Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation

Political Behavior

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 183-216

  Best, Samuel J ^a   Krueger, Brian S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Internet; Political participation; Political representation; Public opinion; Resource theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 18844447256     PISSN: 01909320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11109-005-3242-y     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alvarez, Michael R., and Hall, Thad (2004). Point, Click, and Vote. Washington, DC: Brookings.
2. Bartels, Larry (1991). Instrumental and quasi-instrumental variables. American Journal of Political Science 35: 777-800.
3. Bennett, Stephen Earl, and Resnick, David (1990). The implications of nonvoting for democracy in the United States. American Journal of Political Science 34: 771-802.
4. Bimber, Bruce (1999). The Internet and citizen communication with government: does the medium matter?. Political Communication 16: 409-428.
5. Bimber, Bruce (2000). The study of information technology and civic engagement. Political Communication 17: 329-333.
6. Bimber, Bruce (2003). Information and American Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Brady, Henry, Verba, Sidney, and Schlozman, Kay Lehman (1995). Beyond ses: a resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review 89: 271-294.
8. Bucy, Erik (2000). Social access to the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics 5: 50-61.
9. Bucy, Erik, and Gregson, Kimberly (2001). Media participation: a legitimizing mechanism of mass democracy. New Media and Society 3: 357-380.
10. Center for Survey Research & Analysis (2003). Data obtained from the survey center at the University of Connecticut.
11. Chatterjee, Samprit, Hadi, Ali, and Price, Bertram (1999). Regression Analysis by Example. New York: Wiley.
12. Conway, M. Margaret (1991). Political Participation in the United States. Washington: CQ Press.
13. Cornfield, Michael (2004). New and improved. Campaign & Elections 25: 42.
14. Cornfield, Michael, Lee Rainie, and John Horrigan (2003). Untuned keyboards: online campaigners, citizens, and portals in the 2002 elections. A Pew Internet and American Life Project.
15. Dahl, Robert (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
16. Davis, Richard, and Owen, Diana (1998). New Media and American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Delli Carpini, Michael (2000). Gen.com: youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication 17: 341-349.
18. Fox, John (1991). Regression Diagnostics. Newbury Park: Sage Publication.
19. Gant, Michael, and Lyons, William (1993). Democratic theory, nonvoting, and public policy. American Politics Quarterly 21: 185-204.
20. Grubesic, Tony, and Murray, Alan (2002). Constructing the divide: spatial disparities in broadband access. Papers in Regional Science 81: 197-221.
21. Hill, Quaile Kim, and Jan E. Leighley (1992). The policy consequences of class bias in state electorates. American Journal of Political Science 36; 351-65.
22. Johnson, Thomas, and Kaye, Barbara (2003). A boost or bust for democracy?. Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics 8: 9-34.
23. Keeter, Scott, Miller, Carolyn, Kohut, Andrew, Groves, Robert M., and Presser, Stanley (2000). Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a large national telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly 64: 125-148.
24. Kiesler, Sara, Zdaniuk, Bozena, Lundmark, Vicki, and Kraut, Robert (2000). Trobules with the Internet: The dynamics of help at home. Human-Computer Interaction 15: 323-351.
25. Kling, Robert (1999). What is social informatics and why does it matter?. D-Lib Magazine 5: 1-30.
26. Krueger, Brian (2002). Assessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States: a resource approach. American Politics Research 30: 476-498.
27. Lau, Richard, and Pomper, Gerald (2002). Effectiveness of negative campaigning in U.S. Senate elections. American Journal of Political Science 46: 47-67.
28. Leigh, Andrew, and Atkinson, Robert (2001). Clear thinking on the digital divide. Paper published by The Progressive Policy Institute.
29. Levy, Steven (2004). Dean's net effect is just the start. Newsweek 143: 73.
30. Lijphart, Arend (1997). Unequal participation: democracy's unresolved dilemma. American Political Science Review 91: 1-14.
31. Murdock, Graham, and Golding, Peter (1989). Information poverty and political inequality: citizenship in the age of privatized communications. Journal of Communication 39: 180-193.
32. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (2000). Falling through the net: toward digital inclusion. Report published by the U.S. Department of Commerce.
33. Morris, Pippa (2002). Political campaigning on the Internet: business as usual? In Kamarck, Elaine and Joseph Nye, Jr. (eds.), Governance.com. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
34. Morris, Pippa (1999). Who surfs? new technology, old voters and virtual democracy in the 1996 and 1998 US elections. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conference.
35. Putnam, Robert (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
36. Radcliff, Benjamin (1994). Turnout and the Democratic vote. American Politics Quarterly 22: 259-76.
37. Sargan, J.D. (1958). The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica 26: 393-415.
38. Shah, Dhavan, Mcleod, Jack, and Yoon, So-Hyang (2001). Communication, context, and community. Communication Research 28: 464-506.
39. Solop, Frederic (2000). Digital democracy comes of age in Arizona. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conference.
40. Tabachnick, Barbara, and Fidell, Linda (1996). Using Multivariate Statistics. 3New York: HarperCollins.
41. Tichenor, P.J., Donohue, G.A., and Olien, C.N. (1965). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly 34: 159-170.
42. Tolbert, Caroline, and McNeal, Ramona (2003). Unraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation?. Political Research Quarterly 56: 175-185.
43. Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary (2003). CLARIFY: software for interpreting and presenting statistical results.
44. Vavreck, Lynn, Spiliotes, Constantine, and Fowler, Linda (2002). The effects of retail politics in the New Hampshire primary. American Journal of Political Science 46: 595-611.
45. Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E. (1995). Voice and Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
46. Weber, Lori, Loumakis, Alysha, and Bergman, James (2003). Who participates and why?: an analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public. Social Science Computer Review 21: 26-42.
47. Wolf, Gary (2004) Weapons of mass mobilization. Wired 12.09: 1-8.
48. Wolfinger, Raymond, and Rosenstone, Steven (1980). Who Votes?. New Haven: Yale University Press.