Electronic democracy and young people

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 43-54

  Macintosh, Ann ^a   Robson, Edmund ^a   Smith, Ella ^a   Whyte, Angus ^a  

^a EDINBURGH NAPIER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Citizenship; E consultation; E democracy; Young people

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037273417     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894439302238970     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barber, B. (1985). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2. Bentley, T., & Oakley, K. (1999). The real deal: What young people really think about government, politics and social exclusion. London: Demos.
3. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives; The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
4. Center for Media Education. (2001). A field guide to the new digital landscape. Retrieved July 2002, from http://www.cme.org/teenstudy/
5. Coleman, S., & Gøtze, J. (2001). Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation. Retrieved July 2000, from http://bowlingtogether.net/intro.html
6. Gayeski, D. M. (1997). Predicting the success of new media for organizational learning: How can we avoid costly mistakes? Educational Technology, 57(6), 5-13.
7. Hagen, M. (2000). Digital democracy and political systems. In K. Hacker & J. van Dijk (Eds.), Digital democracy: Issues of theory and practice (pp. 54-69). London: Sage.
8. Kapor, M. (1996). A software design manifesto. In T. Winograd, J. Bennet, L. De Young, S. Gordon, & B. Hartfield (Eds.), Bringing design to software (pp. 1-10). New York: Addison-Wesley.
9. Kurosu, M., & Kashimura, K. (1995). Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: Experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability. In CHI '95 conference companion (pp. 292-293). New York: ACM.
10. Laurel, B. K. (1986). Interface as mimesis. In D. A. Norman & S. W. Draper (Eds.), User centered system design (pp. 67-68). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Liddle, D. (1996). Design of the conceptual model. In T. Winograd, J. Bennet, L. De Young, S. Gordon, & B. Hartfield (Eds.), Bringing design to software (pp. 17-32). New York: Addison-Wesley.
12. Light, A., & Wakeman, I. (2001). Beyond the interface: Users' perceptions of interaction and audience on websites. Interacting With Computers, 12(3), 325-351.
13. Livingstone, S., & Bovill, M. (1999). Young people, new media. London: London School of Economics.
14. Macintosh, A., Davenport, E., Malina, A., & Whyte, A. (2002). Technology to support participatory democracy. In Å. Grönlund (Ed.), Electronic government: Design, applications, and management (pp. 226-248). London: Idea Group.
15. Mathews, H., & Limb, M. (1999). Defining an agenda for the geography of children: Review and prospect. Progress in Human Geography, 23(1), 61-90.
16. Patrick, J. (1995). Civic education for constitutional democracy: An international perspective (ERIC Digest ED390781). Retrieved July 2002, from http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed390781.html
17. Rafaeli, S. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4). Retrieved July 2002, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/rafaeli.sudweeks.html
18. Scottish Executive Media and Communications Group. (2001). IT in schools 2000 survey (Scotland). Retrieved July 2002, from http://www.Scotland.gov.uk/stats/bulletins/00128-00.asp
19. Smith, E., Macintosh, A., & Whyte, A. (2002). Invisibility vs transparency. In Proceedings, Volume 2 of the 16th British HCI Conference London, September 2002 (pp. 166-170). London: Springer-Verlag.
20. Tractinsky, N., Katz, A., & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting With Computers, 13(2), 127-147.
21. Tudhope, D., Benyon-Davies, P., & Mackay, H. (2000). Prototyping praxis. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(4), 353-383.
22. United Kingdom Cabinet Office. (2002). In the service of democracy: A consultation paper on a policy for electronic democracy. Retrieved from http://www.edemocraoy.gov.uk
23. White, C., Bruce, S., & Ritchie, J. (2000). Young people's politics: Political interest and engagement amongst 14- to 24-year-olds. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
24. Wilhelm, A. (1999). Virtual sounding boards: How deliberative is online political discussion. In B. Hague & B. Loader (Eds.), Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age (pp. 154-179). London: Routledge.