Citizens' expectations of information cities: Implications for urban planning and design

Building Research and Information

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 55-66

  Curwell, Steve ^a   Deakin, Mark ^b   Cooper, Ian ^c   Paskaleva Shapira, Krassimira ^d   Ravetz, Joe ^e   Babicki, Dominica ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b EDINBURGH NAPIER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c The Eden Centre   (United Kingdom)

^d KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

E government; E planning; Electronic governance; Electronic services; Infrastructure; Knowledge society; Public participation; Regionalism, sustainable development; Urban planning

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; EMPLOYMENT; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET; PRODUCTIVITY; PUBLIC POLICY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

E-GOVERNMENT; E-PLANNING; ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE; ELECTRONIC SERVICES; INFRASTRUCTURE; KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; REGIONALISM;

URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 12744277424     PISSN: 09613218     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0961321042000329422     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Arabianranta (2004) (available at: http://www.helsinkivirtualvillage.fi/ Resource.phx/adc/inenglish.htx).
2. Bentivegna, V., Curwell, C., Deakin, M., Lombardi, P., Mitchell, G. and Nijkamp, P. (2002) A vision and methodology for integrated sustainable urban development: BEQUEST. Building Research & Information, 30(2), 83-94.
3. Cap Gemini (2004) Online Availability of Public Services: How is Europe Progressing, Cap Gemini Ernst & Young (available at: http://www.capgemini. com/news/2003/0206egov.shtml).
4. Castells, M. and Hall, P. (1994) Technopoles of the World, London, Routledge.
5. CEC (2002) eEurope 2005: An Information Society for All. COM(2002) 263, Commission for the European Community, Brussels.
6. CEC (2003) eEurope 2002 Final Report. COM(2003) 66, Commission for the European Community, Brussels.
7. CEC (2004) eEurope 2005 Action Plan: An Update. eEurope Advisory Group, COM(2004) 380, Commission for the European Community, Brussels.
8. Cooper, I. (2002) Transgressing discipline boundaries: is BEQUEST an example of 'the new production of knowledge'?, Building Research & Information, 30(2), 116-129.
9. Curwell, S. and Deakin, M. (2002) Sustainable urban development and BEQUEST. Building Research & Information, 30(2), 79-82.
10. Deakin, M., Huovila, P., Rao, S., Sunikka, M. and Vreeker, R. (2002) The assessment of sustainable urban development. Building Research & Information, 30(2), 95-108.
11. eGO (2004) e-Government Observatory (available at: http:// www.europa.eu.int/ida/egovo).
12. IntelCities (2004) (available at: http://www.intelcitiesproject. com).
13. INTELCITY (2003) (available at: http://ndmodelling.scpm. salford.ac.uk/intelcity/).
14. Kohler, N. (2002) The relevance of BEQUEST: an observer's perspective. Building Research & Information, 30(2), 130-138.
15. Mitchell, W. (1999) E-topia, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2004) E-Planning has arrived, News Release, 16 February.
17. Top of the Web (2003) Survey on quality and usage of public e-services, November (available at: http://www.topoftheweb. net/).