Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: A community-based study

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 177, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 535-541

  Yankaskas, B C ^a   Schell, M J ^a   Bird, R E ^a   Desrochers, D A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COMMUNITY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0034877724     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.177.3.1770535     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Perceived sensitivity of mammographic screening: Women's views on test accuracy and financial compensation for missed cancers
2. An analysis of reported discomfort caused by mammographic X-ray amongst attenders at an Australian pilot breast screening program
3. The medical legal implications of following mammographic breast masses
4. Medical and legal implications of screening and follow-up procedures for breast cancer
5. Delay in diagnosis of breast cancer
6. Malpractice litigation involving patients with carcinoma of the breast
7. The Carolina Mammography Registry: A population-based mammography and cancer surveillance project
8. Interval breast cancers are not biologically distinct - Just more difficult to diagnose
9. Monitoring interval cancers in an Australian mammography screening programme
10. Improvement in mammography interpretation skills in a community radiology practice after dedicated teaching courses: 2-Year medical audit of 38,633 cases
11. Mammography use and outcomes in a community: The Greater Lansing Area Mammography Study
12. Analysis and classification of interval cancers in a French breast cancer screening programme
13. Interval cancers and sensitivity in the screening centres of the UK trial of early detection of breast cancer
14. Breast cancer after a negative screen: Follow-up of women participating in the DOM Screening Programme
15. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: Results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme
16. The New Mexico Mammography Project: Screening mammography performance in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1991 to 1993
17. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: Analysis and classification
18. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of breast imaging in the detection of cancer
19. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography
20. Analysis of clinically occult and mammographically occult breast tumors
21. Breast cancer missed by mammography
22. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography
23. Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age: New results from the Swedish Two-County Trial
24. Clinically occult breast lesions: Localization and significance
25. Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: A study in Nijmegen, The Netherlands
26. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: Review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico
27. Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists
28. So-called interval cancers of the breast: Pathologic and radiologic analysis of sixty-four cases
29. Two models for radiological reviewing of interval cancers
30. Invasive interval cancers in the Ostergotland Mammographic Screening Programme: Radiological analysis
31. Comparison of radiographer/radiologist double film reading with single reading in breast cancer screening
32. Mammography screening: An incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms
33. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program
34. Double reading of mammography screening films: One radiologist or two?
35. The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screening