Dual mechanisms of DNA damage by MoCH3(η3-allyl) (CO)2(phen) complexes

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 72, Issue 23, 2007, Pages 8755-8759

  Mohler, Debra L ^a,b   Shell, Jennifer R ^b   Coonce, Janet G ^b   Mirandi, Jessica L ^a   Riera, Lucía ^c   Cuesta, Luciano ^c   Pérez, Julio ^c  

^a JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACKBONE CLEAVAGE; BASE-LABILE RESIDUES; DEOXYRIBOSE MOIETY; DUAL MECHANISMS;

MOLYBDENUM COMPOUNDS; ORGANIC CHEMICALS;

DNA;

8 HYDROXYGUANINE; DNA; METHOXYGUANINE; METHYLGUANINE; MOLYBDENUM; MOLYBDENUM COMPLEX; PIPERIDINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; AUTORADIOGRAPHY; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; DNA DAMAGE; GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PHOTOLYSIS; REACTION ANALYSIS;

DNA; DNA DAMAGE; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; MOLYBDENUM; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PLASMIDS;

EID: 35948986266     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo0712704     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Friedberg, E. C. Nature 2003, 421, 436-440.
2. Christmann, M.; Tomicic, M. T.; Roos, W. P.; Kaina, B. Toxicology 2003, 193, 3-34.
3. Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. Nature 2001, 411, 366-374.
4. Yamada, M.; O'Regan, E.; Brown R.; Karran, P. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 491-496.
5. Lin, D. P.; Wang, Y.; Sherer, S. J.; Clark, A. B.; Yang, K.; Avdievich, E.; Jin, B.; Werling, U.; Parries, T.; Kurihara, N.; Umar, A.; Kucherlapati, R.; Lipkin, M.; Kunkel T. A.; Edelmann, W. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 517-522.
6. For examples of chemical approaches to ameliorating cisplatin resistance: Natile, G; Marzilli, L. G. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 1315-1331.
7. Guddneppanavar, R.; Saluta, G.; Kucera, G. L.; Bierbach, U. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 3204-3214.
8. van Zutphen, S.; Reedijk, J. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005, 249, 2845-2853.
9. Other agents have shown both backbone modification and base oxidation, although not simultaneously with a single activation method. For examples, see: Hall D. B.; Barton, J. K. Nature 1996, 382, 731-735.
10. Boerner L. J. K.; Zaleski, J. M. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9, 135-144.
11. Pérez, J.; Riera, L.; Riera, V.; García-Granda, S.; García-Rodríguez, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7469-7470.
12. Mohler, D. L.; Downs, J. R.; Hurley-Predecki, A. L.; Sallman, J. R.; Gannett P. M.; Shi, X. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 9093-9102.
13. Riordan, C. G.; Wei, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2189-2190.
14. Povirk, L. F.; Wübker, W.; Köhnlein, W.; Hutchinson, F. Nucleic Acids Res. 1977, 4, 3573-3580.
15. The number of single- and double-strand cleavage events was determined via the statistical test of Povirk et al., which assumes a Poisson distribution of strand cuts; see ref 7.
16. h + 1)/4L: Freifelder, D.; Trumbo, B. Biopolymers 1969, 7, 681], in which h is the maximum separation in base pairs between cuts on opposite strand that produces linear DNA (h = 16) and L is the number of phosphodiester bonds per strand of DNA (4361 for pBR322).
17. Densitometry was accomplished with the NIH ImageJ software program. The amount of supercoiled DNA was multiplied by a factor of 1.22 to account for reduced ethidium bromide intercalation into the form I plasmid DNA.
18. Burrows, C. J.; Muller, J. G. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1109-1151.
19. Huston, P.; Espenson, J. H.; Bakac, A. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 720-722.
20. Connolly, T. J.; Baldoví, M. V.; Mohtat, N.; Scaiano, J. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 4919-4922.
21. Tenhaeff, S. C.; Covert, K. J.; Castellani, M. P.; Grunkemeier, J.; Kunz, C.; Weakley, T. J. R.; Koenig, T.; Tyler, D. R. Organometallics 1993, 12, 5000-5004.
22. Goldstein, S.; Samuni, A. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2007, 111, 1066-1072.
23. Damiani, E.; Kalinska, B.; Canapa, A.; Canestrari, S.; Wozniak, M.; Olmo, E.; Greci, L. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2000, 28, 1257-1265.
24. Pogozelski, W. K.; Tullius, T. D. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1089-1107.
25. Frank, B. L.; Worth, L., Jr.; Christner, D. F.; Kozarich, J. W.; Stubbe, J.; Kappen, L. S.; Goldberg, I. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2271-2275;
26. Goldberg, I. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991, 24, 191-198.
27. Sitlani, A.; Long, E. C.; Pyle, A. M.; Barton, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 2302-2312.
28. Hecht, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1986, 19, 383-391.
29. Giloni, L.; Takeshita, M.; Johnson, F.; Iden, C.; Grollman, A. P. J. Biol. Chem. 1981, 256, 8608-8615.
30. Meijier, M. M.; Zelenko, O.; Sigman, D. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1135-1136.
31. Bales, B. C.; Kodama, T.; Weledji, Y. N.; Pitié, M.; Meunier, B.; Greenberg, M. M. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 5371-5379.
32. Dizdaroglu, M. Methods Enzymol. 1994, 234, 3-16.
33. For example: Auguste, O. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 1993, 15, 329-336.
34. Hix, S.; Da Silva, M.; Augusto, O. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 1995, 19, 293-301.
35. Zady, M. F.; Wong, J. L. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 45, 2373-2377.
36. Zady, M. F.; Wong, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 5096-5101.
37. It has been asserted that methylperoxyl radical is a poor hydrogen atom abstractor, because of the slowness of this reaction. For a detailed discussion of the rates of the processes in Scheme 3, see ref 6.
38. Interestingly, complexes 1 and 2 are some of the very few Mo complexes that have been found to cause DNA cleavage: Peng, J.; Li, W.; Zhao, X.; Han, Z.; Huang, B. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2004, 20, 6-9.
39. Lu, X.-M.; Jiang, L.; Mao, X.-A.; Ye, C.-H.; Lu, J.-F.; Cui, J.-R. Chin. J. Chem. 2005, 23, 781-785.