Slant perception, and its voluntary control, do not govern the slant aftereffect: Multiple slant signals adapt independently

Vision Research

Volumn 46, Issue 20, 2006, Pages 3381-3392

  Knapen, Tomas ^a   van Ee, Raymond ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Binocular vision; Bistability; Slant aftereffect; Slant perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE POSITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SURFACE PROPERTY; VISION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 33746287476     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.027     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adams W.J., Banks M.S., and van Ee R. Adaptation to three-dimensional distortions in human vision. Nature Neuroscience 4 11 (2001) 1063-1064
2. Balch W., Milewski A., and Yonas A. Mechanisms underlying the slant aftereffect. Perception and Psychophysics 21 6 (1977) 581-585
3. Berends E.M., Liu B., and Schor C.M. Stereo-slant adaptation is high level and does not involve disparity coding. Journal of Vision 5 1 (2005) 71-80
4. Bergman R.G., and Gibson J.J. The negative after-effect of the perception of a surface slanted in the third dimension. American Journal of Psychology 72 (1959) 364-374
5. Blake R., and Logothetis N.K. Visual competition. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 3 1 (2002) 13-21
6. Blake R., Yu K., Lokey M., and Norman H. Binocular rivalry and motion perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 1 (1998) 46-60
7. Brouwer G.J., van Ee R., and Schwarzbach J. Activation in visual cortex correlates with the awareness of stereoscopic depth. Journal of Neuroscience 25 45 (2005) 10403-10413
8. Chaudhuri A. Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention. Nature 344 6261 (1990) 60-62
9. Culham J.C., Verstraten F.A., Ashida H., and Cavanagh P. Independent aftereffects of attention and motion. Neuron 28 2 (2000) 607-615
10. Domini F., Adams W., and Banks M.S. 3D after-effects are due to shape and not disparity adaptation. Vision Research 41 21 (2001) 2733-2739
11. Epstein W., and Morgan-Paap C.L. Aftereffect of inspection of a perspectival stimulus for slant depth: a new normalization effect. Perception and Psychophysics 16 (1974) 299-302
12. Graham M., and Rogers B. Simultaneous and successive contrast effects in the perception of depth from motion-parallax and stereoscopic information. Perception 11 3 (1982) 247-262
13. Janssen P., Vogels R., Liu Y., and Orban G.A. Macaque inferior temporal neurons are selective for three-dimensional boundaries and surfaces. Journal of Neuroscience 21 23 (2001) 9419-9429
14. Janssen P., Vogels R., and Orban G.A. Macaque inferior temporal neurons are selective for disparity-defined three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences the United States of America 96 14 (1999) 8217-8222
15. Janssen P., Vogels R., and Orban G.A. Three-dimensional shape coding in inferior temporal cortex. Neuron 27 2 (2000) 385-397
16. Köhler W., and Emery D.A. Figural after-effects in the third dimension of visual space. American Journal of Psychology 60 (1947) 159-201
17. Leopold D.A., Wilke M., Maier A., and Logothetis N.K. Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience 5 6 (2002) 605-609
18. Liu Y., Vogels R., and Orban G.A. Convergence of depth from texture and depth from disparity in macaque inferior temporal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 24 15 (2004) 3795-3800
19. Maier A., Wilke M., Logothetis N.K., and Leopold D.A. Perception of temporally interleaved ambiguous patterns. Current Biology 13 13 (2003) 1076-1085
20. McAdams C.J., and Maunsell J.H. Effects of attention on orientation-tuning functions of single neurons in macaque cortical area V4. Journal of Neuroscience 19 1 (1999) 431-441
21. Meng M., and Tong F. Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision 4 7 (2004) 539-551
22. Montaser-Kouhsari L., and Rajimehr R. Attentional modulation of adaptation to illusory lines. Journal of Vision 4 6 (2004) 434-444
23. O'Shea R.P., and Crassini B. Interocular transfer of the motion after-effect is not reduced by binocular rivalry. Vision Research 21 6 (1981) 801-804
24. Orbach J., Ehrlich D., and Vainstein E. Reversibility of the necker cube: III. Effects of interpolation on reversal rate of the cube presented repetitively. Perceptual and Motor Skills 17 (1963) 571-582
25. Poom L., and Borjesson E. Perceptual depth synthesis in the visual system as revealed by selective adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 25 2 (1999) 504-517
26. Reynolds J.H., and Chelazzi L. Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience 27 (2004) 611-647
27. Rezec A., Krekelberg B., and Dobkins K.R. Attention enhances adaptability: evidence from motion adaptation experiments. Vision Research 44 26 (2004) 3035-3044
28. Rose D., Bradshaw M.F., and Hibbard P.B. Attention affects the stereoscopic depth aftereffect. Perception 32 5 (2003) 635-640
29. Ryan C., and Gillam B. A proximity-contingent stereoscopic depth aftereffect: evidence for adaptation to disparity gradients. Perception 22 4 (1993) 403-418
30. Taya S., Sato M., and Nakamizo S. Stereoscopic depth aftereffects without retinal position correspondence between adaptation and test stimuli. Vision Research 45 14 (2005) 1857-1866
31. Tsutsui K., Jiang M., Yara K., Sakata H., and Taira M. Integration of perspective and disparity cues in surface-orientation-selective neurons of area CIP. Journal of Neurophysiology 86 6 (2001) 2856-2867
32. Tsutsui K., Sakata H., Naganuma T., and Taira M. Neural correlates for perception of 3D surface orientation from texture gradient. Science 5592 (2002) 409-412
33. Tsutsui K., Taira M., and Sakata H. Neural mechanisms of three-dimensional vision. Neuroscience Research 51 3 (2005) 221-229
34. van Dam L.C., and van Ee R. The role of (micro)saccades and blinks in perceptual bi-stability from slant rivalry. Vision Research 45 18 (2005) 2417-2435
35. van Dam L.C., and van Ee R. The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry. Vision Research 46 6-7 (2006) 787-799
36. van Ee R. Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry. Vision Research 45 1 (2005) 29-40
37. van Ee R., and Anderson B.L. Motion direction, speed and orientation in binocular matching. Nature 410 6829 (2001) 690-694
38. Van Ee R., and Erkelens C.J. Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception. Vision Research 36 1 (1996) 43-51
39. van Ee R., van Dam L.C., and Brouwer G.J. Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision Research 45 1 (2005) 41-55
40. van Ee R., van Dam L.C., and Erkelens C.J. Bi-stability in perceived slant when binocular disparity and monocular perspective specify different slants. Journal of Vision 2 9 (2002) 597-607
41. Wade N.J., and Wenderoth P. The influence of colour and contour rivalry on the magnitude of the tilt after-effect. Vision Research 18 7 (1978) 827-835
42. Welchman A.E., Deubelius A., Conrad V., Bulthoff H.H., and Kourtzi Z. 3D shape perception from combined depth cues in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience 8 6 (2005) 820-827
43. Wenderoth P. A visual spatial aftereffect of surface slant. American Journal of Psychology 83 4 (1970) 576-590
44. Wiesenfelder H., and Blake R. The neural site of binocular rivalry relative to the analysis of motion in the human visual system. Journal of Neuroscience 10 12 (1990) 3880-3888
45. Wiesenfelder H., and Blake R. Binocular rivalry suppression disrupts recovery from motion adaptation. Vision Neuroscience 9 2 (1992) 143-148
46. Wolfe J.M. Afterimages, binocular rivalry, and the temporal properties of dominance and suppression. Perception 12 4 (1983) 439-445