Depth cues, rather than perceived depth, govern vergence

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 184, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 61-70

  Wismeijer, D A ^a   Van Ee, R ^a   Erkelens, C J ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ambiguous; Depth perception; Disparity; Vergence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ATTENTION; CONVERGENCE, OCULAR; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FIXATION, OCULAR; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SACCADES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 35848962107     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1081-2     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allison RS, Howard IP, Rogers BJ, Bridge H (1998) Temporal aspects of slant and inclination perception. Perception 27(11):1287-1304
2. Banks MS, Hooge IT, Backus BT (2001) Perceiving slant about a horizontal axis from stereopsis. J Vis 1(2):55-79
3. Bernardis P, Knox P, Bruno N (2005) How does action resist visual illusion? Uncorrected oculomotor information does not account for accurate pointing in peripersonal space. Exp Brain Res 162(2):133-144
4. Both MH, van Ee R, Erkelens CJ (2003) Perceived slant from Werner's illusion affects binocular saccadic eye movements. J Vis 3(11):685-697
5. Bruno N (2001) When does action resist visual illusions? Trends Cogn Sci 5(9):379-382
6. Carey D (2001) Do action systems resist visual illusions? Trends Cogn Sci 5(3):109-113
7. Collewijn H, Erkelens CJ, Steinman RM (1988) Binocular co-ordination of human horizontal saccadic eye movements. J Physiol 404:157-182
8. de Grave DDJ, Franz VH, Gegenfurtner KR (2006a) The influence of the brentano illusion on eye and hand movements. J Vis 6(7):727-738
9. de Grave DDJ, Smeets JBJ, Brenner E (2006b) Why are saccades influenced by the brentano illusion? Exp Brain Res 175(1):177-182
10. Enright JT (1984) Changes in vergence mediated by saccades. J Physiol 350:9-31
11. Enright JT (1987a) Art and the oculomotor system: perspective illustrations evoke vergence changes. Perception 16(6):731-746
12. Enright JT (1987b) Perspective vergence: oculomotor responses to line drawings. Vision Res 27(9):1513-1526
13. Erkelens CJ, Collewijn H (1985) Eye movements and stereopsis during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms. Vision Res 25(11):1689-1700
14. Erkelens CJ, Steinman RM, Collewijn H (1989) Ocular vergence under natural conditions. ii. Gaze shifts between real targets differing in distance and direction. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 236(1285):441-465
15. Franz V (2001) Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends Cogn Sci 5(11):457-459
16. Franz VH, Gegenfurtner KR, Bulthoff HH, Fahle M (2000) Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychol Sci 11(1):20-25
17. Franz VH, Fahle M, Bulthoff HH, Gegenfurtner KR (2001) Effects of visual illusions on grasping. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27(5):1124-1144
18. Gillam BJ (1968) Perception of slant when perspective and stereopsis conflict: experiments with aniseikonic lenses. J Exp Psychol 78(2):299-305
19. Gillam B, Ryan C (1992) Perspective, orientation disparity, and anisotropy in stereoscopic slant perception. Perception 21(4):427-439
20. Gillam BJ, Cook ML (2001) Perspective based on stereopsis and occlusion. Psychol Sci 12(5):424-429
21. Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15(1):20-25
22. Goodale MA, Westwood DA (2004) An evolving view of duplex vision: separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 14(2):203-211
23. Haffenden AM, Goodale MA (2000) Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action. Vision Res 40(10-12):1597-1607
24. Haffenden AM, Schiff KC, Goodale MA (2001) The dissociation between perception and action in the ebbinghaus illusion: nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp. Curr Biol 11(3):177-181
25. Hoffmann J, Sebald A (2007) Eye vergence is susceptible to the hollow-face illusion. Perception 36(3):461-470
26. Howard IP (2002) Seeing in depth, Basic Mechanisms. I. Porteous, vol 1
27. Knapen T, van Ee R (2006) Slant perception, and its voluntary control, do not govern the slant aftereffect: multiple slant signals adapt independently. Vision Res 46(20):3381-3392
28. Knox P, Bruno N (2007) When does action resist visual illusion? The effect of Muller-Lyer stimuli on reflexive and voluntary saccades. Exp Brain Res 181(2):277-287
29. Lopez-Moliner J, Smeets JBJ, Brenner E (2003) Similar effects of a motion-in-depth illusion on manual tracking and perceptual judgements. Exp Brain Res 151(4):553-556
30. Masson GS, Busettini C, Miles FA (1997) Vergence eye movements in response to binocular disparity without depth perception. Nature 389(6648):283-286
31. Press W (1993) Numerical recipes for C. Cambridge University Press, London
32. Ringach DL, Hawken MJ, Shapley R (1996) Binocular eye movements caused by the perception of three-dimensional structure from motion. Vision Res 36(10):1479-1492
33. Schreiber K, Crawford JD, Fetter M, Tweed D (2001) The motor side of depth vision. Nature 410(6830):819-822
34. Sheliga BM, Miles FA (2003) Perception can influence the vergence responses associated with open-loop gaze shifts in 3d. J Vis 3(11):654-676
35. Smeets JBJ, Brenner E, de Grave DDJ, Cuijpers RH (2002) Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes. Exp Brain Res 147(2):135-144
36. Toppino TC (2003) Reversible-figure perception: mechanisms of intentional control. Percept Psychophys 65(8):1285-1295
37. van Beers RJ (2007) The sources of variability in saccadic eye movements. J Neurosci 27 (in press). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2311-07.2007
38. van Ee R, van Dam LCJ (2003) The influence of cyclovergence on unconstrained stereoscopic matching. Vision Res 43(3):307-319
39. van Ee R, Krumina G, Pont S, van der Ven S (2005a) Voluntarily controlled bi-stable slant perception of real and photographed surfaces. Proc Biol Sci 272(1559):141-148
40. van Ee R, van Dam LCJ, Brouwer GJ (2005b) Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision Res 45(1):41-55
41. van Ee R, van Dam LCJ, Erkelens CJ (2002) Bi-stability in perceived slant when binocular disparity and monocular perspective specify different slants. J Vis 2(9):597-607