Gender differences in introductory university physics performance: The influence of high school physics preparation and affective factors

Science Education

Volumn 91, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 847-876

  Hazari, Zahra ^a   Tai, Robert H ^b   Sadler, Philip M ^a  

^a HARVARD SMITHSONIAN CENTER FOR ASTROPHYSICS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35948972836     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: 1098237X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20223     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1-52.
2. Aikenhead, G. (2005). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Alsop, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Science education and affect. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1043-1047.
5. Alters, B. J. (1995). Counseling physics students: A research basis. The Physics Teacher, 33(6), 413-415.
6. Andre, T., Whigham, M., Hendrickson, A., & Chambers, S. (1999). Competency beliefs, positive affect, and gender stereotypes of elementary students and their parents about science versus other school subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(6), 719-747.
7. Baker, D., & Leary, R. (2003). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,40(Suppl.), S176-S200.
8. Barker, B. ( 1997). Girls' world or anxious times: What's really happening at school in the gender war. Educational Review, 49(3), 221-227.
9. Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., et al. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 271-311.
10. Bell, J. (2001). Investigating gender differences in the science performance of 16-year-old pupils in the UK. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 469-486.
11. Bouchard, P., St-Amant, J. C., & Deslandes, R. (1998). Family variables as predictors of school achievement: Sex differences in Quebec adolescents. Canadian Journal of Education, 23(4), 390-404.
12. Brickhouse, N., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441-458.
13. Carlone, H. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls' access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 392-414.
14. Cavallo, A. M. L., Potter, W. H., & Rozman, M. (2004). Gender differences in learning constructs, shifts in learning constructs, and their relationship to course achievement in a structured inquiry, yearlong college physics course for life science majors. School Science & Mathematics, 104(6), 288-300.
15. Chambers, S., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 107-123.
16. Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 471-486.
17. Conley, D. T. (2003). Understanding university success. Eugene, OR: Center for Educational Policy Research, University of Oregon.
18. Costa, V. (1995). When science is "another world": Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79(3), 313-333.
19. Crouch, C. H., Fagen, A. P., Callan, J. P., & Mazur, E. (2004). Classroom demonstrations: Learning tools or entertainment? American Journal of Physics, 72(6), 835-838.
20. Dimitrov, D. (1999). Gender differences in science achievement: Differential effect of ability, response format, and strands of learning outcomes. School Science & Mathematics, 99(8), 445-451.
21. Epstein, D. (1998). Real boys don't work: 'Underachievement', masculinity, and the harassment of 'sissies'. In D. Epstein, J. Elwood, V. Hey, & J. Maw (Eds.), Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
22. Forgione, P., Nohara, D., Welch, C., & Salganik, L. (2000). Secondary performance. The Science Teacher, 67(1), 60.
23. Fratt, L. (2002). Less is more: Trimming the overstuffed curriculum [Electronic Version]. District Administration, 38. Retrieved May 3, 2007, from http://districtadministration.ccsct.com//page.cfm?p=228.
24. Freeman, C. E. (2004). Trends in educational equity of girls & women: 2004. National Center for Education Statistics Report. Retrieved May 3, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2005016
25. Gainen, J. (1995). Barriers to success in quantitative gatekeeper courses. In J. Gainen & E. W. Williamsen (Eds.), Fostering student success in quantitative gateway courses (pp. 5-14). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26. Gifford, V. D., & Harpole, S. (1986). Factors contributing to freshmen physics achievement. Paper presented at the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Memphis, TN.
27. Gilbert, J., & Calvert, S. (2003). Challenging accepted wisdom: Looking at the gender and science education question through a different lens. International Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 861-878.
28. Gillibrand, E., Robinson, P., Brawn, R., & Osbom, A. (1999). Girls' participation in physics in single sex classes in mixed schools in relation to confidence and achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 349-362.
29. Hart, G. E., & Cottle, P. D. (1993). Academic backgrounds and achievement in college physics. The Physics Teacher, 31(8), 470-475.
