Correlation of lesion appearance and histologic findings for the nodes of a breast MR imaging interpretation model

Radiographics

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 79-92

  Nunes, Linda White ^a   Schnall, Mitchell D ^b   Orel, Susan G ^b   Hochman, Mary G ^c   Langlotz, Curtis P ^b   Reynolds, Carol A ^b   Torosian, Michael H ^b  

^a HAHNEMANN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast, MR, 00.1214; Images, interpretation; Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies, 00.1214

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; DECISION TREE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DECISION TREES; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0032622371     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.19.1.g99ja0379     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 1997; 202:833-841.
2. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Siegelman E, et al. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. AJR 1997; 169: 409-415.
3. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Drew PJ, et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast combined with analysis of contrast agent kinetics in the differentiation of primary breast tumours. Clin Radiol 1997; 52:516-526.
4. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994; 190:485-493.
5. Hochman MG, Orel SG, Powell CM, Schnall MD, Reynolds CA, White L. Fibroadenomas: variety of MR imaging appearances with radiologic-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1997; 204: 123-129.
6. Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, Schnall MD, Solin LJ, Sullivan DC. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 1997; 202:413-420.
7. Sherif H, Mahfouz AE, Oellinger H, et al. Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. Radiology 1997; 205:209-213.
8. Friedman EP, Hall-Craggs MA, Mumtaz H, Schneidau A. Breast MR and the appearance of the normal and abnormal nipple. Clin Radiol 1997; 52:854-861.
9. Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, DeBruhl ND, et al. Multifeature analysis of GD-enhanced MR images of breast lesions. JMRI 1997; 7:1016-1026.
10. Kelcz F, Santyr GE, Cron GO, Mongin SJ. Application of a quantitative model to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions detected by dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MRI. JMRI 1996: 6:743-752.
11. Soderstrom CE, Harms SE, Copit DS, et al. Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 1996; 201:427-432.
12. Rubens D, Trotterman S, Chacko AK, et al. Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced chemical-shift MR imaging of the breast. AJR 1991; 157: 267-270.
13. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Patterns of peripheral enhancement in breast masses: correlation of findings on contrast medium enhanced MRI with histologic features and tumor angiogenesis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21:421-430.