Voluntarily controlled bi-stable slant perception of real and photographed surfaces

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 272, Issue 1559, 2005, Pages 141-148

  Van Ee, Raymond ^a,c   Krumina, Gunta ^b   Pont, Sylvia ^a   Van Der Ven, Sanne ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA   (Latvia)

^c Physics of Man   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Perceived surface orientation; Perceptual bi stability; Pictorial space; Reverse perspective; Voluntary control

Indexed keywords

PERCEPTION; VISION;

ARTICLE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; BINOCULAR VISION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

HUMANS; PHOTOGRAPHY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 17044368378     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2896     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ames, A. 1951 Visual perception and the rotating trapezoidal window. Psychol. Monogr. Gen. Appl. 65, 1-31.
2. Blake, R. & Logothetis, N. K. 2002 Visual competition. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 3, 1-11.
3. Clark, W. C., Smith, A. H. & Rabe, A. 1956 The interaction of surface texture, outline gradient, and ground in the perception of slant. Can. J. Psychol. 10, 1-8.
4. Cook, N. D., Hayashi, T., Amemiya, T., Suzuki, K. & Leumann, L. 2002 Effects of visual-field inversions on the reverse-perspective illusion. Perception 31, 1147-1151.
5. Ellis, S. R., Kaiser, M. K. & Grunwald, A. C.(eds) 1991 Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments. London: Taylor & Francis.
6. Frisby, J. P., Buckley, D. & Horsman, J. M. 1995 Integration of stereo, texture, and outline cues during pinhole viewing of real ridge-shaped objects and stereograms of ridges. Perception 24, 181-198.
7. Gillam, B. J. 1968 Perception of slant when perspective and stereopsis conflict: experiments with aniseikonic lenses. J. Exp. Psychol. 78, 299-305.
8. Gillam, B. J. & Cook, M. L. 2001 Perspective based on stereopsis and occlusion. Psychol. Sci. 12, 424-429.
9. Harwerth, R. S., Möller, M. C. & Wensveen, J. M. 1998 Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues. Optom. Vision Sci. 75, 433-444.
10. Hecht, H., van Doorn, A. J. & Koenderink, J. J. 1999 Compression of visual space in natural scenes and in their photographic counterparts. Percept. Psychophys. 61, 1269-1286.
11. Howard, I. P. & Rogers, B. J. 2002 Seeing in depth vol 2: depth perception. Toronto: I. Porteous.
12. Koenderink, J. J. & Van Doorn, A. J. 2003 Pictorial space. In Looking into pictures: an interdisciplinary approach to pictorial space (ed. H. Hecht, R. Schwartz & M. Atherton, pp. 239-403.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Kubovy, M. 1986 The psychology of perspective and Renaissance art. Cambridge University Press.
14. Mach, E. 1866 Über die physiologische Wirkung räumlich verteilter Lichtreize. Sitzungsb. Wiener Akad. 54, 3.
15. Papathomas, T. V. 2000 See how they turn: false depth and motion in Hughes' reverspectives. Hum. Vision Electr. Imag. V, SPIE Proc. Ser. 3959, 506-517.
16. Papathomas, T. V. 2002 Experiments on the role of painted cues in Hughes's reverspectives. Perception 31, 521-530.
17. Reinhardt-Rutland, A. H. 1990 Detecting orientation of a surface: the rectangularity postulate and primary depth cues. J. Gen. Psychol. 117, 391-401.
18. Rosinski, R. R., Mulholland, T., Degelman, D. & Farber, J. 1980 Picture perception: an analysis of visual compensation. Percept. Psychophys. 28, 521-526.
19. Schriever, W. 1925 Experimentelle Studien über stereoskopisches Sehen. Zeitschr. Psycholo. Physiol. Sinnesorgane 96, 113-170.
20. Slyce, J. 1998 Patrick Hughes: perverspective. London: Momentum.
21. van Doom, A. J., Koenderink, J. J. & de Ridder, H. 2001 Pictorial space correspondence in photographs of an object in different poses. In Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VI: Proc. Soc. Photo-Optical Instr. Eng., vol. 4299 (ed. B. E. Rogowitz & T. N. Pappas) pp. 321-329. Washington, DC: SPIE.
22. van Ee, R. 2005 Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, houseface, and Necker cube rivalry. Vision Res. 45, 29-40.
23. van Ee, R. & Richards, W. 2002 A planar and a volumetric test for stereoanomaly. Perception 31, 51-64.
24. van Ee, R., Banks, M. S. & Backus, B. T. 1999 An analysis of binocular slant contrast. Perception 28, 1121-1145.
25. van Ee, R., van Dam, L. C. J. & Erkelens, C. J. 2002 Bi-stability in perceived slant when binocular disparity and monocular perspective specify different slants. J. Vision 2, 597-607.
26. van Ee, R., Adams, W. J. & Mamassian, P. 2003 Bayesian modelling of perceived slant in bi-stable stereoscopic perception. J. Optic. Soc. Am. 20, 1398-1406.
27. van Ee, R., van Dam, L. C. J. & Brouwer, G. J. 2005 Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision Res. 45, 41-55.
28. Wade, N. J. & Hughes, P. 1999 Fooling the eyes: trompe l'oeil and reverse perspective. Perception 28, 1115-1119.
29. Werner, H. 1937 Dynamical theory of depth perception. Psychol. Monogr. 49, 1-127.
30. Yellott, J. I. & Kaiwi, J. L. 1979 Depth inversion despite stereopsis: the appearance of random-dot stereograms on surfaces seen in reverse perspective. Perception 8, 135-142.