. Lehmann Ar, Walicka M, Griffiths DJ, Murray JM, Watts FZ, et al. 1995. The rad18 gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe defines a new subgroup of the SMC superfamily involved in DNA repair. Mol Cell Biol 15:7067-7080.
37. Andrews EA, Palecek J, Sergeant J, Taylor E, Lehmann AR, et al. 2005. Nse2, a component of the Smc 5-6complex, is a SUMO ligase required for the response to DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 25:185-196.
38. Potts PR, Yu H. 2005. Human MMS21/NSE2 is a SUMO ligase required for DNA repair. Mol Cell Biol 25:7021-7032.
39. Zhao X, Blobel G. 2005. A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:4777-4782.
40. Abraham RT. 2004. PI 3-kinase related kinases: 'big' players in stress-induced signaling pathways. DNA Repair 3:883-887.
41. Jazayeri A, Falck J, Lukas C, Bartek J, Smith GC, et al. 2006. ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Cell Biol 8:37-45.
42. Kitagawa R, Bakkenist CJ, McKinnon PJ, Kastan MB. 2004. Phosphorylation of SMC1 is a critical downstream event in the ATM-NBS1-BRCA1 pathway. Genes Dev 18:1423-1438.
43. Osley MA, Tsukuda T, Nickoloff JA. 2007. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors and DNA damage repair. Mut Res 618:65-80.
44. Vega H, Waisfisz Q, Gordillo M, Sakai N, Yanagihara I, et al. 2005. Roberts syndrome is caused by mutations in ESCO2, a human homolog of yeast ECO1 that is essential for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Nat Genet 37:468-470.
45. Hou F, Chu CW, Kong X, Yokomori K, Zou H. 2007. The acetyltransferase activity of San stabilizes the mitotic cohesin at the centromeres in a shugoshin-independent manner. J Cell Biol 177:587-597.
46. Hou F, Zou H. 2005. Two human orthologues of Eco1/Ctf7 acetyltransferases are both required for proper sister-chromatid cohesion. Mol Biol Cell 16:3908-3918.
47. Sumara I, Vorlaufer E, Stukenberg PT, Kelm O, Redemann N, et al. 2002. The dissociation of cohesin from chromosomes in prophase is regulated by Polo-like kinase. Mol Cell 9:515-525.
48. Losada A, Hirano M, Hirano T. 2002. Cohesin release is required for sister chromatid resolution, but not for condensin-mediated compaction, at the onset of mitosis. Genes Dev 16:3004-3016.