Online consultation: E-Democracy and E-Resistance in the Case of the Development Gateway

Management Communication Quarterly

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 120-145

  Hardy, Cynthia ^b   Harley, Bill ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

e democracy; online consultation; power; resistance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990396332     PISSN: 08933189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0893318905276562     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. A. (1998). The power of resistance: Sustaining valued identities. In R. M. Kramer & M. A. Neale (Eds.), Power and influence in organizations (pp. 89-120). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). The two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56, 947-952.
3. Barbalet, J. M. (1985). Power and resistance. British Journal of Sociology, 36, 531-548.
4. Bimber, B. (1999). The Internet and citizen communication with government: Does the medium matter? Political Communication, 16, 409-428.
5. Browning, G. (1996). Electronic democracy: Using the Internet to influence politics. Wilton, CT: Online Inc.
6. Cairncross, F. (2001). The death of distance: How the communications revolution is changing our lives. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
7. Castells, M. (2001). The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Chadwick, A. (2003). Bringing e-democracy back in: Why it matters for future research on e-governance. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 443-455.
9. Chen, W., Boase, J., & Wellman, B. (2002). The global villagers: Comparing Internet users and uses around the world. In E. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 74-114). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
10. DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Newman, R., & Robinson, J. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 307-336.
11. Dutton, W. H. (1999). Society on the line: Information politics in the digital age. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Ebo, B. (1998). Internet or outernet? In B. Ebo (Ed.), Cyberghetto or cybertopia? Race, class, and gender on the Internet (pp. 1-14). Westport, CT: Praeger.
13. Electronic Development Centre. (2001, February). Final report: Global Knowledge for Development Forum on the Global Development Gateway. Retreived from www.edc.org/GLG/GDreport/final.htm
14. Etzioni, A. (1997). Communities: Virtual vs. real. Science, 277, 295.
15. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings by Michel Foucault (C. Gorden, Ed.). New York: Pantheon Books.
16. Graber, D. (2003). The media and democracy: Beyond myths and stereotypes. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 139-160.
17. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon.
18. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Hall, M. (1999). Virtual colonization. Journal of Material Culture, 4, 39-55.
20. Hardy, C. (1985). The nature of unobtrusive power. Journal of Management Studies, 22, 384-399.
21. Hardy, C., & Clegg, S. (1996). Some dare call it power. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 622-641). London: Sage.
22. Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2004). Discourse and power. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), Handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 299-316). London: Sage.
23. Harnessing knowledge and technology for sustainable development and poverty reduction [Project Proposal Draft]. (2000, June 19). Retreived from www.developmentgateway.org.
24. Ho, K. C., Baber, L., & Khondker, H. (2002). “Sites” of resistance: Alternative websites and state-society relations. British Journal of Sociology, 53, 127-148.
25. Hogan, J., & Greene, A. M. (2002). E-collectivism: On-line action and on-line mobilisation. In L. Holmes & M. Grieco (Eds.), Organising in the information age: Distributed technology, distributed action, distributed identity, distributed discourse (pp. 57-79). Ashgate, UK: Gower.
26. Hurwitz, R. (1999). Who needs politics? Who needs people? The ironies of democracy in cyberspace. Contemporary Sociology, 28, 655-661.
27. Jones, S. (1995). Cybersociety: Computer mediated communication and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Kampen, J. K., & Snijkers, K. (2003). E-democracy: A critical evaluation of the ultimate e-dream. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 491-496.
29. Kavanaugh, A., & Patterson, S. (2002). The impact of community computer networks on social capital in Blacksburg. In E. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 325-344). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
30. Klijn, E. H., & Kopperjan, J. F. M. (2000). Politicians and interactive decision making: Institutional spoilsports or playmakers. Public Administration, 78, 365-387.
31. Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (1995). The sociology of cyberspace: Social interaction and order in computer communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
32. Leadbetter, C. (1999) Living on thin air: The new economy. London: Viking.
33. Levin, Y. (2002, Fall). Politics after the Internet. Public Interest, 149, 80-94.
34. Lim, M. (2002). Cyber-civic space in Indonesia: From panopticon to pandemonium? International Development Planning Review, 24, 383-400.
35. Loader, B. (1997). The governance of cyberspace: Politics, technology and global restructuring. In B. Loader (Ed.), The governance of cyberspace: Politics, technology and global restructuring (pp. 1-19). London: Routledge.
36. May, C. (2002). The information society: A sceptical view. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
37. Murphy, A. G. (1998). Hidden transcripts of flight attendant resistance. Management Communication Quarterly, 11, 499-535.
38. Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
39. Nye, J. S. J., Zelikow, P. D., & King, D. D. (1997). Why people don’t trust government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Offe, C. (1984, March). Societal preconditions of corporatism and some current dilemmas of democratic theory (Working Paper 14). Notre Dame, IN: Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame.
41. Peled, A. (2001). Centralization or diffusion? Two tales of on line government. Administration and Society, 32, 686-709.
42. Pile, S. (1997). Introduction: Opposition, political identities and spaces of resistance. In S. Pile & M. Keith (Eds.), Geographies of resistance (pp. 1-32). London, New York: Routledge.
43. Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Knopf.
44. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
45. Quan-Hase, A., Wellman, B., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2002). Capitalizing on the net: Social contact, civic engagement, and sense of community. In E. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 291-332). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
46. Ramsay, H. (1977). Cycles of control: Worker participation in sociological and historical perspective. Sociology, 11(3), 481-506.
47. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
48. Resnick, D. (1998). Politics on the Internet: The normalization of cyberspace. In C. Toulouse & T. W. Luke (Eds.), The politics of cyberspace (pp. 48-68). New York, London: Routledge.
49. Schattschneider, E. F. (1960). The semi-sovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
50. Simon, L., Corrales, J., & Wolfensberger, D. (2002). Democracy and the Internet: Allies or adversaries? (L. Simon, Ed.). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Centre Press.
51. Steyaert, J. (2000). Local governments on line and the role of the resident: Government shop versus electronic community. Social Science Computer Review, 18, 3-16.
52. Stohl, C., & Cheney, G. (2001). Participatory processes/paradoxical practices. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 349-407.
53. Streck, J. (1998). Pulling the plug on electronic town meetings: Participatory democracy and the reality of the usenet. In C. Toulouse & T. W. Luke (Eds.), The politics of cyberspace (pp. 18-47). New York, London: Routledge.
54. Toulouse, C. (1998). Introduction to the politics of cyberspace. In C. Toulouse & T. W. Luke (Eds.), The politics of cyberspace (pp. 1-17). New York, London: Routledge.
55. Warf, B., & Grimes, J. (1997). Counterhegemonic discourses and the Internet. Geographical Review, 87, 259-274.
56. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (2 vols., G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
57. Wellman, E., & Haythornthwaite, C. (Eds.). (2002). The Internet in everyday life. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
58. Wendt, R. F. (1998). The sound of on e hand clapping: Counterintuitive lessons extracted from paradoxes and double binds in participative organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 11, 323-371.
59. Wilks, A. (2001, September). Development through the looking glass: The knowledge bank in cyber-space. Paper presented at the 6th Oxford Conference on Education and Development, Knowledge Values, and Policy. Available at www.brettonwoodsproject.org/topic/knowledgebank/gateway/lookglass.doc
60. Wood, A., & Smith, M. (2001). On-line communication: Linking technology, identity and culture. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61. Wright Mills, C. (1956). The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
62. Wrong, D. (1979). Power: Its forms, bases and uses. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
63. Yang, K. (2003). Neoinstitutionalism and e-government: Beyond Jane Fountain. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 432-442.