On the characterization of dynamic supramolecular systems: A general mathematical association model for linear supramolecular copolymers and application on a complex two-component hydrogen-bonding system

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 34, 2007, Pages 9617-9636

  Odille, Fabrice G J ^a   Jónsson, Stefán ^a   Stjernqvist, Susann ^a   Rydén, Tobias ^a   Wärnmark, Kenneth ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Analytical methods; Mathematical chemistry; NMR spectroscopy; Polymers; Supramolecular chemistry

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEN BONDS; LINEAR ALGEBRA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; POLYMERS; REACTION KINETICS; SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY;

ANALYTICAL METHODS; COMPLEX DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM; MATHEMATICAL CHEMISTRY; SUPRAMOLECULAR ASSEMBLIES;

COPOLYMERS;

EID: 36649022632     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: 15213765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200700032     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. a) H.-J. Schneider, A. Yatsimirsky, Principles and Methods in Supramolecular Chemistry. Wiley, Chichester. UK, 2000;
2. b) C. R. Cantor, P. R. Schimmel, Biophysical Chemistry, Part II: Techniques for the Study of Biological structure and Function. Freeman, San Francisco. USA, 1980.
3. For examples of reviews see: a) J.-M. Lehn. Supramolecular Chemistry-Concepts and Perspectives, VCH, Weinheim, 1995, Chapter 9;
4. b) C. T Imrie, Trends Polym. Sci. 1995, 3, 22-29;
5. c) F. Zeng, S. C. Zimmermann, Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1681-1712;
6. d) R. F. M. Lange, M. vanGurp, E.W. Meijer. J. Polym. Sci. Part A 1999, 37, 3657-3670;
7. e) J. S. Moore, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 1999, 4, 108-116;
8. f) R. P. Sijbesma. E. W. Meijer. Curr. Opin. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 1999, 4, 24-32:
9. g) L. Brunsveld, B. J. B. Folmer, E. W. Meijer, R. P. Sijbesma, Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 4071-4097;
10. h) J.-M. Lehn, Polym. Int. 2002, 51, 825-839;
11. i) J.-C. Dai, Z.-Y Fu, X.-T. Wu. Encycl. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2004, 10. 247-266;
12. j) A. Ciferri. Supramolecular Polymers. Taylor and Francis. Boca Raton, USA, 2005.
13. C. Fouquey, J.-M. Lehn, A.-M. Levelut, Adv. Mater. 1990, 2, 254-257.
14. For reviews on hydrogen-bonded supramolecular polymers, see: a) A. T. ten Cate, R. P. Sijbesma, Macromoi. Rapid Commun. 2002, 23, 1094-1112;
15. b) A.W Bosman, L. Brunsveld, B. J. B. Folmer, R. P. Sijbesma, E. W. Meijer, Macromol. Symp. 2003, 201, 143-154;
16. c) G. Armstrong, M. Buggy, J. Mater. Sci. 2005, 40, 547-559;
17. d) P. S. Corbin, S.C. Zimmerman in Supramolecular Polymers (Ed.: A. Ciferri). Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton. USA, 2005, pp. 153-185.
18. Recent examples of supramolecular hydrogen-bonded copolymers: a) F. Würthner, C. Thalacker, A. Sautter, W. Schärtl, W. Ibach, O. Hollricher, Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 3871-3886;
19. b) V. Berl, M. Schmutz, M. J. Krische, R. G. Khoury, J.-M. Lehn, Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1227-1244;
20. c) R. Takasawa, K. Murota, I. Yoshikawa, K. Araki, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2003, 24. 335-339:
21. d) F. Lortie, S. Boileau, L. Bouteiller, Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 3008-3014;
22. e) J. H. K. Ky Hirschberg, A. Ramazi, R. P. Sijbesma, E. W. Meijer, Macromolecules 2003, 36, 1429-1432;
23. f) W. H. Binder, M. J. Kunz, E. Ingolic, J. Polym. Sci. Part A 2004, 42, 162-172;
24. g) W. H. Binder, M. J. Kunz, C. Kluger, G. Hayn, R. Saf. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 1749-1759;
25. h) J. Fu. E. A. Fogleman, S. L. Craig, Macromolecules 2004, 37, 1863-1870;
26. i) G. B. W. L. Ligthart, H. Ohkawa, R. P. Sijbesma, E. W. Meijer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 810-811;
27. j) W. H. Binder, S. Bernstorff, C. Kluger, L. Petraru, M. J. Kunz, Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 2824-2828;
28. k) H. Nakadc, M. F. Ilker, B.J. Jordan, O. Uzun, N. L. LaPointe, E. B. Coughlin, V. M. Rotello, Chem. Commun. 2005, 3271-3273;
29. l) V. G. H. Lafitte, A. E. Aliev, P.N. Horton, M. B. Hursthouse, K. Bala. P. Golding, H. C. Hailes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6544-6545.
30. F. Lortie, S. Boileau, L. Bouteiller, C. Chassenieux, F. Lauprêtre, Macromolecules 2005, 38, 5283-5287.
31. The DOSY-technique: a) K. F. Morris, C.S. Johnson, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 3139-3141;
32. b) C. S. Johnson, Jr., Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 1999, 34, 203-256;
33. c) K. F. Morris. P. Stilbs. C.S. Johnson, Jr., Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 211-215; for applications on hydrogen-bonded systems see for instance :
34. d) R. J. B. Folmer, R. P. Sijbesma, E. W. Meijer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2093-2094:
35. e) S. Arai. D. Niwa, H. Nishide, S. Takeoka, Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 17-20.
36. S. H. M. Söntjens, R. P. Sijbesma, M. H. P. Van Genderen, E. W. Meijer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7487-7493:
37. R. K. Castellano, S. L. Craig, C Nuckolls. J. Rebek, Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7876-7882.
38. C. A. Hunter, S. Tomas, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8975-8979.
39. For dynamic systems, using method 1). the dissociation at internal positions will still take place when the ends are blocked. Using method 3). the disadvantage would be that the spectrum of possible monomers, those having acceptor and donor properties, respectively, is limited, thus limiting the number of different possible supramolecular polymers available.
40. [7c] however, a situation far from the case with dynamic supramolecular polymers.
41. L. Fielding, Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6151 -6170.
42. A. N. Veselkov, M. P. Evstigneev, D. A. Veselkov, D. B. Davies. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 2252-2266.
43. For examples, see: R. P Sijbesma, F. H Beijer, L. Brunsveld, B. J. B. Folmer, J. H. K. K. Hirschberg, R. F. M. Lange, J. K. L Lowe, E. W. Meijer, Science 1997, 278, 1601 -1604 and references [5a,b,i].
44. R. B. Martin. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 3043-3064.
45. a) J. L. Dimicoli, C. Helene, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 1036-1044;
46. b) K. Weller, H. Schuetz, I. Petri, Biophys. Chem. 1984, 19, 289298;
47. c) F. Aradi, A. Foldesi, Magn. Reson. Chem. 1985, 23, 375-378;
48. d) F. Aradi, A. Foldesi, Magn. Reson. Chem. 1989. 27, 249-252:
49. e) J. Kapuscinsky; M. Kimmel. Biophys. Chem. 1993, 46, 153-163;
50. f) J.-S. Chen, J.-C. Shiao. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1994. 90, 429-433
51. g) J. Baxter, M. P. Williamson. T. H. Lilley. E. Haslam, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1996, 92, 231-234;
52. h) R. W Larsen, R. Jasuja. R. Hetzler. P. T. Muraoka, V. D. Andrada, D. Jameson, Biophys. J. 1996, 70,443-452:
53. i) D. B Davies. D. A. Veselkov, A. N Veselkov. MoI Phys. 1999, 97, 439-451;
54. j) D. B. Davies. D. A. Veselkov, V. V. Kodintsev, M. P. Evestigneev. A. N. Veselkov, MoI Phys. 2000. 98. 1961-1971.
55. K. M. Sanders, Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 1378-1383.
56. a) S. Jónsson. F.G.J. Odille. P-O. Norrby, K. Wärnmark, Chem. Commun. 2005, 549-551:
57. b) S. Jónsson, F. G. J. Odille, R-O. Norrby, K. Wärnmark, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2006, 4, 1927-1948.
58. a) G. G Hammes, A. C. Park, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 956-961;
59. b) G. G. Hammes, H. O. Spivey, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 1621 -1625.
60. Cyclic dimers have been assembled using this concept by Wuest. See for example: Y. Ducharme, J. D. Wuest, J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 5787-5789.
61. a) MacroModel Version 8.5 from Schrödinger Inc., F. Mohamadi, N. G. J. Richards, W. C. Guida, R. Liskamp, M. Lipton, M. C. Caulfield, G. Chang, T. Hendrickson, W. C. Still, J. Comput. Chem. 1990. 11, 440-467;
62. b) the energy was minimized using the MM3* force field: N. L. Allinger, Y. H. Yuh, J.-H. Lii, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8551-8566.
63. P. J. Flory, Statistical Mechanics of Chain Molecules. Wiley, New York, 1969.
64. F. Garland, S. D. Christian, J. Phys. Chem. 1975, 79, 1247-1252.
65. D. Zhao, J. S. Moore, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3471-3491.
66. See references [15] and [24], and references therein.
67. S. E. Levinson, L. R. Rabiner, M. M. Sondhi, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1983, 62, 1035-1074.
68. T.
69. T.
70. E. Boucher, M. Simard, J. D. Wuest, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1408-1412.
71. ESIMS of the equilibrium mixture was attempted but failed due to the fact that at the operating conditions for ESIMS. the solution is so diluted that the equilibrium system is far from the total concentration at which the mole fraction of cyclic trimer 7 is at its maximum. This means that for the actual system on which the ESIMS is recorded, not only the total concentration of species is low, but so is the concentration of 7.
72. Cyclic structures of higher association degree are also feasible according to molecular modeling. However, due to the entropie penalty cost for their formation, they are less likely compared to the cyclic trimer.
73. For excellent discussions about criteria for NMR-titrations, see: "Design. Synthesis, and Evaluation of an Efficacious Functional Group Dyad. Methods and Limitations in the use of NMR for Measuring Host-Guest Interactions": C. S. Wilcox in Frontiers in Supramolecular Organic Chemistry and Photochemistry (Eds.: H.-J. Schneider, H. Dürr), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1991, pp. 121-143
74. and K. Hirose. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2001, 39, 193-209.
75. Care must be exercised in adding more equilibria to existing ones without having strong indications that such equilibria exist as this will add more parameters to the fit since the estimate of the variance of the fit increases monotonically with the number of parameters of the fit. See: P. J. Brockwell, R. A. Davis, Time series: Theory and Methods. 2nd ed., Springer. New York, 1991, p. 287.