Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 179, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 671-677

  Lewin, John M ^a   D'Orsi, Carl J ^a   Hendrick, R Edward ^a   Moss, Lawrence J ^a   Isaacs, Pamela K ^a   Karellas, Andrew ^a   Cutter, Gary R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 0036721482     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.179.3.1790671     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Mammography in 53,803 women from the New Hampshire Mammography Network
2. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: Review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico
3. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: Comparison of interval- and screendetected cancers
4. Digital mammography and related technologies: A perspective from the National Cancer Institute
5. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography
6. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography for cancer detection: Results of 4945 paired examinations
7. Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: Physical characteristics of a clinical prototype
8. Free-response methodology: Alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment
9. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases