The influence of cyclovergence on unconstrained stereoscopic matching

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 307-319

  Van Ee, Raymond ^a   Van Dam, Loes C J ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Binocular correspondence; Binocular vision; Disparity; Matching; Stereopsis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LINE DIFFERENCE; MEASUREMENT; OPTOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISION; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RETINA; ROTATION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 0037300348     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00496-0     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adams, W. J. (1998). The role of vertical disparities in human stereo vision. University of Sheffield.
2. Adams W.J., Banks M.S. Position of preferred matches is determined by viewing geometry. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 41:2000;S733.
3. Anderson B.L. The role of partial occlusion in stereopsis. Nature. 367:1994;365-368.
4. Anderson B.L. Putting plaids in perspective. Nature. 401:1999;342-343.
5. Arditi A., Kaufman L., Movshon J.A. A simple explanation of the induced size effect. Vision Research. 21:1981;755-764.
6. Backus B.T., Banks M.S., van Ee R., Crowell J.A. Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception. Vision Research. 39:1999;1143-1170.
7. Banks M.S., Hooge I.T.C., Backus B.T. Perceiving slant about a horizontal axis from stereopsis. Journal of Vision. 1:2001;55-79.
8. Blake R., Camisa J.M., Antoinetti D.N. Binocular depth discrimination depends on orientation. Perception & Psychophysics. 20:1976;113-118.
9. Collewijn H., van der Steen J., van Rijn L.J. Binocular eye movements and depth perception. Gorea A. Representations of vision, trends and tacit assumptions in vision research. 1991;165-183 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. Crone R.A., Everhard-Halm Y. Optically induced eye torsion. Albrecht von Graefes Archives of Clinical Experimental Ophthalmology. 195:1975;231-239.
11. Deriche R., Zhang Z., Luong Q.T., Faugeras O. Robust recovery of the epipolar geometry for an uncalibrated stereo rig. Eklundh J.O. Lecture Notes in Computer Science-ECCV' 94. 1994;567-576.
12. Ebenholtz S.M., Walchli R. Stereoscopic thresholds as a function of head- and object-orientation. Vision Research. 5:1965;455-461.
13. Enright J.T. Stereopsis, cyclotorsional "noise" and the apparent vertical. Vision Research. 30:1990;1487-1497.
14. Erkelens C.J., van Ee R. A computational model of depth perception based on headcentric disparity. Vision Research. 38:1998;2999-3018.
15. Farell B. Two-dimensional matches from one-dimensional stimulus components in stereopsis. Nature. 395:1998;689-693.
16. Faugeras O. Three dimensional computer vision. 1993;The MIT Press, Cambridge.
17. Hillis J.M., Banks M.S. Are corresponding points fixed? Vision Research. 41:2001;2457-2473.
18. Hofmann F.B., Bielschowsky A. Ueber die Willkuer entzogenen Fusionbewegungen der Augen. Pfluegers Archiv fuer die gesamte Physiologie. 80:1900;1-40.
19. Howard I.P., Zacher J.E. Human cyclovergence as a function of stimulus frequency and amplitude. Experimental Brain Research. 85:1991;445-450.
20. Howard I.P., Ohmi M., Sun L. Cyclovergence: a comparison of objective and psychophysical measurements. Experimental Brain Research. 97:1993;349-355.
21. Howard I.P., Sun L., Shen X. Cycloversion and cyclovergence: the effects of the area and position of the visual display. Experimental Brain Research. 100:1994;509-514.
22. Howard I.P., Rogers B.J. Depth perception. 2002;I. Porteous, Toronto.
23. Julesz B. Foundations of cyclopean perception. 1971;University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
24. Kertesz A.E., Sullivan M.J. The effect of stimulus size on human cyclofusional response. Vision Research. 18:1978;567-571.