30. Harwood, W. S., & McMahon, M. M. (1997). Effects of integrated video media on student achievement and attitudes in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 617-631.
31. Haussler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2002). An intervention study to enhance girls' interest, self-concept and achievement in physics classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 870-888.
32. Hazari, Z., & Potvin, G. (2005). Views on female under-representation in physics: Retraining women or reinventing physics? Electronic Journal of Science Education, 10(1), 1-33. Retrieved May 3, 2007, from http://wolfweb.unr. edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/ejsev10n1.html.
33. Hazel, E., Logan, P., & Gallagher, P. (1997). Equitable assessment of students in physics: Importance of gender and language background. International Journal of Science Education, 19(4), 381-392.
34. Heller, P., & Hollabaugh, M. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping, Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 637-644.
35. Hughes, G. (2001). Exploring the availability of student scientist identities within curriculum discourse. Gender & Education, 13(3), 275-290.
36. Ivie, R., Cuzjko, R., & Stowe, K. (2001). Women physicists speak: The 2001 International Study of Women in Physics. American Institute of Physics Report. Retrieved May 3, 2007, from http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/ gendertrends.html
37. Jackson, C. (2002). 'Laddishness' as a self-worth protection strategy. Gender & Education, 14(1), 37-51.
38. Jones, G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. (2000). Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84(2), 180-192.
39. Kenway, J., & Gough, A. (1998). Gender and science education in schools: A review "with attitude." Studies in Science Education, 31(1), 1-30.
40. Kulik, J. A. (2002). School mathematics and science programs benefit from instructional technology. InfoBrief: Science Resource Statistics. Retrieved May 3, 2007, from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf03301/
41. Labudde, P., Herzog, W., Neuenschwander, M., Violi, E., & Gerber, C. (2000). Girls and physics: Teaching and learning strategies tested by classroom interventions in grade 11. International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 143-157.
42. Laws, P., Rosborough, P., & Poodry, F. (1999). Women's responses to an activity-based introductory physics program. American Journal of Physics, 67(7), S32-S37.
43. Lederman, M. (2003). Gender/InEquity in science education: A response. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), 604-606.
44. Leonard, D. K., & Jiang, J. (1999). Gender bias and the college prediction of the SATs: A cry of despair. Research in Higher Education, 40(4), 375-408.
45. Lie, S., & Bryhni, E. (1983). Girls and physics: Attitudes, experiences and underachievement. Paper presented at the Second GASAT Conference, London.
46. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
47. Long, D. D., McLaughlin, G. W., & Bloom, A. M. (1986). The influence of physics laboratories on student performance in a lecture course. American Journal of Physics, 54(2), 122-125.
48. Marshall, J. A., & Dorward, J. T. (2000). Inquiry experiences as a lecture supplement for preservice elementary teachers and general education students. American Journal of Physics, 68(S1), S27-S36.
49. Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
50. McCullough, L. (2004). Gender, context, and physics assessment. Journal of International Women's Studies, 5(4), 20-30.
51. Monk, M., & Osborne, J. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: A model for the development of pedagogy. Science Education, 81(4), 405-424.
52. Morgan, C., Isaac, J. D., & Sansone, C. (2001). The role of interest in understanding the career choices of female and male college students. Sex Roles, 44(5/6), 295-320.
53. Musheno, B. V., & Lawson, A. E. (1999). Effects of learning cycle and traditional text on comprehension of science concepts by students at differing reasoning levels. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 23-37.
54. Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion: Space, time, and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. London: Falmer Press.
55. Nord, C. W., Brimhall, D., & West, J. (1997). Fathers' involvement in their children's schools. National Center for Educational Statistics Report. Retrieved May 3, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/fathers
56. Parker, L., & Rennie, L. (2002). Teachers' implementation of gender-inclusive instructional strategies in single-sex and mixed-sex science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 24(9), 881-897.