25. Koenderink J.J. Fundamentals of bicentric perspective. Bensoussan A., Verjus J.P. Future tendencies in computer science, control and applied mathematics. 1992;233-251 Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
26. Malik J., Anderson B.L., Charowhas C.E. Stereoscopic occlusion junctions. Nature Neuroscience. 2:1999;840-843.
27. Mitchison G.J., McKee S.P. Interpolation in stereoscopic matching. Nature. 315:1985;402-404.
28. Morgan M.J., Castet E. The aperture problem in stereopsis. Vision Research. 37:1997;2737-2744.
29. Nagel A. Ueber das Vorkommen von wahren Rollungen des Auges um die Gesichtslinie. Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fuer Ophthalmologie. 14:1868;228-246.
30. Nielsen K.R.K., Poggio T. Vertical image registration in stereopsis. Vision Research. 24:1984;1133-1140.
31. Ogle K.N., Ellerbrock V.J. Cyclofusional movements. AMA Archives of Ophthalmology. 36:1946;700-735.
32. Ogle K.N. Researches in binocular vision. 1950;Saunders, Philadelphia.
33. Prazdny K. Stereoscopic matching, eye position, and absolute depth. Perception. 12:1983;151-160.
34. Prazdny K. Vertical disparity tolerance in random-dot stereograms. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 23:1985;413-414.
35. Prazdny K. Vertical disparity nulling in random-dot stereograms. Biological Cybernetics. 56:1987;61-67.
36. Richards W. Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 61:1971;410-419.
37. Richards W. Response functions for sine- and square-wave modulations of disparity. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 62:1972;907-911.
38. Richards W., Kaye M.G. Local versus global stereopsis: two mechanisms? Vision Research. 14:1974;1345-1347.
39. Rogers B.J. The perception and representation of depth and slant in stereoscopic surfaces. Orban G., Nagel H. Artificial and biological vision systems. 1992;241-266 Springer, Berlin.
40. Rogers B.J., Bradshaw M.F. Disparity scaling and the perception of frontoparallel surfaces. Perception. 24:1995;155-179.
41. Rogers B.J., Bradshaw M.F. Does the visual system use the epipolar constraint for matching binocular images? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 37:1996;S3125.
42. Schor C.M., Tyler C.W. Spatio-temporal properties of panum's fusional area. Vision Research. 21:1980;683-692.
43. Schor C.M., Wood I., Ogawa J. Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution. Vision Research. 24:1984;661-665.
44. Schor C.M. Binocular vision. Devalois K. Seeing: handbook of perception and cognition. 1999;41-66 Academic Press, San Francisco.
45. Schreiber K., Crawford J.D., Fetter M., Tweed D. The motor side of depth vision. Nature. 410:2001;819-822.
46. Stevenson S.B., Schor C.M. Human stereo matching is not restricted to epipolar lines. Vision Research. 37:1997;2717-2723.
47. Sullivan M.J., Kertesz A.E. Binocular coordination of torsional eye movements in cyclofusional response. Vision Research. 18:1978;943-949.
48. Tyler C.W. Spatial organization of binocular disparity sensitivity. Vision Research. 15:1975;583-590.
49. Tyler C.W. Binocular moiréfringes and the vertical horopter. Perception. 9:1980;475-478.
50. van Ee R., Erkelens C.J. Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception. Vision Research. 36:1996a;43-51.
51. van Ee R., Erkelens C.J. Stability of binocular depth perception with moving head and eyes. Vision Research. 36:1996b;3827-3842.
52. van Ee R., Schor C.M. Unconstrained stereoscopic matching of lines. Vision Research. 40:2000;151-162.
53. van Ee R., Anderson B.L. Motion direction, speed, and orientation in binocular matching. Nature. 410:2001;690-694.
54. van Ee R., Anderson B.L., Farid H. Occlusion junctions do not improve stereoacuity. Spatial Vision. 15(1):2001;45-59.
55. van Ee, R. (in press). Correlation between stereoanomaly and perceived depth when disparity and motion interact in binocular matching. Perception.
56. van Ee R., Richards W. A planar and a volumetric test for stereoanomaly. Perception. 31:2002;51-64.
57. van Rijn L.J., van der Steen J., Collewijn H. Instability of ocular torsion during fixation; cyclovergence is more stable than cycloversion. Vision Research. 34:1994;1077-1087.
58. Verhoeff F.H. Cycloduction. Transactions of the American Ophthalmology Society. 32:1934;208-228.