57. Perkins, R. (2001). The father-daughter relationship: Familial interactions that impact a daughter's style of life. College Student Journal, 35(4), 616-626.
58. Rakow, S. J. (1999). NSTA's response to the TIMSS. The Science Teacher, 66(1), 30-33.
59. Redish, E. F., Saul, J. M., & Steinberg, R. N. (1997). On the effectiveness of active-engagement micro-computer based laboratories. American Journal of Physics, 65(1), 45-54.
60. Rivard, L. P., & Straw, S. B. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 84(5), 566-593.
61. Roth, W. M., McRobbie, C. J., Lucas, K. B., & Boutonné, S. (1997). Why may students fail to learn from demonstrations? A social practice perspective on learning in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(5), 509-533.
62. Roychoudhury, A., Tippins, D., & Nichols, S. (1995). Gender-inclusive science teaching: A feminist-constructivist approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(9), 897-924.
63. Rudge, D. W., & Howe, E. M. (2004). Incorporating history into the science classroom. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 52-57.
64. Sadler, P. M., & Tai, R. H. (2001). Success in introductory college physics: The role of high school preparation. Science Education, 85(2), 111 -136.
65. Scheffer, J. (2002). Dealing with missing data. Research Letters in the Information and Mathematical Sciences, 3(1), 153-160.
66. Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2002). Performance of students in project-based science classrooms on a national measure of science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(5), 410-422.
67. Scott, A. B., & Mallinckrodt, B. (2005). Parental emotional support, science self-efficacy, and choice of science major in undergraduate women. The Career Development Quarterly,53(3), 263-273.
68. Secunda, V. (1992). Women and their fathers. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell.
69. Seymour, E. (2001). Tracking the processes of change in US undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Science Education, 86(1), 79-105.
70. Shumba, O., & Glass, L. W. (1994). Perceptions of coordinators of college freshman chemistry regarding selected goals and outcomes of high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(4), 381-392.
71. Singer, S. R., Hilton, M. L., & Schweingruber, H. A. (Eds.). (2006). America's lab report: Investigations in high school science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
72. Smith, F. M., & Hausafus, C. O. (1998). Relationship of family support and ethnic minority students' achievement in science and mathematics. Science Education, 82(1), 111 -125.
73. Snyder, T. D., Tan, A. G., & Hoffman, C. M. (2004). Digest of educational statistics, 2003. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
74. Sommers, C. H. (2000). The war against boys. The Atlantic Monthly, 285(5), 59-74.
75. Stadler, H., Duit, R., & Benke, G. (2000). Do boys and girls understand physics differently? Physics Education, 35(6), 417-422.
76. Tai, R. H., & Sadler, P. M. (2001). Gender differences in introductory undergraduate physics performance: University physics versus college physics in the USA. International Journal of Science Education, 23(10), 1017-1037.
77. Tai, R. H., Sadler, P. M., & Loehr, J. F. (2005). Factors influencing success in introductory college chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(9), 987-1012.
78. Urry, M. (2003). Speeding up the long slow path to change. APS News, 12(2).
79. Wainer, H., & Steinberg, L. S. (1992). Sex differences in performance on the math section of the SAT: A bidirectional validity study. Harvard Educational Review, 62(3), 323-336.
80. Wallsgrove, R. (1980). The masculine face of science. In L. Birke, W. Faulkner, D. Best, D. Janson-Smith, & K. Overfield (Eds.), Alice through the microscope (pp. 228-240). London: Virago.
81. Wertheim, M. (1995). Pythagoras' trousers: God, physics, and the gender wars. New York: Times Books/Random House.
82. Williams, K. (2000/2001). Understanding, communication anxiety and gender in physics. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30(4), 232-237.
83. Xu, J. (2006). Gender and homework management reported by high school students. Educational Psychology, 26(1), 73-91.
84. Zohar, A., & Sela, D. (2003). Her physics, his physics: Gender issues in Israeli advanced placement physics classes. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 245-268.